Hunterdon, NJ – Hunterdon Healthcare, a New Jersey based hospital has banned the use of face coverings that have proven to be ineffective in stopping or slowing the spread of COVID-19.
“Recently there have been several masks/face coverings that have been identified as being not effective at preventing the spread of COVID-19. At this time, Hunterdon Healthcare will not be allowing visitors, patients, or staff to wear neck gaiters, bandanas, or masks with exhalation valves, including N95s or KN95s, while within any of our facilities,” the hospital said in a statement. “If a patient, visitor, or staff arrives at one of our facilities wearing any of these restricted masks/face coverings, they will be asked to remove the restricted mask/face covering and Hunterdon Healthcare will supply a procedural mask for the person to wear while in the facility.”
Among the banned facial coverings are neck gaiters, bandanas and masks with exhalation valves. A recent Duke University study found those masks to be deficient when protecting both the wearer and others against the spread of COVID-19.
A new study published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science found that the use of trendy bandanas and neck gaiters does very little, if anything to stop the spread of COVID-19 droplets. The study was conducted by researches at Duke University’s biomedical, chemistry, physics and medical departments.
Lately, as Governor Phil Murphy says his COVID-19 decision making is guided by science, Murphy now finds himself in an uncomfortable position of telling people, do as he says, not necessarily as he does. That’s because in recent photo-ops from the Jersey Shore, the governor and his wife Tammy have been out and about wearing custom printed neck gaiters, which according to this study, are essentially worthless when it comes to fighting and stopping COVID-19.
“Mandates for mask use in public during the recent COVID-19 pandemic, worsened by global shortage of commercial supplies, have led to widespread use of homemade masks and mask alternatives. It is assumed that wearing such masks reduces the likelihood for an infected person to spread the disease, but many of these mask designs have not been tested in practice,” the researches found. “We have demonstrated a simple optical measurement method to evaluate the efficacy of masks to reduce the transmission of respiratory droplets during regular speech. In proof-of-principle studies, we compared a variety of commonly available mask types and observed that some mask types approach the performance of standard surgical masks, while some mask alternatives, such as neck fleece or bandanas, offer very little protection. Our measurement setup is inexpensive and can be built and operated by non-experts, allowing for rapid evaluation of mask performance during speech, sneezing, or coughing.”
The scientists used a laser beam and cylindrical lense to measure the amount of droplets emitted from a human being while wearing each variety of PPE devices, ranging from N95 respirators to bandanas and fleece face coverings.
“We tested 14 commonly available masks or masks alternatives, one patch of mask material, and a professionally fit-tested N95 mask. For reference, we recorded control trials where the speaker wore no protective mask or covering,” the study’s report said. “Each test was performed with the same protocol. The camera was used to record a video of approximately 40 s length to record droplets emitted while speaking. The first 10 s of the video serve as baseline. In the next 10 s, the mask wearer repeated the sentence “Stay healthy, people” five times (speech), after which the camera kept recording for an additional 20 s (observation). For each mask and for the control trial, this protocol was repeated 10 times. We used a computer algorithm (see Materials and Methods) to count the number of particles within each video.”
You can read the complete study report here.