COLUMBUS, OH – Two men were shot early Tuesday morning in the Weinland Park area of Columbus. The incident, reported near the 1300 block of North 4th Street shortly before 1 a.m., resulted in injuries to both victims who are now recovering in local hospitals.

Police collected 22 shell casings at the scene but have not yet identified a motive or suspects.

This comes on the heels of another shooting incident, where a man’s body was found near a dumpster on North 4th Street and East 3rd Avenue in Italian Village.

Detectives are investigating both incidents, though no connection has been confirmed.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

MOSCOW (Reuters) -The Russian chapter of the global environmental campaign group WWF on Thursday said it had cut ties with WWF International after Russia designated WWF as an “undesirable organisation”.

The label is equivalent to a ban on the group’s activities in Russia.

On Wednesday, the prosecutor-general had accused WWF-Russia of presenting “security threats in the economic sphere”. It said WWF had waged “tendentious” campaigns against the energy, oil and natural gas industries, which it said were aimed at “shackling” Russia’s economic development.

WWF-Russia had already been labelled a “foreign agent”, a designation that carries connotations of spying. The tag has been applied widely to civil society groups, with the effect of further crushing citizen-led activism, already under broad pressure from authorities.

WWF International said its Russian branch had operated as a “non-partisan national organisation, fully governed and managed by Russian citizens working towards the preservation of the biological diversity of the planet”.

WWF began working in Russia in 1989 and has been involved in major projects to protect endangered species such as Siberian (Amur) tigers, polar bears and European bison.

The organisation said it regretted being accused of posing a security threat, and that “conservation of our natural world is vital, particularly as the climate and biodiversity crises accelerate around the world”.

WWF’s fellow environmental group Greenpeace was banned in Russia last month. WWF Russia said it would no longer use the WWF acronym or panda logo.

(Reporting by Reuters; Writing by Alexander Marrow; Editing by Kevin Liffey and Mark Trevelyan)

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

DAVID BLACKMON: Another Silly Outburst From The ‘Green’ Globalists

David Blackmon on June 21, 2023

In a new set of remarks attacking the global oil and gas industry last week, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres raised the hyperbole level one more time, attacking oil company investments in carbon capture and storage projects (CCS) as “proposals to become more efficient planet wreckers.”

The Financial Times, AP and other outlets reported that Guterres further stated, “Let’s face facts. The problem is not simply fossil fuel emissions. It’s fossil fuels — period. We are hurtling towards disaster, eyes wide open, with far too many willing to bet it all on wishful thinking, unproven technologies and silver bullet solutions.” Later in his comments, he also said, “Trading the future for thirty pieces of silver is immoral.”

The allusion to fossil fuel emissions apparently targeted United Arab Emirates COP28 president-designate Sultan al-Jaber, who is also the head of the state oil company Adnoc. Mr. al-Jaber has rejected attacks on the future license to operate of the industry itself, like those from Mr. Guterres, reasoning that the focus should be on the control of emissions instead. The UAE will play host to the 2023 COP28 conference in Dubai from November 30 through December 12, a reality that has provoked concern from the global climate alarmist movement.

Secretary Guterres has made a habit of using hyperbolic, bombastic rhetoric in his periodic attacks on the oil and gas industry, at one point in August 2022 claiming the industry was responsible for putting the world on a “highway to climate hell,” so his latest outburst is really no surprise. What is notable from this current bit of bombast, though, is the irony of a consistent proponent of an “energy transition” that schemes to displace highly energy-dense fuels like oil, gas and coal with low energy-density wind, solar and lithium-ion batteries accusing anyone else of being willing to rely on “wishful thinking, unproven technologies and silver bullet solutions.”

For decades now, since at least the early 1990s, we have been treated to claim after claim of a step-change in battery technology that would enable weather-reliant wind and solar to suddenly become 24/7 providers of energy being just around the corner. Yet, though billions have been invested in research and development of new technologies, this silver bullet remains unproven, still just around the corner, where it has supposedly resided for 30 years or more.

We have been consistently told by much of our legacy media, invariably quoting from renewables boosters, that wind energy is now extremely cheap and supposedly out-competing coal and natural gas. Yet, just Monday, the CEO of Big Wind developer Orsted, Mads Nipper, urged the British government to provide even more subsidization to offshore wind projects struggling to obtain private financing. This plea came despite the many billions of pounds in subsidies and tax breaks already provided by the UK to the wind industry, and despite the fact that Orsted itself enjoyed record profits in 2022.

Given that, perhaps UK officials should be pursuing to levy a windfall profit tax on Big Wind instead. After all, if “trading the future for 30 pieces of silver is immoral,” what then is trading the future for hundreds of billions in debt-funded subsidies?

The point here, though, is that wind energy remains exactly the kind of “unproven technology” Sec. Guterres accuses oil companies of pursuing. So, too, are the electric vehicles Guterres and other global elites promote as the “silver bullet” that can and will displace internal combustion engine (ICE) automobiles. Yet, despite 20 years of heavy subsidization, Teslas and other EVs remain pricey luxury items affordable only to the higher classes of people in most nations, including the United States and Europe.

The impulse Sec. Guterres apparently feels to ramp up the hyperbolic attacks on oil and gas in support of an energy transition that is increasingly failing to progress as he hopes is unhelpful, and frankly silly. Global leaders should be engaged in a serious debate about the future of energy and energy security, but doing that requires having serious people engaged in the discussions.

It is unfortunate that Mr. Guterres so frequently demonstrates he does not qualify as such a person.

David Blackmon is an energy writer and consultant based in Texas. He spent 40 years in the oil and gas business, where he specialized in public policy and communications.

The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller News Foundation.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Middle School Math Scores See Biggest Drop In 50 Years

Reagan Reese on June 21, 2023

Math test scores for 13-year-old students have plummeted by the largest drop ever recorded in 50 years, according to a Wednesday report.

Between 2020 and 2023, 13-year-old students’ math scores dropped nine points and the students’ reading scores dropped four points, according to test data from the National Center for Education Statistics, better known as the “Nation’s Report Card.” The latest set of data demonstrates the learning loss students have suffered as a result of education disruptions, such as remote schooling, during the COVID-19 pandemic.

“Students’ basic skills were disrupted in a way that we would not have thought before,” Peggy G. Carr, commissioner of the National Center for Education Statistics, said in a statement. “These data are clear on that point.”

The math test scores have dropped to their lowest level since 1990, according to the New York Times; the test has been administered since 1973. The 13-year-old students’ reading scores are at their lowest since 2004.

The decline in math scores was the largest in 50 years, according to an Axios analysis.

“The ‘green shoots’ of academic recovery that we had hoped to see have not materialized,” Carr said in a statement.

In 2022, civics scores saw their first ever decline in the area while just 13% of eighth graders tested proficiently in U.S. history, according to the Nation’s Report Card. From 2020 to 2022, K-12 reading levels fell back to levels last seen in the 1990s while math scores took their first ever dip.

School districts that stayed remote the longest during the COVID-19 pandemic, rather than returning to in-person learning, suffered the largest learning losses. Some school districts are expected to spend millions of dollars trying to make up for the learning loss.

The test used to gauge the students’ math and reading scores was administered to 8,700 students through November and December of 2022.

“The strongest advice I have is that we need to keep at it,” Carr said in a statement. “It is a long road ahead of us.”

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Elon Musk Says The Strange Words LGBT Activists Invented To Describe Normal People Are ‘Slurs’

Brandon Poulter on June 21, 2023

Elon Musk declared Wednesday morning that the words “cis” and “cisgender” will now be considered slurs on Twitter.

Musk made the announcement in response to Thoughtful Therapists Co-Founder James Esses’ Tuesday tweet saying he received backlash from transgender activists after he posted that he rejects “the word ‘cis.’” Musk clarified that “cis” and “cisgender” are “considered slurs on this platform,” but did not detail what the punishment would be for those who use the words.

He then clarified that accounts who engage in “repeated, targeted harassment against any account” will be temporarily suspended, according to the tweet.

Cisgender is used to refer to a person “whose gender identity corresponds with the sex the person had or was identified as having at birth,” according to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Cis is a shortened version of the term.

Musk experienced controversy regarding free speech matters after purchasing Twitter.

Jeremy Boreing, co-founder of The Daily Wire, alleged that Twitter canceled a deal to “premier” its documentary “What Is A Woman” for free because of instances of misgendering. The thread resulted in backlash from conservatives, and Musk later said the incident was a “mistake.”

Twitter did not respond to Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Dems Terrified A Joe Manchin Third-Party Run Will Hand GOP Control Of Senate, White House

Mary Lou Masters on June 21, 2023

Senate Democrats are concerned that a third-party presidential run from West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin could hand the GOP control of the Senate and the White House in 2024, according to Politico.

Manchin has teased a presidential run via centrist organization No Labels’ third-party ticket, and hasn’t yet committed to a Senate reelection bid, where he has already drawn two Republican challengers. Several of his Democratic colleagues are warning against a presidential run, and are encouraging Manchin to run for another term instead, according to Politico.

“I have advised him against it. I think it would be a terrible idea,” Sen. John Hickenlooper of Colorado told Politico. “It would help Donald Trump.”

Many are worried No Labels’ third-party “unity ticket” would be a spoiler in the 2024 election, and would take more votes from President Joe Biden than the Republican nominee. No Labels officials recently acknowledged that they likely won’t run a third-party candidate in the event that former President Donald Trump isn’t the GOP nominee.

“You never know about Joe,” Montana Sen. John Tester told Politico. “It would be bad for the country if Joe didn’t run for U.S. Senate.”

Michigan Sen. Gary Peters, who chairs the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, told Politico that while Manchin continues to consider a presidential bid, “I’m encouraging him to run for the Senate every opportunity I get.”

West Virginia’s Gov. Jim Justice and Rep. Alex Mooney are running for the Republican nomination for Manchin’s Senate seat, and the governor is currently leading the congressman 53% to 12%, according to a May 30 East Carolina University poll. The same poll indicates that Manchin would lose to both Justice and Mooney in the general by 22 points and 1 point, respectively.

“My gut tells me there’s still a really good likelihood that Joe’s gonna run for reelection. And we need him, too,” Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine told Politico. “If Gov. Justice thinks he’s gonna sweep Joe Manchin aside, I know that Joe Manchin is like, ‘Are you kidding me? No way.’”

Manchin was first elected to the Senate in 2010 via a special election, where he defeated his Republican opponent 53.5% to 43.4%, and won in 2012 by roughly 24 points, according to Ballotpedia. The Senator held a narrower victory in 2018, where he won against GOP Attorney General Patrick Morrisey by only 3.3 points.

Manchin did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

US-Made Air Defense System Cleared To Deploy In South Korea, Angering China

Micaela Burrow on June 21, 2023

A powerful U.S.-made missile defense system cleared a review that stalled its deployment in South Korea, opening a path to full emplacement in Seoul’s arsenal and strengthening U.S. military ties with a key ally, The Wall Street Journal reported.

The Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) battery arrived in South Korea during the Trump administration and amid skyrocketing tensions between the West and North Korea, according to the WSJ. Local residents near the former golf course where it was initially stationed protested, triggering the newly-inaugurated administration, which took a nonconfrontational posture toward hostile neighbors Russia, China and North Korea, to initiate an environmental review that blocked its full assembly for nearly six years.

The review concluded that the electromagnetic waves emitted by the THAAD system posed little danger to civilians, Seoul’s environment and defense ministries said Thursday, according to the WSJ. The system is expected to become fully operational on South Korean soil in 2024.

China, Russia and South Korea had opposed the THAAD deployment, calling it a security provocation, according to the WSJ.

South Korea’s conservative former administration approved the THAAD deployment amid a flurry of North Korean missile tests, the WSJ reported. The system is capable of intercepting short and medium-range missiles, including once they begin a downward trajectory, and has a much larger radar detection range than any missile defense system South Korea previously fielded.

But shortly after left-leaning President Moon Jae-in took office in 2017, he expressed skepticism about deploying the system. China was believed to have retaliated against Seoul for the decision, leading to a drop in revenue from Beijing-driven trade and tourism, according to the WSJ. Moon achieved congenial relations with China, in part on the condition he would not pursue any further THAAD deployments.

U.S. Forces Korea declined to comment to the WSJ.

Moon’s successor, Yoon Suk-Yeoul has strengthened ties with the U.S. and taken a harder line on China, even risking China’s ire by opposing any unilateral changes to the status quo in Taiwan, according to the WSJ. Reuters previously reported the U.S. and South Korea are discussing ways to cooperate on U.S. nuclear operations, a way of reinforcing“extended deterrence” as North Korea escalates military buildup and threatens Seoul’s sovereignty.

Deploying the THAAD system represents a “matter of security sovereignty that can never be subject to negotiation,” a South Korean official said in August after China attempted to persuade Seoul to honor the Moon administration’s promises, according to the WSJ.

China will likely retaliate again against South Korea but will have to take calculated action or risk driving Seoul closer to Washington, Sukhee Han, president of South Korea’s Institute for National Security Strategy, told the WSJ.

“When you’re too important to be ignored, it’s best to align and strengthen your defenses so you don’t end up as a battlefield,” Elbridge Colby, principal of The Marathon Initiative and former U.S. deputy assistant secretary of defense, tweeted on Tuesday. That’s “why a policy of trying to stay out of it is unwise for countries like South Korea.”

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Liberal Justices Have Been Biggest Winners So Far This Term On ‘Conservative’ Supreme Court

Katelynn Richardson on June 21, 2023

With some of the highest profile opinions yet to be released, the Supreme Court’s liberals have been frequently in the majority this term, Politico reported.

Conservative justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch have dissented the most, at ten times, nine times and seven times, respectively, according to Politico, which notes that this trend “has confounded the narrative of a court fully captured by the right.” Though some experts cautioned against drawing conclusions before significant cases on issues like affirmative action, student debt and a public accommodation law that compels religious business owners to provide services for same-sex weddings, others told the outlet it shows not all cases split along “right-left lines.”

“This term so far reinforces the point that not all cases — not even all important cases — split the justices along right-left lines,” said Ilya Somin, a law professor at George Mason University, told Politico. “In addition, the six-justice conservative majority has internal disagreements on some key issues, as cases like Milligan and Haaland demonstrate.”

Alito and Thomas dissented in Haaland v. Brackeen, where the majority rejected challenges to the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978. Thomas, Gorsuch, Barrett and Alito dissented in Allen v. Milligan, where the majority struck down Alabama’s congressional map as a violation of the Voting Rights Act, while Justice Brett Kavanaugh and Chief Justice John Roberts joined the three liberal justices in the majority.

With 18 cases left, there have been zero decisions that split 6-3 along ideological lines, Supreme Court scholar and Empirical SCOTUS creator Adam Feldman noted last week. Last term, 14 decisions split along these lines, according to Feldman.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has authored the most majority opinions to date, at six, followed by Justices Elena Kagan, Amy Coney Barrett and Neil Gorsuch, at five each, according to SCOTUSBlog statistics. Justice Sonia Sotomayor has found herself in the majority most, Politico reported, whereas in previous terms she was the most likely to dissent.

Case Western Reserve Law Professor Jonathan Adler wrote on Twitter this means Jackson is “likely done” with majority opinions for the term.

After the justices’ unanimous decision in Sackett v. EPA, which scaled back the government’s authority to regulate under the Clean Water Act, Democrats slammed the Supreme Court as “MAGA” and “extremist,” despite liberal justices concurring in judgement.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

John Durham Says FBI Agents ‘Apologized’ To Him For Trump-Russia Investigation

Arjun Singh on June 21, 2023

Former Special Counsel John Durham on Wednesday said FBI agents had “apologized” to him for the Crossfire Hurricane investigation into former President Donald Trump and his campaign from 2016 to 2019, per his testimony to the House Judiciary Committee.

Durham, who was appointed Special Counsel to investigate the origins of the investigation into Trump’s campaign – which later revealed that Trump had not colluded with Russia to win the election – interviewed FBI agents who were involved in the investigation. Those FBI agents were ashamed of their work on the investigation, according to Durham, who also said that several other agents had apologized to him for the FBI’s conduct.

“Let me give you some real-life views: I have had any number of FBI agents…who have come to me and apologized for the manner in which that investigation [Crossfire Hurricane] was undertaken. These are good, hard-working, decent people,” Durham said in response to a question asked by Republican Rep. Mike Johnson of Louisiana, who asked about Durham’s opening testimony where he said that the conclusions of his report were “sobering.”

Durham noted another instance where FBI agents expressed recrimination for the investigation. In an exchange with Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, Durham said that one of the Supervisory Special Agents of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation “became emotional” when presented with a memorandum about the Hillary Clinton campaign’s efforts to promote the idea Russia was supporting Trump, which then-FBI Director James Comey did not share with the agents.

“We interviewed the first supervisor…the operational person. We showed him the intelligence information. He indicated that he’d never seen it before. He immediately became emotional. Got up and left the room with his lawyer. Spent some time there before he came back,” Durham said.

“He was ticked off, wasn’t he? He was ticked off because this was important information that he should have had working on the case…that the FBI Director kept from him while working on the investigation,” Jordan asked.

“The information was kept from him,” Durham replied.

The intelligence about the Clinton campaign’s promotion of the idea that Russia was supporting Trump was serious enough for then-CIA Director John Brennan to brief President Barack Obama about Clinton’s plan. That briefing was attended by then-Vice President Joe Biden, Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Comey, with the intelligence being packaged into a ‘Referral Memorandum’ that he and then-Assistant Director Peter Strzok obtained.

Apart from agents involved in the case, Comey and Strzok, neither shared the information with the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court when seeking Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants for domestic surveillance of investigation targets nor shared them with government lawyers preparing warrant applications to the court, per testimony before the committee.

The results of Durham’s investigation were published in a report transmitted to Capitol Hill on May 15, a copy of which was obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation. The report found that the Department’s decision to open the investigation into Trump failed to maintain “strict fidelity to the law.”

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

France Shuts Down ‘Eco-Terrorism’ Group It Says Encouraged ‘Violence’

John Hugh DeMastri on June 21, 2023

The French government will take steps to shut down Les Soulèvements de la Terre (SLT), a climate activism group, for advocating what the government described as violent “eco-terrorism,” according to multiple reports.

The government argued that SLT “encourages sabotage and material damage,” using climate activism and conservation as a “pretence” for their activities, according to Reuters. SLT lawyer Raphael Kempf told the outlet that the shutdown was an “infringement on freedom of expression” that intentionally targeted the group for its speech, as opposed to its behavior.

“You don’t dissolve an association because of its ideas,” said government spokesman Olivier Véran, according to The Guardian. “You dissolve it because there is violence or a risk for public safety.”

Véran alleged that the group “whipped up violence” at a March protest at a planned irrigation site in Sainte-Soline, France, and invited rioters “from across Europe” welding metal bars and pétanque balls “to try to kill police officers,” The Guardian reported. The unauthorized protest devolved into a violent battle between the roughly 6,000 protesters and around 3,200 police officers, in which police officers used stun grenades and tear gas to repel protestors, who set fire to at least three police vehicles, according to Reuters.

When the dust had settled, seven protesters were injured and 24 police officers were injured, with one protestor and officer in critical but not life-threatening condition, Reuters reported.

Activist groups and police traded blame for the violence, with the French Human Rights League alleging that police fired at protesters with “weapons of war” such as tear gas grenades, stun grenades, rubber bullets and explosive sting-ball grenades, “as soon as the demonstrators arrived,” according to The Guardian. Interior Minister Gerald Darmanin at the time blamed the violence on roughly 1,000 far-left activists, who he alleged had been agitating in the area since the day prior, Reuters reported.

Prosecutors announced on Tuesday that they had detained 14 individuals in relation to vandalism at a SLT protest, The Guardian reported. SLT claimed in a press release that at least 18 people linked to the movement were arrested “across France,” and decried the government’s efforts to “silence” them.

“We know, the true association of criminals, is the one between the government, the agro-industrial lobby and the [Construction and Public Works] sector which is in the process of destroying the Earth in an irreversible way,” the group said in a press release, translated by the Daily Caller News Foundation.

The French Interior Ministry and SLT did not immediately respond to a Daily Caller News Foundation request for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Biden Admin Doubles Down On Bankrolling Activist Org Working To Censor Conservatives

Jason Cohen on June 21, 2023

President Joe Biden’s administration awarded two grants to a U.K.-based think tank that routinely works to censor conservatives online for what it considers to be mis- and disinformation.

The State Department is sending the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD) nearly $250,000 for a program combatting “hate and polarization” in Eastern Europe; the grant began in April and will end in March 2024. The ISD is a British nongovernmental organization funded by left-wing billionaires and European government agencies that collaborates with online platforms such as YouTube and Spotify to crack down on so-called misinformation.

The think tank often classifies ordinary conservative discussions and journalism as hate and/or disinformation, such as “abortion misinformation,” “COVID-19 disinformation” and “climate disinformation,” according to a Daily Caller News Foundation review of the organization’s materials. The Department of Defense (DOD) sent the ISD $80,000 in May, according to a grant for Air Force research “to prevent technological surprise to our nation and create it for our adversaries.”

The Daily Caller News Foundation first reported a 2021 State Department grant to the organization intended to “advance the development of promising and innovative technologies against disinformation and propaganda” in Europe and the United Kingdom.

The House Foreign Affairs Committee is investigating the ISD’s role in advocating censorship of speech “particularly by established conservative media and individuals,” according to a House Foreign Affairs Committee press release.

An ISD report in 2021 cited misgendering as an example of “anti-trans hatred” in a report on social media discourse on the topic of men’s participation in women’s sports. The organization’s report concluded by pushing platforms to take action by “actively monitoring accounts that have shown to be repeat offenders on this issue,” including prominent conservative figures.

The organization also called Libs of Tik Tok, a popular conservative Twitter account revealing examples of left-wing pedagogy like CRT and gender ideology, as a “prolific spreader of hate” in January.

Furthermore, YouTube includes the ISD in its “Trusted Flagger program,” an initiative that collaborates with multiple nongovernmental organizations and government agencies designed to assist YouTube in enforcing its guidelines.

ISD lists left-wing billionaire Pierre Omidyar’s Omidyar Group, George Soros’ Open Society Foundations and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, along with several European government agencies, as funders.

The State Department, DOD and ISD did not immediately respond to the DCNF’s request for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Agents In One Area Of The Northern Border Saw More Migrants Cross Illegally In Eight Months Than Last Six Years

Jennie Taer on June 21, 2023

Border Patrol agents stationed along the Swanton sector of the northern border saw a surge in illegal migrants crossing in a period of eight months that topped what they experienced in the last six years, according to the agency.

Border Patrol recorded 3,823 illegal migrant encounters between October 2022 and May 2023 in the Swanton sector, which encompasses parts of New York, Vermont and New Hampshire, according to recently updated U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data. The new record coincides with a broader surge in illegal migration across the northern border, where agents have recorded more than 5,600 illegal migrant encounters in the last eight months.

“How do they do it? We’re often asked how our @borderpatrol Agents manage the increased volume of illicit cross-border traffic—currently over 6 years of arrests (2017-2022) in under 9 months (FY 2023). The answers: Grit. Integrity. Vigilance. Dedication to serve. Love of Country,” Swanton sector Border Patrol Chief Robert Garcia said in a statement regarding the surge.

Border Patrol agents and residents along the northern border have expressed concerns with the surge in interviews that took place in recent months with the Daily Caller News Foundation.

The northern border, which is the largest shared border in the world, lacks enough manpower to address the influx, agents stationed along the area previously told the DCNF. The surge can also be attributed to lax travel restrictions that allow many migrants to fly to Canada without having to obtain a visa.

“Everybody in this area is on edge,” Northern border resident Dan Cowan, whose home is located in the Swanton sector, previously told the DCNF. “We don’t have the holding capacity for Border Patrol or U.S. Customs. What are they gonna do with these people when they’re getting here? They’re not deporting them.”

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Trump Admin Tracked Chinese Tech Workers At Suspected Spy Bases In Cuba: REPORT

Micaela Burrow on June 21, 2023

The Trump administration was aware of employees representing two Chinese tech giants entering suspected spy facilities in Cuba, fueling suspicions the firms colluded with Beijing to surveil the U.S., The Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday, citing people familiar with the matter.

Officials tracked intelligence showing workers for Huawei and ZTE going back and forth between facilities in Cuba where China has operated espionage outposts since at least 2019, leading the administration to believe China sought to expand spying capabilities on the island, the WSJ reported. The Trump administration designated Huawei and ZTE national security threats, placing them on an export blacklist and urging allies to ban Huawei products.

Huawei and ZTE develop commercial communications technology used by private companies and governments worldwide, including data servers and network technology the spy outpost could use to transmit data to Beijing, according to the WSJ.

Huawei denied “such groundless accusations” in a statement to the outlet, adding the company remains “committed to full compliance with the applicable laws and regulations where we operate.”

The WSJ could not confirm whether the Biden administration followed a similar line of investigation, and the Director of National Intelligence did not respond to the outlet’s request for comment. Neither did ZTE or the Chinese embassy in the U.S.

The Cuban and Chinese governments run at least four joint surveillance facilities on the island, according to the WSJ.

The Biden administration characterized a June 8 report from the WSJ that described Chinese plans to establish a signals intelligence collection outpost on Cuba as “inaccurate”, without providing specifics. White House officials disclosednewly declassified intelligence days later showing that China has established intelligence collection operations for years and conducted at least one major upgrade to existing facilities in 2019.

Beijing “will keep trying to enhance its presence in Cuba, and we will keep working to disrupt it,” a U.S. official said Monday, according to the WSJ.

Republican Rep. Mike Gallagher of Wisconsin raised concerns about Huawei’s continued involvement in upgrading the Cuban government’s communication infrastructure in letter to Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines and Commerce Department Secretary Gina Raimondo on Tuesday, according to the WSJ.

China’s “military-civil fusion” policy, which involves stealing technology from foreign sources through business deals between ostensibly private Chinese firms and international companies, would require even private Chinese firms to participate in Beijing’s effort to enhance intelligence collection facilities on the island, Gallagher said, according to the WSJ.

In addition, the long-term presence of Huawei, ZTE and another firm, Green Dragon, could provide cover for Chinese intelligence operatives to travel to and from Cuba, he said.

The White House and ZTE did not respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s requests for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Court Rules Against Attempt To Force Religious Company To Violate Beliefs On Sexuality

Kate Anderson on June 21, 2023

A federal court of appeals ruled Tuesday that a religious management company was within its rights under the First Amendment to require employees adhere to its religious beliefs.

Braidwood Management Inc. and Bear Creek Bible Church filed a lawsuit against the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in 2018, but judgment was withheld until the Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. Clayton County in 2020 that LGBTQ employees could sue employers for discriminatory practices, according to the decision. Braidwood argued following the higher court’s decision that Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act prevents them from adhering to their religious beliefs, and the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals agreed that “Title VII post-Bostock would substantially burden its ability to operate per its religious beliefs,” according to the decision.

“On the merits, and as we explain, we decide that [Religious Freedom Restoration Act] requires that Braidwood, on an individual level, be exempted from Title VII because compliance with Title VII post-Bostock would substantially burden its ability to operate per its religious beliefs about homosexual and transgender conduct,” the court wrote in its decision. “Moreover, the EEOC wholly fails to carry its burden to show that it has a compelling interest in refusing Braidwood an exemption, even post-Bostock.”

In Bostock, the Supreme Court decided that the Civil Rights Act also protects gay and transgender citizens from discrimination in addition to race, color, religion, sex and national origin, according to the higher court’s opinion. Braidwood argued that the Supreme Court’s decision violates its right under the First Amendment to freely exercise its religion in the workplace, claiming that it would have to violate its beliefs about marriage and sexuality in order to comply with the EEOC regulations, according to the appeal’s court ruling.

In light of this, the court dismissed EEOC’s counterargument that in order to comply with Title VII, it would only need to “refrain from taking adverse employment actions,” but the judges pointed out that the logic would require the company to comply with regulations that “it sees as sinful,” according to the ruling. The judges did not, however, grant the case class-action status, meaning that the ruling will only apply to Braidwood since the court could not “determine whether the employers’ codes of conduct are similar enough in practice to Braidwood’s that their lawfulness can be resolved ‘in one stroke,’” according to the ruling.

The EEOC declined to comment on the ruling.

Bear Creek and Braidwood did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

FTC Sues Amazon, Claims Tech Giant ‘Tricked’ Customers

Brandon Poulter on June 21, 2023

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sued Amazon on Wednesday, alleging the online retailing giant had enrolled customers in Amazon Prime without their consent and sabotaged their attempts to cancel.

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, alleges that Amazon was using “dark patterns,” which are deceptive design tactics intended to guide customers toward a specific choice. The FTC alleged that Amazon pushed millions of users into signing up for Amazon Prime unwillingly, according to an FTC press release.

“Amazon tricked and trapped people into recurring subscriptions without their consent, not only frustrating users but also costing them significant money,” FTC Chairwoman Lina Khan said in the press release.

The FTC previously sued Amazon in May for allegedly violating a children’s privacy law by keeping children’s voice recordings forever on Alexa speaker devices and ignoring parent’s deletion requests, according to an FTC press release. The FTC proposed that Amazon pay a $25 million civil penalty to settle the matter and to require Amazon to delete the inactive Alexa accounts of children. Amazon settled the case and agreed to pay the fine in June.

“During Amazon’s online checkout process, consumers were faced with numerous opportunities to subscribe to Amazon Prime at $14.99/month,” the FTC alleged. “In many cases, the option to purchase items on Amazon without subscribing to Prime was more difficult for consumers to locate. In some cases, the button presented to consumers to complete their transaction did not clearly state that in choosing that option they were also agreeing to join Prime for a recurring subscription.”

Khan’s tenure at the FTC has been turbulent, with former FTC commissioner Christine Wilson resigning in February, writing a Wall Street Journal column on the matter claiming Khan engaged in “abuses of government power.”

“She’s abandoned long-standing bipartisan practices and made it clear she will use the FTC to advance President Biden’s agenda in the name of economic ‘inequality’ and socialism,” Rep. Jim Jordan, ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, previously told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

Khan has made the argument prior that harm to competition is justification enough to go after big tech companies and has written a paper citing Amazon as a prime example.

Amazon did not immediately respond to the DCNF’s request for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

US Virgin Islands Gave Jeffrey Epstein $300 Million In Tax Incentives, JPMorgan Filing Says

Will Kessler on June 21, 2023

The U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) gave deceased convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein more than $300 million in tax incentives and other benefits, according to a court filing from JPMorgan Chase.

JPMorgan Chase alleged that Epstein was given over $300 million in tax incentives and had sex offender monitoring requirements lifted thanks to bribes and help given to USVI officials, enabling his sex trafficking operation, according to Tuesday court filings. JPMorgan Chase previously paid $290 million in a class action lawsuit to Epstein’s victims after ignoring internal warnings about Epstein.

“For two decades, Epstein maintained a quid pro quo relationship with USVI’s highest ranking officials,” the filing alleges. “He gave them money, advice, influence, and favors. In exchange, they shielded and even rewarded him, granting him more than $300 million in tax incentives, waiving sex offender monitoring requirements, looking the other way when he walked through USVI airports accompanied by girls and young women, and even facilitating ESL classes and visas that allowed Epstein to bring victims to his island. ”

The USVI has previously taken action to address the fallout around Epstein and Little St. James, his private island where many of his alleged crimes were committed, by extracting proceeds from the sale of the island, according to a press release from the USVI Attorney General. The Epstein estate and co-defendants were ordered by a USVI court to pay the territory’s government $105 million and half of the proceeds from the sale of the private island, as well as another $450,000 in environmental damages.

JPMorgan Chase announced June 12 that it had reached an agreement in a case involving victims of Epstein’s child sex trafficking operation. The case claims that JPMorgan Chase enabled Epstein’s child sex trafficking operation by keeping him as a client even though he was found guilty of sex crimes in the late 2000s.

When contacted by the Daily Caller News Foundation, JPMorgan Chase deferred to the statements made in the filing and pointed to previous statements, saying, “We all now understand that Epstein’s behavior was monstrous – any association with him was a mistake and we regret it. We would never have continued to do business with him if we believed he was using our bank in any way to help commit heinous crimes.”

The U.S. Virgin Islands’ Department of Justice did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Blue State School District Won’t Let Students Opt Out Of ‘Pride’ Lessons

Laurel Duggan on June 21, 2023

The Olympia School District (OSD) in Washington state is refusing to let students opt out of LGBT Pride curriculum and activities, a school representative told the Jason Rantz Show on KTTH in a written statement.

The district offers Pride-related lessons in schools as part of its “journey toward Gender-Inclusive Schools,” according to the OSD Pride Month Proclamation. An OSD spokesperson said the lessons are part of the educational standards and that there’s no opt-out process; student who skip the lessons will be marked for an unexcused absence, according to KTTH.

“The Olympia School District has no opt out process for Pride-related lessons as they are aligned with the standards that are required to be taught within our schools. OSD is committed to gender-inclusive schools, and we will follow the guidance of our governing agency, the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI),” a spokesperson told KTTH.

Pride lessons include Pride-themed songs, books with transgender characters and gender-neutral pronouns, parents told KTTH.

“The month of June is an opportunity to celebrate the narratives, identities, and contributions of those within the LGBTQIA+ community,” the Pride Month Proclamation read. “We recognize the struggle for equal rights continues today and are committed to expanded partnerships, policy reviews and updates, and opportunities to exercise learning courage that further our journey toward Gender-Inclusive Schools.”

OSD previously offered lessons on puberty blockers and preferred pronouns as part of curriculum created by Planned Parenthood, which included displays of pubic hair shaped to resemble animals.

A man identified by KTTH as Superintendent Patrick Murphy previously claimed in a June 2022 meeting that Pride lessons fulfilled the district’s commitment to standards on health, social and emotional learning and non-discrimination and argued that pulling students from these lessons was a burden on staff and an insult to other students.

“Acknowledging and celebrating the variety of backgrounds and families of our students and staff aligns with state and federal directives to ensure that we have gender inclusive schools and to provide a safe and nondiscriminatory environment,” he said. “To ask students, to ask staff to excuse students when those types of activities would occur, it’s not only disruptive to the learning environment and an undue burden, I would say, on staff. Much more importantly, it’s offensive and demeaning to the very students and staff who are protected.”

OSD did not respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

‘Oppressively White’: University’s Massive DEI Bureaucracy Still Not Enough For Student Activists

Reagan Reese on June 21, 2023

Despite the University of Michigan’s commitment to advancing diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), student activists are still not satisfied with the college’s efforts, according to the Chronicle of Higher Education.

Since launching its 10-year DEI plan in 2016, the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor has spent at least $85 million of initial funding with 163 people employed to advance the institution’s commitment to recruit a “diverse community” and “create an inclusive and equitable campus climate,” according to the Chronicle of Higher Education. Though the institution’s DEI efforts are one of the most ambitious in the country, black students are saying the school still is not meeting their needs, claiming they feel like “spokespersons” for their race.

Through the 2021-2022 school year, the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor’s black enrollment fell to 3.9%, the Chronicle of Higher Education reported. In response, the Black Student Union, a student group on campus, created a report detailing the university’s shortcomings and how it can begin to emphasize “anti-blackness” and restructure the “flaws of DEI that systemically neglect Black students.”

“DEI at the university, as it currently stands, is structurally flawed,” the Black Student Union wrote in its report. “85 million dollars was spent on DEI efforts and yet, Black students’ experience on campus has hardly improved. DEI is not and will never be effective until the needs of the most marginalized students are centered.”

The University of Michigan at Ann Arbor agreed to make revisions to “DEI 2.0,” the next phase of the institution’s initiative, based on the Black Student Union report, the Chronicle of Higher Education reported. In a survey of the institution’s students, fewer are satisfied with the school’s DEI efforts in 2021 than were in 2016 when the initiative began.

A university analysis shows that since beginning its DEI efforts, the school has increased the diversity of its students and faculty, added more diversity-based curriculum to its classes and grown its student population from low socioeconomic backgrounds. The University of Michigan at Ann Arbor has also implemented other diversity-based initiatives such as offering free tuition to low-income students, constructed a $10 million multicultural center, launched a tutoring program for low-income families and put faculty through an inclusive practice training, according to the Chronicle of Higher Education.

Despite the DEI efforts, a student at the institution told the Chronicle of Higher Education that the university feels “oppressively white.”

“When I feel more grounded, that’s when I can go out and interact with others,” the student told the outlet. “When I don’t feel grounded, I stay in my room and my grades suffer.”

Another student noted that even though the multicultural center is open to all students, she feels that white students should note that it “was founded as a result of Black activism, as a safe space for Black students,” the Chronicle of Higher Education reported. A University of Michigan at Ann Arbor graduate student wrote to the state Board of Regents in 2022 about the multicultural center, stating that “white student organizations [are] kicking black and brown students out of spaces within [the multicultural center] because their white organizations reserved the space.”

The letter stated that white students were “colonizing” in the multicultural center which was meant to be “a Mecca for students of color,” according to the Chronicle of Higher Education.

Across the nation, higher education institutions are pushing diversity efforts in their faculty and student recruitment processes; the University of California at Berkeley ranked its job applicants based on their commitment to furthering DEI within the institution and their research. The Indiana University School of Medicine updated its standards in May 2022 to require staff looking to be tenured to “show effort toward advancing DEI.”

Tabbye M. Chavous, the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor vice provost for equity and inclusion and chief diversity officer, makes an annual income of $380,000, the Chronicle of Higher Education reported.

The University of Michigan at Ann Arbor Office of DEI did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Drug Seizures Surged Along The Southern Border In May As Illegal Migration Dropped

Jennie Taer on June 21, 2023

Federal authorities stationed along the southern border seized roughly 40% more drugs in May compared to April as illegal migrant encounters decreased, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data.

CBP seized roughly 18,300 pounds of drugs in May at the U.S.-Mexico border compared to roughly 13,100 pounds of drugs in April, according to agency data. Meanwhile, illegal migrant encounters at the southern border dropped from roughly 183,000 in April to roughly 169,000 in May, according to federal data.

Overall, drug seizures along the southern border are down from roughly 193,000 pounds between October 2021 and May 2022 to roughly 164,000 pounds during that period in fiscal year 2023, according to CBP data. In April alone, CBP seized roughly 26,800 pounds of drugs at the southern border.

“As a result of comprehensive planning and preparation efforts, there has been a significant reduction in encounters along the Southwest border since the return to full Title 8 immigration enforcement on May 12. As we continue to execute our plans –including delivering strengthened consequences for those who cross unlawfully while expanding access to lawful pathways and processes– we will continue to monitor changes in encounter trends and adjust our response as necessary,” Senior Official Performing the Duties of CBP Commissioner Troy A. Miller said in a statement Tuesday of the decrease in illegal migrant encounters at the southern border.

“At the same time, CBP remained laser-focused on our national and economic security missions this month: managing increased passenger throughput at the start of a busy summer travel season and increasing seizures of dangerous drugs by 10% over April,” Miller said.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Christian Academy Files Lawsuit After State Says It Cannot Participate In Its Pre-K Program

Kate Anderson on June 21, 2023

A Christian preschool is suing Colorado education officials for refusing to allow them access to a universal preschool program because of their religious beliefs about gender and sexuality.

The Darren Patterson Christian Academy applied to Colorado’s new Universal Preschool Program (CUPP) for the 2023 school year and was initially approved before the July 1 deadline, but the Colorado Department of Early Childhood (CDEC) is refusing to allow the school to participate unless they agree to not share their faith, according to the lawsuit. In response, the school filed a lawsuit with Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) Tuesday against Executive Director of the CDEC Lisa Roy and Director of CUPP Dawn Odean for allegedly attempting to violate the school’s religious beliefs under the First Amendment.

“[T]he Colorado Department of Early Childhood is requiring religious preschools like Darren Patterson Christian Academy to forgo their religious character, beliefs, and exercise to participate in UPK,” the lawsuit reads. “So even though the school welcomes all families and children, these provisions would force it to hire employees who do not share its faith and to alter internal rules and policies that are based on the school’s religious beliefs about sexuality and gender, including those that relate to restroom usage, pronouns, dress codes, and student housing during school expeditions and field trips.”

Democratic Colorado Gov. Jared Polis signed a bill into law in April 2022 that created the new program to ensure that “every 4-year-old in the state” receives “at least 15 hours per week of state-funded preschool services for the upcoming school year,” according to the lawsuit.

The academy currently provides a biblically-based education, instructing students in the way of the Christian faith, and also asks employees to sign a “Lifestyle statement,” requiring them to be a “born-again Christian” and adhere to traditional views on marriage and sexuality, according to the lawsuit. As a result, the school was barred from accessing the state’s new program and the department declined to allow for a religious exemption because the school is not located in a house of worship.

The lawsuit requests that the court declare that the program’s anti-discrimination provisions violate the academy’s First Amendment rights.

“The Constitution is clear: The government may not deny participation in a public program simply due to a school’s internal religious exercise,” ADF Senior Counsel Jeremiah Galus said in a press release. “The U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed this principle in 2017, 2020, and 2022. Colorado officials are violating the school’s First Amendment rights by forcing it to abandon its religious beliefs—the reason why parents choose to send their kids to the school—to receive critical state funding.”

ADF and the CDEC and CUPP did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Merrick Garland Asked Point Blank If Hunter Deal Is A ‘Different Standard Of Justice’

Mary Lou Masters on June 21, 2023

U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland was asked directly whether the deal struck between President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, and the Department of Justice (DOJ) on federal gun and tax charges displays a “different standard of justice” at a news conference in Sweden on Wednesday.

Hunter Biden will avoid jail time by pleading guilty to two tax misdemeanors and entering a probation agreement for a gun charge with the DOJ, prompting criticism that the legal treatment wasn’t as harsh as former President Donald Trump’s. When asked about the degree of punishment Hunter Biden received, Garland referred the reporter to the U.S. Attorney on the case for questions about the investigation’s conclusion.

“From the moment of my appointment as attorney general, I would leave this matter in the hands of the United States Attorney, who was appointed by the previous president, and assigned to this matter by the previous administration, that he would be given full authority to decide the matter as he decided was appropriate, and that’s what he’s done,” Garland said, according to the video clip.

The charges brought against Hunter Biden follow a years-long investigation by the Federal District of Delaware into alleged failed tax payments and lying on a federal firearm application. Hunter Biden is also the subject of several other probes, including his highly-scrutinized business dealings when serving on the board of a Ukraine energy company.

Many Republican presidential candidates slammed the DOJ’s deal with Hunter Biden as a “sweetheart deal” and a “two-tiered system of justice,” including Trump, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and conservative radio personality Larry Elder. South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott argued Biden’s legal treatment was a “slap on the wrist,” and former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley said it poses more questions than answers.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

John Durham Dismisses A Laundry List Of Dems’ Trump-Russia Collusion Claims One-By-One

Arjun Singh on June 21, 2023

Special Counsel John Durham directly refuted claims by Democratic Congressmen that there was evidence former President Donald Trump colluded with Russia during the 2016 election, according to his testimony before the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday.

Durham was asked by Republican Rep. Kevin Kiley of California about accusations made by Democratic Reps. Jerry Nadler of New York as well as Ted Lieu, Eric Swalwell and Adam Schiff of California regarding Trump’s conduct both during the hearing and in the past on the record. He quoted statements made by the members and asked Mr. Durham to respond as to whether or not they were supported by the facts of the Mueller report, which he said they weren’t.

“Several people today…have attacked you. Mr. Nadler called your report a political exercise with ethical ambiguity. Mr. Lieu called you a partisan hack. It seems as though they are taking issue…with the conclusions of Mr. Mueller’s report, which…contradicted the statements made by those individuals on the record,” Kiley said, before asking Durham about whether Schiff’s statement regarding the evidence of collusion was accurate.

“Mr. Schiff made statements such as “The Russians offered help. The campaign accepted help. The Russians gave help and the president made full use of that help. That is pretty damning.” He also said that there was “plenty of evidence of collusion in plain sight…Are those statements supported by the report?,” asked Kiley, referring to the Mueller report.

“I don’t believe so,” Durham responded.

Kiley then quoted a statement by Nadler, that “the campaign colluded and there’s clear evidence that the president was involved. There was obviously a lot of collusion.” Durham replied that it was not supported by the facts of the Mueller report.

Following Nadler, Kiley referred to a statement by Lieu, who said that “the bombshell revelation that suggests that Trump associates may have colluded with the Russians means that we must pause the entire Trump agenda. We may have an illegitimate president occupying the White House.”

Durham told the committee that the Mueller report “did not” support Lieu’s claim. He also dismissed the claim made by Swalwell that there was “strong evidence of collusion” between Trump and Russia.

Nadler, Schiff, Swalwell and Lieu all serve on the House Judiciary Committee, with Nadler and Schiff having been physically present to hear their claims rebutted. During Kiley’s questioning, Schiff repeatedly asked “Would the gentleman yield?” to Kiley, for time to clarify his remarks, but Kiley refused to yield.

Durham appeared before the Judiciary Committee to testify about the conclusions of his report on his investigation into the origins of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation of Donald Trump’s campaign and its contacts with Russia during the 2016 election. The investigation of Trump produced no evidence that he had cooperated with Russia to win the election, and Durham’s investigation concluded that the FBI had acted without “strict fidelity to the law” in opening its investigation of Trump.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

TikTok Acknowledges Certain US Data Stored In China, Defends Earlier Claims

Jason Cohen on June 21, 2023

Popular short video platform TikTok has admitted to U.S. lawmakers that sensitive data from some Americans is stored in China, according to a letter the company sent on Friday.

While TikTok acknowledged that American creator data is stored in China, it defended previous statements that claimed the company does not store “protected user data” outside the U.S., in the letter it sent in response to inquiries from Republican Tennessee Sen. Marsha Blackburn and Democratic Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal. TikTok claimed that creators are not “typical users” as they seek to generate income on the platform, and said that it “stand[s] by the statements made by our company executives to Congress.”

“The American data has always been stored in Virginia and Singapore in the past,” TikTok CEO Shou Chew stated in his March testimony to the House Energy and Commerce Committee. However, a Forbes investigation discovered that TikTok housed financial data from its largest American and European creators in China, spurring Blackburn and Blumenthal to send questions to the company

“We appreciate this meaningful opportunity to offer clarity,” TikTok stated, adding its testimony referred to “protected user data collected in the app—not creator data.”

Forbes’ investigation revealed that tax documents, social security information and other financial data have been housed in China and that TikTok uses its Beijing-based parent company ByteDance’s payment tools, according to Forbes.

Forbes’ investigation appeared to pertain to contracts and other documents related to U.S. creators, TikTok said in the letter on Friday. “TikTok has been clear that there are certain, limited exceptions to the definition of protected data.”

The exception to American data storage in the U.S., “is really for interoperability purposes to make sure that the business can still operate and American users are still getting the benefit of a global platform,” Chew said during his March testimony.

However, Chew also said, “Data is stored here on American soil by an American company.” Additionally, he admitted that “Chinese engineers do have access to global data.”

“TikTok’s response makes it crystal clear that Americans’ data is still exposed to Beijing’s draconian and pervasive spying regimes—despite the claims of TikTok’s misleading public relations campaign,” Senators Blackburn and Blumenthal told Forbes.

TikTok and ByteDance did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Powell Says Interest Rate Hike Is Coming, Despite Pause Last Week

Jake Smith on June 21, 2023

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell said in a Wednesday statement that an increase in interest rates should be expected until progress is made on bringing down inflation.

Powell appeared before the House Financial Services Committee on Wednesday and told lawmakers that the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) is in agreement that interest rates will likely be raised through the end of the year, according to the prepared remarks. Powell’s statement is a shift from the FOMC’s decision last week to pause interest rate hikes for the first time in 15 months, according to Bloomberg.

“Nearly all FOMC participants expect that it will be appropriate to raise interest rates somewhat further by the end of the year,” Powell said, according to the prepared remarks. “But at last week’s meeting, considering how far and how fast we have moved, we judged it prudent to hold the target range steady to allow the Committee to assess additional information and its implications for monetary policy.”

Powell also said that the “economy is facing headwinds” due to “tighter credit conditions for households and businesses,” according to the remarks. He continued, saying that they are “likely to weigh on economic activity, hiring, and inflation” and that the “extent of these effects remains uncertain.”

Powell’s warning comes amidst an increase in unemployment rates, which hit 3.7% in May, and the inflation rate remains “well above” 2%, according to the remarks. The Federal Reserve is expected to increase interest rates from approximately 5 to 5.25% up to 5.6% by the end of the year, according to Bloomberg, and Powell noted that decisions will be made “meeting by meeting.”

“My colleagues and I understand the hardship that high inflation is causing, and we remain strongly committed to bringing inflation back down to our 2 percent goal,” Powell said. “We will continue to make our decisions meeting by meeting, based on the totality of incoming data and their implications for the outlook for economic activity and inflation, as well as the balance of risks.”

The Federal Reserve has spent the last two years fighting some of the highest inflation rates the U.S. has seen in four decades, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Powell said that inflation has “moderated” since last year, but noted the process of getting it back below 2% “has a long way to go.”

“We understand that our actions affect communities, families, and businesses across the country,” said Powell. “Everything we do is in service to our public mission.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

State Senate Overrides Democratic Governor’s Veto Of Bill Banning DEI Trainings

Jack Applewhite on June 21, 2023

The Republican-led North Carolina state Senate voted Tuesday to override Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper’s veto of a bill that bans diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) trainings at state agencies and institutions.

Cooper vetoed Senate Bill 364 on June 16, leading Republicans in the state Senate to vote 30-18 to override the veto, according to the state legislature’s website. The state House must also vote to override the veto before the bill can become law, but has not yet done so.

The bill would bar certain concepts from being promoted in state workplaces, including that “an individual, solely by virtue of his or her race or sex, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive,” and “the United States was created by members of a particular race or sex for the purpose of oppressing members of another race or sex,” according to its text. The bill would also prohibit state employers from “requiring an applicant for employment to endorse or opine about beliefs, affiliations, ideals, or principles regarding matters of contemporary political debate or social action.”

Cooper criticized the Republican state lawmakers on Twitter and claimed they were attempting to “eliminate unconscious bias training.”

The veto of Senate Bill 364 is one of four that the state Senate overrode on Tuesday, according to WRAL News. Other legislation that was overridden by the state Senate included bills focused on financial policies and tax laws.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

You can't access this website

Shore News Network provides free news to users. No paywalls. No subscriptions. Please support us by disabling ad blocker or using a different browser and trying again.