Former Florida medical facility network owner Philip Esformes received a 20-year prison sentence in 2019 after being convicted of 20 counts including conspiracy to defraud the United States, receiving and paying federal healthcare program kickbacks, money laundering, federal program bribery and obstruction of justice, with six charges being dismissed and the jury failing to reach a verdict on six others. After Esformes entered an appeal invoking prosecutorial misconduct, having been confined since his 2016 arrest, Trump commuted his prison sentence in December 2020 to time served without erasing his three-year supervised release term or remaining $5,530,207 restitution requirement, but DOJ prosecutors announced plans in April 2021 to try Esformes again on the hung charges, according to the Miami Herald,
A retrial on the hung counts would be “fundamentally unjust” and violate Trump‘s clemency order, Ashcroft told the Daily Caller News Foundation.
“President Trump ordered Mr. Esformes to be released immediately without additional restrictions so he could be reunited with his family,” Ashcroft told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “Indeed, Margaret Love, the U.S. pardon attorney from 1990 through 1997, found that ‘the best understanding’ of Mr. Trump’s clemency warrant ‘is that it was intended to end the government’s prosecution and imprisonment of Esformes.’”
Ashcroft and fellow former Attorneys General Edwin Meese, Michael Mukasey and Alberto Gonzalez all endorsedEsformes’ appeal before the clemency grant. Ashcroft claimed the prosecutorial misconduct in Esformes’ case “was amongst the most abusive” he has ever seen, based on a Magistrate Judge’s findings in a 9-day evidentiary hearing.
“The Magistrate Judge found that the prosecutors knowingly and repeatedly invaded Mr. Esformes’ privileged attorney‐client communications, and then used that confidential information against him,” Ashcroft told the DCNF. “The Magistrate Judge found that not only had the prosecutors ‘wholly disregarded all privilege concerns’ in taking and using Mr. Esformes’ privileged information, but that prosecutors tried to cover that up at the evidentiary hearing by creating a ‘new narrative’ that she found had ‘zero credibility.’ In fact, the Magistrate Judge characterized the prosecutors’ conduct as a ‘deplor[able]’ effort to ‘obfuscate’ the evidentiary record.”