OSLO (Reuters) – Swedbank will book a provision of 40 million Swedish crowns ($3.72 million) related to an investigation by the U.S. Office for Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) over the bank’s “historical shortcomings”, the bank said on Friday.

The U.S. Treasury’s OFAC is investigating “transactions that the bank has notified the authority about”, Swedbank said in a statement.

“We can now assess the financial impact. The dialogue with OFAC is good. But we cannot say when it will be concluded,” said Tomas Hedberg, Swedbank’s deputy CEO.

Separate investigations by the Department of Justice (DoJ), the Securities and Exchange commission (SEC) and the Department of Financial Services in New York (DFS), are still ongoing, the bank said.

“Swedbank is holding separate discussions with them through our U.S. legal advisors,” it added.

The investigations are at different stages and the bank cannot at this time determine any financial consequences, nor when the investigations will be completed.

($1 = 10.7476 Swedish crowns)

(Reporting by Terje Solsvik, editing by Essi Lehto)

tagreuters.com2023binary_LYNXMPEJ29062-BASEIMAGE

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

SEOUL (Reuters) – South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol on Friday vowed to strengthen deterrence against North Korea’s threats by establishing a nuclear planning and implementation system with the United States.

Speaking at a commissioning ceremony for Naval academy graduates, the president also said South Korea will step up joint military drills with the United States.

(Reporting by Soo-hyang Choi; Editing by Himani Sarkar)

tagreuters.com2023binary_LYNXMPEJ2905L-BASEIMAGE

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

VATICAN CITY (Reuters) -The war in Ukraine is driven by the interests of several “empires” and not just of Russia’s, Pope Francis said in an interview published on Friday.

Francis said the conflict was fuelled by “imperial interests, not just of the Russian empire, but of empires from elsewhere”.

He expressed a readiness to talk to Russian President Vladimir Putin to call for peace.

The pontiff was speaking to Italian Swiss television RSI, in an interview due to be broadcast on Sunday. Extracts were published on Friday by Italian dailies La Repubblica, La Stampa and Corriere della Sera.

Francis, who is 86 and marks the 10th anniversary of his election on March 13, also said he would resign if he got too tired and lost the capacity to govern the Roman Catholic Church.

Last month, he had said that papal resignations should happen in only exceptional circumstances.

His predecessor Benedict XVI, who died on Dec. 31 aged 95, became the first pontiff to resign in about 600 years when he stepped down in 2013.

Asked what would lead him to make the same decision to quit, Francis said: “A tiredness that doesn’t make you see things clearly. A lack of clarity, of knowing how to evaluate situations”.

Francis said he was “a bit ashamed” to use a wheelchair due to a knee ailment.

“I am old. I have less physical resistance, the knee (problem) was a physical humiliation, even if the recovery is going well now,” he said.

(Reporting by Alvise Armellini, editing by Federico Maccioni, Robert Birsel)

tagreuters.com2023binary_LYNXMPEJ29057-BASEIMAGE

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

(Reuters) – Tesla Inc is pioneering a new battery manufacturing process called dry electrode coating that it is applying to its new 4680 battery cells.

The dry process, which Tesla obtained via its 2019 acquisition of California startup Maxwell Technologies, replaces a traditional, complicated step of battery manufacturing that involves coating the electrode foil with a wet, chemical slurry.

The coated foil needs to go through a lengthy drying process before final assembly, and the toxic solvents used in the slurry need to be recovered and disposed of.

The electric vehicle maker has said the dry coating process has the potential to dramatically reduce the size, cost, energy consumption and production cycle time of battery manufacturing plants, while boosting the energy density and power of battery cells.

Besides Maxwell, other companies working on dry coating include California-based LiCap Technologies and Massachusetts-based AM Batteries.

(Reporting by Paul Lienert in Detroit; Editing by Matthew Lewis)

tagreuters.com2023binary_LYNXMPEJ2904Z-BASEIMAGE

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

By Yoruk Bahceli and Naomi Rovnick

LONDON (Reuters) – Two years after inflation began its rapid ascent, investors, economists and policymakers remain divided on the path ahead.

Yes, headline inflation across major developed economies has retreated from multidecade highs, inflationary impulses from COVID-19 such as rocketing used car and semiconductor prices are fading, and Europe’s gas crisis has eased.

But jobs markets are tight and price pressures excluding volatile energy and food remain elevated.

The stakes are high for policymakers and traders, who have been repeatedly wrongfooted by inflation.

Here’s the case for and against inflation falling quickly towards the 2% level most central banks target.

CASE FOR A SWIFT RETREAT

1/ ENERGY PRICES

Tumbling energy prices are pulling down headline inflation.

With European natural gas prices at their lowest since August 2021, down 85% from last year’s peak, euro area inflation is no longer in double digits.

U.S. inflation rose 6.4% in January, the smallest rise since October 2021, from a 9.1% high last June.

China’s reopening has boosted oil prices. But at $83 a barrel, Brent crude is still down 40% from $139 hit just after Ukraine was invaded. It should average $89.23 this year, a Reuters poll shows.

2/ SUPPLY CHAINS SETTLE

Supply chain disruptions caused by COVID-19 and the war in Ukraine, key drivers of surging inflation, have eased sharply.

A New York Federal Reserve index suggests global supply chains have “returned to normal” as pressures are their lowest since before the pandemic, with China’s reopening from tight COVID-19 restrictions the latest source of improvement.

Oxford Economics’ lead economist Adam Slater notes that this Fed gauge leads inflation in the Group of Seven economies by around 12 months.

That implies G7 core inflation, excluding food and energy, could drop to around 2.5% by the end of the year and below 2% in early 2024, he estimates.

3/ WHAT WAGE PRICE SPIRAL?

Yes, labour markets are tight. But the employment cost index the Fed watches is slowing and posted its smallest rise in a year in the fourth quarter.

“If it’s a strong growing economy, where demand for workers vastly outstrips supply, you would expect to see those wages and employment costs ticking higher,” said ING chief international economist James Knightley.

Japan’s real wages fell the most in nearly nine years in January, while Italian wages rose just 1.1% in 2022 versus average inflation of 8.7%.

Even central bank hawks like Germany’s Joachim Nagel accept that no wage-price spiral is developing.

Instead, corporate profits have accounted for the lion’s share of domestic euro zone price pressures since 2021, ECB data shows. A recent IMF study going back to the 1960s found that only in a small minority of cases where wages and inflation rose together for several quarters did sustained inflation result.

CASE FOR STICKY INFLATION

1/ HISTORY LESSON

Since 1970, once price rises averaged 8% across 14 developed markets, it took at least six years for inflation to come back down to 3%, according to a Research Affiliates analysis.

London Business School data shows that inflation across 21 countries since 1900 spiked during wars and energy crises and was then followed by a series of smaller peaks instead of a clear downward trajectory.

“I would bet the house against inflation averaging, say, 2.5% for the next 10 years. It will be much higher,” said Frédéric Leroux, head of cross-asset at Carmignac.

A Reuters poll forecast U.S. headline inflation at 2.7% by the end of 2023, with estimates as high as 4.6%. Euro area inflation is seen anywhere between 2% and 5.2% by the end of the year.

2/ PAY DAY

A tight U.S. labour market suggests inflation stays sticky. Remember, the creation of 500,000 new jobs in January prompted a renewed ratcheting up of interest rate-hike bets.

Wage rises may not be driving inflation now, but the risk is that they will. Euro zone wage growth expectations among consumers are still rising, ECB data shows.

ECB policymakers have said that if high inflation persists, demands for pay matching inflation become more likely. Fed officials in February saw wage growth keeping services prices elevated.

Even in Japan, renowned for decades of deflation and stagnant pay, Uniqlo parent Fast Retailing has said it will raise wages by as much as 40%.

3/ CHINA FACTOR

China’s economic reopening will add to global price pressures as trade and travel boosts demand from the world’s largest commodities buyer.

The impact of this on energy prices is yet to be fully felt, said Idanna Appio, portfolio manager at First Eagle Investments and would build as Chinese travel returns.

Analysts polled by Reuters expect China to import a record amount of crude oil in 2023.

Chinese factories are now powering ahead. February manufacturing activity rose at the fastest pace in over a decade.

The chief executive of Gunvor, a top oil trader, sees oil prices rising in the second half of 2023 on renewed Chinese demand. Goldman Sachs expects China’s re-opening could eventually raise U.S. headline inflation by 0.5 percentage points.

(Reporting by Yoruk Bahceli and Naomi Rovnick; Editing by Dhara Ranasinghe and Hugh Lawson)

tagreuters.com2023binary_LYNXMPEJ280HU-BASEIMAGE

tagreuters.com2023binary_LYNXMPEJ280HT-BASEIMAGE

tagreuters.com2023binary_LYNXMPEJ280HV-BASEIMAGE

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

By Davide Barbuscia

NEW YORK (Reuters) – The Federal Reserve’s pledge to redouble its inflation-fighting efforts is spooking some investors, who believe it may end up moving too aggressively after moderating its stance a month ago.

Some also worry that the Fed’s messaging is becoming erratic as it reacts to successively weak then strong economic data.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell told U.S. lawmakers this week that the central bank would likely need to raise interest rates higher than expected in response to recent economic data that surprised on the upside.

Friday’s U.S. employment and next week’s inflation report would be key factors in determining whether policymakers would return to jumbo-sized rate increases after scaling back to a quarter-percentage-point hike last month, he said.

Some, however, believe the Fed risks making a policy mistake if it reacts to recent data with larger rate increases instead of waiting for the impact of higher rates to filter through the economy.

“Overall, we believe the Fed is behind the curve,” said Jay Hatfield, chief executive and portfolio manager at InfraCap in New York. “It’s too hawkish and will overtighten and produce more of a slowdown than is required.”

Worries of Fed overtightening are showing up in the ICE BofA MOVE Index, a measure of expected volatility in U.S. Treasuries that has shot back from a 10-month low and now stands near its highest level since December.

The S&P 500 is down some 3% since Powell’s first appearance before lawmakers on Tuesday, though it is still up around 2% for the year. Meanwhile, the inversion of the Treasury yield curve has extended to its widest since 1981, as short-term yields have surged above yields on longer-dated debt – a time-honored recession signal.

Money markets have priced in a return of the Fed to a 50 basis points hike at its next meeting on March 21-22 and a peak of about 5.7% in September, some 20 basis points higher than before Powell’s testimony. BlackRock, the world’s biggest asset manager, was among the slew of big Wall Street names raising their views for how high policy rates could go, with a forecast of 6%.

Volatility expectations in U.S. Treasuries rise again, https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-MARKETS/FED/xmvjkndjgpr/chart.png

For some investors, a return to 50 and 75 basis point rate increases may be a bridge too far.

“Investors fear the Fed is going to overdo it,” said Jack Ablin, chief investment officer at Cresset Capital. “It is like if you’re turning the hot water on but it takes a while to come through the nozzle …. If you keep turning that dial eventually you are going to burn yourself and I’m afraid the Fed is going to burn us.”

While the Fed’s words and actions are always closely followed by investors, market participants have been particularly focused on the central bank’s response to rising inflation pressures in the economy since the COVID-19 slowdown. Some have criticized it for being too slow in shifting its attention from fighting the pandemic economic shock to controlling prices.

Besides the risks of tightening monetary policy too far, some investors are concerned the Fed may lose investors’ trust if it steps up rate increases prematurely, said Troy Gayeski, Chief Market Strategist at FS Investments.

“One risk is that the Fed becomes so reactive to data that they bounce back and forth from ‘inflation is a real problem’ to ‘looks like it’s under control,’ … which obviously makes policy much more volatile and leads to more uncertainty,” said Gayeski.

Another risk, Gayeski said, is that a run of softer data could prematurely fan risk appetite by convincing investors that inflation was once again on the downswing.

Powell gave that impression to some investors last month, when, during his press conference after February’s monetary policy meeting, he repeatedly spoke about signs of “disinflation” that had begun to emerge. A spate of hotter than expected data would soon show that the economy was stronger than the Fed had expected.

The decision to shift to a smaller rate hike in February had followed encouraging data showing a slowdown in price pressures, and a potential return to more sizeable hikes is in line with the Fed’s guidance that its decisions would be data dependent.

At the same time, Powell on Wednesday offered some rationale for the benefits of slower rate hikes, saying that, after a year of rapid rises, the economy may still be adjusting.

But some believe shifts in the Fed’s view are adding to market uncertainty.

The Fed could enhance credibility with investors by sticking to its view that rates need to remain higher for longer, said Gargi Chaudhuri, Blackrock’s head of iShares investment strategy for the Americas.

“Instead of the 50 basis points versus 25 basis points … the real test that the Fed needs to pass in terms of convincing the market (is) that inflation has not significantly dropped enough for us to expect the Fed to begin cutting rates by the end of this year,” she said.

(Reporting by Davide Barbuscia; Additonal reporting by Stephen Culp and Chuck Mikolajczak; Editing by Ira Iosebashvili and Bradley Perrett)

tagreuters.com2023binary_LYNXMPEJ29055-BASEIMAGE

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

SURABAYA, Indonesia (Reuters) – An Indonesian court handed prison sentences to two soccer match officials on Thursday after finding them guilty of negligence over one of the world’s deadliest stadium stampedes.

The October 2022 derby match in Malang, East Java, between Arema FC and Persebaya Surabaya ended in chaos with 135 spectators killed, many crushed as they fled for exits after police fired tear gas into the crowd.

One match official, Abdul Haris, was found guilty “due to his negligence causing people to die and get severely injured”, judge Abu Achmad Shiddqi Hamsya said at the court in Surabaya. He was sentenced to a year and a half in prison.

The judges also found security officer Suko Sutrisno guilty of negligence and jailed him for one year.

Both men worked for Arema FC, and have been banned from soccer-related activities for life by the country’s football federation.

An investigation by Indonesia’s human rights commission found the main cause of the stampede was police firing into the crowd 45 rounds of tear gas, which soccer’s world governing body FIFA has banned as a crowd control measure.

Investigators also said the stadium was filled beyond capacity.

The lawyer for both match officials on Friday told Reuters they would not appeal the verdicts “as a form of moral responsibility” to the Arema FC fans and apologised to them.

One victim’s father, 52-year-old Miftahuddin, said the verdicts were “lacking”.

“How was that sentence so light?” he said, adding a tougher sentence would have given relief “to (his) daughter…who is in another realm”.

Three police officers are also charged with the same offences and their cases will be decided at a later date.

(Reporting by Prasto Wardoyo in Surabaya and Ananda Teresia, Stanley Widianto in Jakarta; Editing by Martin Petty, Kanupriya Kapoor)

tagreuters.com2023binary_LYNXMPEJ2808C-BASEIMAGE

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Row of prison cells in a cell block

‘Drop All Charges’: Blazing Chaos Breaks Out During Protest Outside Jail Housing Alleged Domestic Terrorists

Trevor Schakohl on March 9, 2023

People inside Georgia’s DeKalb County Jail broke windows and lit small objects on fire during a Wednesday evening protest decrying domestic terrorism charges levied against more than 20 people after a violent demonstration at a nearby police training center construction site,  according to local media.

The 23 people charged with domestic terrorism following the destructive Sunday protest at the forest site of the planned training center, unofficially dubbed “Cop City,” were booked in DeKalb County Jail, according to 11Alive, and DeKalb County Magistrate Judge Anna Davis later denied 22 of them bond but granted $5,000 bond to accused Southern Poverty Law Center Attorney Thomas Webb Jurgens. Individuals inside the jail broke cell windows and tossed out lit objects as the Wednesday night protest outside the jail occurred, with a small fire subsequently burning on a rooftop ledge, according to WSB-TV.

Demonstrators outside projected statements including “STOP COP CITY,” “DROP ALL CHARGES” and “FOREST DEFENSE IS SELF DEFENSE” on the building, Fox 5 Atlanta reported.

The SPLC said Monday that Jurgens was acting as a legal observer on the National Lawyers Guild’s (NLG) behalf when he was arrested, arguing his arrest was evidence of “heavy-handed law enforcement intervention against protesters” and not of a crime.

Prior to the Sunday incident, 19 people had already been charged with domestic terrorism since December for alleged conduct in opposition to the police training center, according to the AJC.

Protestors raged violently in Atlanta the weekend after left-wing activist Manuel Teran was fatally shot by police on Jan. 18 in the area of the police training center site, the outlet reported. Teran had allegedly disobeyed law enforcement instructions and fired his weapon during a police clearing operation, according to Atlanta News First.

The DeKalb County Sheriff’s Office did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

California County Tracked Churchgoers’ Phone Location Data To Enforce COVID Lockdowns

Katelynn Richardson on March 9, 2023

Santa Clara County deployed a variety of surveillance techniques on congregants of a local church that met during COVID-19, including tracking phone location data and parking a car in a nearby lot to observe behavior, court documents reported by independent journalist David Zweig reveal.

Inspectors from the county’s COVID-19 Business Compliance Unit spent a total of 51 hours conducting stakeouts near Calvary Chapel San Jose between November 25, 2020 and January 3, 2021, observing everything from Sunday services to baptisms and prayer groups, Zweig reported. Enforcement officers, who were paid $219 an hour, wrote in great detail about church activities, noting each violation of the mask mandate, social distancing policy and state-wide ban on singing.

Using cellular mobility data from a company called SafeGraph, which aggregates location data from 47 million devices nationwide to show movement patterns, the county also set up a geofence around the church building to track how many people visited each day, documents obtained by Zweig show. The county paid Stanford Law Professor Daniel Ho $800 an hour to analyze the data, determining there was a daily peak of 1,700 people visiting in early 2021.

County Counsel James Williams told Mercury News that the data is anonymized and not used to track the cellphones of individuals.

“It is unconscionable how much time and money this county has spent surveilling and targeting this church when they should be focused on rebuilding the community,” Mariah Gondeiro, an attorney for Calvary Chapel, told Mercury News.

A complaint filed by the church in 2021 says that several congregants “expressed to Pastor McClure they felt intimidated by the County enforcement officers’ persistent surveillance of church services” and “believed the County was going to order the police to arrest them for attending church.”

Calvary Chapel re-opened its church on May 24, 2020 after two months of being closed, defying the county’s mandates. It sued the county for violating its constitutional rights, which the county followed with its own lawsuit against the church in October 2020, arguing the church violated public health orders and failed to pay fines. The county is currently seeking $2.87 million in public health fines from Calvary Chapel in the ongoing lawsuit.

In August 2021, Grace Community Church, which also opened in defiance of the COVID-19 lockdown, secured a $800,000 settlement from the state of California and Los Angeles County after the Supreme Court ruled against California’s indoor worship ban.

Santa Clara County and County Counsel James R. Williams did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Biden To Call For More Gun Control In Town Rocked By Recent Mass Shooting

Bronson Winslow on March 9, 2023

President Joe Biden intends to head to California next week to continue calling for strict gun control measures, according to The New York Times.

Biden will visit Monterey Park, California, where a gunman killed 11 people at a Chinese Lunar New Year dance festival in January, taking the opportunity to call for additional gun control legislation, a White House official who was not authorized to speak publicly told the NYT. Biden previously used Monterey Park hero Brandon Tsay to call for a nationwide ban on “assault weapons” during his State of the Union Address in February, saying, “He saved lives. It’s time we do the same as well.”

“He thought he was going to die, but then he thought about the people inside. In that instant, he found the courage to act and wrestled the semi-automatic pistol away from a gunman who had already killed 11 people at another dance studio,” Biden said at the time. “Ban assault weapons now.”

Biden has continually called for  “assault weapon” bans following the signing of the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act in June, which implemented funding for red flag laws. The Biden administration’s Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) implemented bans on pistol braces and ghost gun parts in 2022, while also cracking down on gun dealers with a “zero tolerance” policy.

In March, Biden’s gun agenda began to slip, as a federal judge ruled that the ghost gun rule, proposed at Biden’s request, was likely unconstitutional. It caused an undue burden on the parts maker, according to the temporary injunction.

In early March, Biden once again called for an assault weapons ban “come hell or high water” during a House Democratic Caucus Issues Conference in Baltimore, Maryland.

“I know it may make some of you uncomfortable, but that little state above me, Delaware, is one of them, has the highest rate, one of the highest rates of gun ownership. But guess what? We’re going to ban assault weapons again come hell or high water and high capacity magazines. When we did it last time it reduced mass deaths,” Biden said during the conference.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

‘Party Of Working People’: JD Vance Implores Fellow Republicans To Support Bipartisan Railroad Bill

Alexa Schwerha on March 9, 2023

  • The U.S. Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works held a hearing on Thursday about a toxic train derailment that occurred in East Palestine, Ohio, in February.
  • Republican Ohio Sen. JD Vance called on Republicans to support his bipartisan bill to increase railroad regulations in response to the derailment.
  • “Do we do the bidding of a massive industry that is in bed with big government or do we do the bidding of the people who elected us to the Senate and to the Congress in the first place?” he asked.

Republican Ohio Sen. JD Vance delivered a passionate plea Thursday morning before the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works (EPW), calling on Republicans to back his bipartisan bill to strengthen railroad safety.

Vance spoke alongside Democratic Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown and Democratic Pennsylvania Sen. Bob Casey on a panel during the Thursday-morning hearing regarding the Feb. 3 Norfolk Southern train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio, that spilled toxic chemicals into the air and water, according to livestream of the hearing. Vance implored Republicans who may be hesitant to be the “party of the working people” and support a bipartisan bill to bolster railroad safety.

“We are the party of firefighters, of police officers, of people who go to work, pay their taxes, fight our country’s wars and keep our communities safe. We are proud of that and we should be proud of that … but now we are faced with choice within legislation and how we respond to this crisis,” Vance said during his opening statement. “Do we do the bidding of a massive industry that is in bed with big government or do we do the bidding of the people who elected us to the Senate and to the Congress in the first place? I believe we are the party of working people, but it’s time to be the party of working people.”

The Railway Safety Act of 2023 would require carriers to make emergency response plans and notify state officials before trains carrying hazardous materials can enter a town and require a two-person minimum train crew. The legislation would mandate hazardous material training for first responders and better wheel bearing maintenance to detect overheating, which was identified as the cause of the derailment according to a preliminary report by the National Transportation Safety Board.

Casey and Brown both called on Norfolk Southern CEO Alan Shaw to announce his support for the bill during their allotted time on Thursday, while Vance turned his attention inward and shared his concern “that there has been a movement in [his] party and in [his] movement, in response to the legislation that [he’s] proposed, that would not hold Norfolk Southern or the rail industry accountable.”

“This is an industry that enjoys special subsidies that almost no industry enjoys. This is an industry that enjoys special legal carveouts that almost no industry enjoys,” Vance said. “This is an industry that just three months ago had the federal government come in and save them from a labor dispute, it was effectively a bailout, and now they’re claiming before the Senate and the House that our … reasonable legislation is somehow a violation of the free market? Well pot, meet the kettle because that doesn’t make an ounce of sense. You cannot claim special government privileges, you cannot ask the government to bail you out and then resist basic public safety.”

Vance doubled down that the bill proposes “reasonable public safety enhancements” and that his comments were geared toward Republicans who “seem to think that any public safety enhancements for the rail industry is somehow a violation of the free market.”

He said that argument is a “farce.”

Shaw and several federal, state and local officials also testified before the committee.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

‘So-Called Journalists’: Dem Lawmaker Claims Reporters Who Broke ‘Twitter Files’ Are A ‘Threat’

Jason Cohen on March 9, 2023

Democratic Del. Stacey E. Plaskett, who represents the United States Virgin Islands, attacked witnesses Matt Taibbi and Michael Shellenberger, two journalists who broke the Twitter Files, at a House Judiciary Committee hearing Thursday, characterizing them as dangerous and a “threat” to former Twitter employees.

Plaskett characterized Taibbi and Shellenberger as “two of Elon Musk’s ‘public scribes’” and said Republicans brought them in “to release cherry-picked out-of-context emails and screenshots designed to promote his chosen narrative — Elon Musk’s chosen narrative — that is now being parroted by the Republicans” for political gain.

Plaskett also called the witnesses “so-called journalists” and said they have threatened former Twitter employees by reporting on the Twitter Files.

Plaskett stated, “I want to underscore the very real threat posed by Twitter Files and by the witnesses in front of us today. Here’s Yoel Roth describing the harassment he and other former Twitter employees have faced because of the irresponsible way in which the witnesses in front of us and others have released this cherry-picked and out-of-context data.”

She then showed a video of Yoel Roth testifying about threats against him and other employees, saying people attacked him as well as junior employees after Elon Musk shared an allegation that Roth supports or condones pedophilia.

“Those were the consequences of this type of harassment and speech,” Roth said.

Roth was previously criticized for a past tweet suggesting Donald Trump was an “actual Nazi.”

“I’m not exaggerating when I say you have called two witnesses who pose a direct threat to people who oppose them,” Plaskett said after the video.

She heard the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Republican Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio laughing and asked, “It’s funny … when people have to go through that?”

Jordan said, “It’s crazy what you were just saying.”

Plaskett then compared the Twitter Files to Kevin McCarthy giving Tucker Carlson Jan. 6 footage.

“This is a new Republican playbook apparently,” she said.

She concluded her opening statement by saying big tech and big government collusion is a “false narrative” and “we are going to tell the truth.”

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

DeSantis Up Double-Digits On Trump In Their Home State GOP Primary: POLL

Mary Lou Masters on March 9, 2023

Former President Donald Trump is down 25 percentage points while Gov. Ron DeSantis takes the top spot for the 2024 GOP nomination in their home state, a new Florida state primary poll shows.

DeSantis led a crowded field of ten contenders with 52% of registered Florida Republicans’ support, followed by the former president at 27%, according to a University of North Florida poll released Thursday. In a head-to-head matchup, the governor’s chances grew with a 31 percentage point margin ahead of Trump.

Declared candidate and former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, former Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney and former Vice President Mike Pence garnered 4%, 3% and 2% respectively.

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz received 1% and former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott, South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem and New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu ended up with less than 1%.

In the same survey, respondents were asked who they would vote for in the general presidential election between President Joe Biden and either DeSantis or Trump. The governor won against Biden with a slightly wider margin than Trump at 9 percentage points.

Half of the respondents said they had a very or somewhat favorable opinion of DeSantis, and 43% said the same for Biden.

The Floridians were also asked about several pieces of proposed legislation, as the state’s legislative session began this week. A majority of Florida voters disagree with a bill that would ban abortion after six weeks, with 75% saying they somewhat or strongly oppose it.

The poll surveyed 1,452 registered Florida voters, of which 550 were registered Republicans, and was taken from Feb. 25 – Mar. 7 with a margin of error of 2.57 percentage points.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

‘Racism And Oppression’: Anti-Israel Activists Hold Event At CUNY In Protest Of University’s Antisemitism Investigation

Kate Anderson on March 9, 2023

Students and faculty at the City University of New York (CUNY) are hosting a “People’s Hearing on Racism and Repression” Thursday to “hold the university accountable” for investigating claims of antisemitism on campus from Jewish students and groups, according to an event document.

CUNY has been under scrutiny for a rash of antisemitic incidents on campus, and the New York City Council’s higher education committee held a hearing to listen to Jewish students’ experiences and concerns, according to the Times of Israel. In response, 27 groups, the majority being pro-Palestinian, organized a “People’s Hearing on Racism and Repression” to take place on March 9, accusing the university of allowing “anti-Palestinian racism, anti-Blackness, Islamophobia” by implementing policies suggested by many pro-Jewish groups, according to the event document.

“The hearing was the result of pressure by right-wing groups who made it clear that their aim was to force CUNY to adopt policies that would in effect erase any mention of Palestine from the university space in direct response to successful Palestine liberation organizing across the university,” the document read. “As such, we felt strongly that what was needed was in fact a different hearing – a People’s Hearing – to hold the university accountable to its students and workers, and to the wider community in which it is embedded.”

The event is being held at CUNY’s Graduate Center to network and protest “institutionalized racism, transphobia, sexism, ableism, colonialism and imperialism,” according to the document. CUNY recently launched an online portal for students to report “community acts of discrimination and retaliation” in an effort to combat rising anti-Jewish sentiment but the documents argues that both the university, the FBI and the NYPD are complicit in “over-policing” creating a “psychologically distressing and physically unsafe environment” for those ” resisting discrimination.”

However, no mention is made in the document of the anti-Jewish and antisemitic issues brought by Jewish students over the past year. Jewish students and faculty have raised concerns regarding antisemitic comments about “Jewish white privilege” and Jewish power tropes from professors and classmates, prompting the Department of Education to step in and investigate CUNY’s Brooklyn College in 2022, according to a report from StopAntisemitism.

Among the co-sponsors of the event are Jewish Voices for Peace, which has been classified by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) as a “radical anti-Israel activist group” that supports the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement that targets businesses and individuals who support Israel.

“JVP considers supporters of Israel, or even critics of Israel who do not hew to JVP’s own extreme views, to be complicit in Israel’s purported acts of racist oppression of Palestinians,” ADL states. “JVP leaders believe that expressing support for Israel, or not challenging mainstream Jewish organizations that support Israel, must also be viewed as an implicit attack on people of color and all marginalized groups in the United States.”

CUNY and People’s Hearing on Racism and Repression at CUNY did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

JENNY BETH MARTIN: Will Democrats Ever Get A Grip On Rampant Crime Plaguing Their Cities?

Jenny Beth Martin on March 9, 2023

Most people don’t go to Realtor.com for crime statistics. But they could. If they did, what they’d find would be very revealing — it would show that some of America’s biggest crime-wave cities also happen to be the ones now experiencing mass exoduses. Philadelphia, Chicago, San Francisco, Detroit, New York and Seattle all saw more people migrate out last year than migrated in, and crime had a lot to do with it.

That people are leaving high-crime areas shouldn’t be surprising.

In Philadelphia, gun violence levels have risen to and remained at record highs for three straight years.

In Chicago, crime has gotten so far out of control that a liberal Democrat mayor running for reelection was defeated with just 17% of the vote in a multicandidate primary. That’s the first time in 40 years that a sitting mayor running for reelection has been beaten in the Second City.

In San Francisco, surging crime rates — and the liberal, George Soros-funded district attorney’s failure to prosecute criminals, incentivizing further crime — led to that particular district attorney’s historic recall before he even finished his first term.

In New York, Mayor Eric Adams — elected on a tough-on-crime platform by a population so desperate for relief from surging violent crime that it was willing to think outside the box to elect him — this week called on business owners to insist that customers remove face masks upon entering their businesses: “Do not allow people to enter the store without taking off their face mask … When you see these mask-wearing people, oftentimes it’s not about being fearful of the pandemic. It’s fearful of the police catching [them] for their misdeeds.”

And in Seattle, the recent annual police report showed that violent crime there hit a 15-year high last year.

It’s not just individuals and families moving out because of the surging crime. Businesses are, too, for the same reason.

In Portland, Walmart has announced it will close all its stores within the city limits, and will offer new jobs at stores outside the city limits to the more than 500 employees its decision will displace.

In Chicago, McDonalds’ CEO says he’s having trouble recruiting executives to work in the company’s downtown national headquarters office. Boeing, Citadel, and Caterpillar, too, have announced they’re leaving Chicago.

In Philadelphia, meanwhile, McDonalds is closing locations in downtown areas.

And in Seattle, the city settled for $3.65 million with locals who sued the city after its police abandoned them to rioters in the summer of 2020.

What do these cities all have in common? They’re all run by liberals. And they’ve all been run by liberals for the better part of the last 60 years.

And over the last several years in particular, of course, they’ve also been subject, in one form or another, to “defund the police” pressure from left-wing activists, which exploded in the wake of the 2020 death of George Floyd at the hands of police in Minneapolis — a city which, for the record, has also seen a not-at-all-surprising surge in violent crime as its police force has shrunk by 40%.

It’s important to recognize that the “defund the police” isn’t just about money. it’s about a culture of policing, and whether police forces are actually allowed to do the work necessary to protect a community.

Progressive policing policies always run into their biggest opponent — reality. Reality is unbending. It’s predictable. It’s consistent. If criminals think they can get away with looting, they will loot. If they think they can get away with carjacking, they will carjack.

Which brings us to the District of Columbia. D.C. experimented with defunding the police. The result was predictable, and predicted. Crime surged, and it’s only gotten worse — as D.C. police statistics show, homicides are up 31%, motor vehicle theft is up 110% and all crime is up 25% over this same period a year ago.

Yet, even in the wake of this surging crime, the D.C. City Council, in its infinite wisdom, chose to double down by revising the city’s criminal code to REDUCE the penalties for many crimes, including carjackings. That was too much for even a liberal like Mayor Muriel Bowser, who vetoed the measure. But the City Council was so determined to make its stand that it overrode her veto, by a vote of 12-1.

Luckily for the tourists visiting and the residents of the District of Columbia, home rule — instituted in 1973 — does not override the Constitution, which gives Congress ultimate control over the District. The House has already voted to overturn the City Council’s action, the Senate did so Wednesday (by an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 81-14, no less) and President Joe Biden, clearly worried about the negative political consequences of surging crime being laid at the feet of Democrats — has declared he will not veto the measure if it reaches his desk.

If Biden signs the resolution, it will be the first time in 32 years that Congress has overturned a D.C. law.

The United States is built on the concept that ours is a nation of laws. Being a nation of laws is totally incompatible with having utter lawlessness rule our nation’s urban areas, and especially our nation’s capital city.

Jenny Beth Martin is Honorary Chairman of Tea Party Patriots Action.

The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller News Foundation.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Biden Budget Calls For End Of Federal Oil And Gas Subsidies

John Hugh DeMastri on March 9, 2023

President Joe Biden called for an end to all subsidies to oil and gas companies, in addition to all “other tax preferences,” in a proposal for the federal government’s 2024 budget released Thursday.

While the exact cost of oil and gas subsidies is unclear due to the myriad ways the incentives interact with the U.S. tax code, estimates typically range from $10 billion to $50 billion per year, according to Reuters. The Biden administration estimates that ending subsidies would save $31 billion annually, according to a White House fact sheet.

“The President is committed to ending tens of billions of dollars of Federal subsidies for oil and gas companies, leveling the playing field for clean energy,” the White House fact sheet reads. “Oil companies had record profits in 2022 and undertook record stock buybacks that benefited executives and wealthy shareholders, all while continuing to benefit from tax subsidies worth billions of dollars.”

The Inflation Reduction Act, a cornerstone Biden administration climate bill, offers roughly $369 billion in subsidies to wind, solar and battery production for clean energy initiatives. The cost of battery subsidies alone has been estimated to be roughly $136 billion over the next ten years by private analysts, more than four times the administration’s initial estimates.

The president’s proposed budget would invest $52.2 billion in discretionary funding to combat climate change, a $10.9 billion jump in funding from 2023, according to a White House fact sheet.

The cuts would be part of a broader movement in the president’s proposed budget to reduce the tax breaks for “special interest” industries, including real estate and cryptocurrency brokers, according to a White House fact sheet.

Biden repeatedly criticized oil and gas companies’ profits in 2022, and called for Congress to pass legislation quadrupling taxes on stock buybacks in his State of the Union address in February. Despite approving a historically low amount of drilling on federal land, the president has claimed that the spike in gas prices following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine could have been avoided if oil and gas companies had expanded production, an argument energy firms have pushed backagainst, citing record throughput at certain refineries.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Biden Budget Includes $100 Million To Help Schools Increase ‘Racial And Socioeconomic Diversity’

Reagan Reese on March 9, 2023

The Biden administration’s 2024 fiscal year budget, totaling $6.8 trillion, includes millions to help increase “racial and socioeconomic diversity” within the nation’s K-12 schools.

The budget allotted $100 million to the Department of Education (ED) for a grant program that would fund community “voluntary efforts” to “foster diverse schools.” In total, the budget requests $90 billion for the ED, some of which would address “racial isolation and concentrated poverty” within K-12 schools.

“Racial isolation and concentrated poverty in schools can undermine their ability to provide an equal opportunity for all students to learn and succeed,” the budget stated. “The Budget includes $100 million for a grant program to support voluntary efforts by communities interested in developing and implementing strategies to promote racial and socioeconomic diversity in their schools.”

The “foster diverse schools” program began in 2023, when the ED received $100 million to “develop and implement strategies” to increase “racially and socioeconomically diverse schools and classrooms.” The program is an effort to mend “the well-documented, persistent negative effects of racial isolation and concentrated poverty.”

The budget would give the ED $578 million to increase “school-based counselors, psychologists, social workers and other health professionals” within K-12 schools and colleges to help address the “lingering impacts of [the] COVID-19 pandemic.”

“Just as physical health and nutrition is critical to learning, so too is mental health,” the budget stated. “The lingering impacts of COVID-19 pandemic disruptions have taken a heavy toll on the physical and mental health of many students, teachers and school staff. Research shows that students who receive social, emotional and mental and behavioral supports perform better academically.”

The ED did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Biden Budget Requests $500 Million For Two Years Of Free Community College

Alexa Schwerha on March 9, 2023

President Joe Biden’s proposed fiscal year 2024 budget includes $500 million in discretionary funding to provide two years of free community college, according to the document released on Thursday afternoon.

The funding will support a program to provide two years of free community college for students “enrolled in high-quality programs that lead to a four-year degree or a good-paying job,” the budget reads. The total proposal tallies $6.8 trillion, which is $1 trillion higher than was requested during Fiscal Year 2023.

The budget includes two years of subsidized tuition for families who make less than $125,000 if the student is enrolled in a four-year Historically Black College and University (HBCU), Tribally Controlled College and University (TCCU) or a Minority-Serving Institution (MSI), according to its text. It also boosts the discretionary maximum Pell Grant to $500, building on previous legislative efforts to increase the maximum by $900 over the past two years.

Increasing the Pell Grant would help “low and middle-income students overcome financial barriers to postsecondary education” and would expand access to $6.8 million students, according to the budget. The budget also “provides a path to double the maximum award by 2029.”

Biden touted two years of free community college on the campaign trail while taking on former Republican President Donald Trump ahead of the 2020 presidential election. While the promise has not yet come to fruition, Biden referenced the goal during his 2023 State of the Union in February.

“Let’s finish the job and connect students to career opportunities starting in high school and provide access to two years of community college, some of the best career training in America, in addition to being a pathway to a four-year degree,” Biden said. “Let’s offer every American the path to a good career whether they go to college or not.”

The proposal also includes $2.7 billion for the Office of Federal Student Aid, a $620 million increase from the 2023 enacted level, to help student loan borrowers ahead of repayments which are expected to resume after the Supreme Court rules on the legality of Biden’s student loan forgiveness plan.

It also increases funding for HBCUs, TCCUs, MSIs and under-resourced institutions and community colleges by $429 million above the 2023 enacted level. The proposal would also allocate $200 million for a program to help high school students transition to higher education and funding to “improve the retention, transfer and completion rates of students” through various student success programs.

The White House and the Department of Education did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Biden’s Budget Proposes Massive Funding Increase For Federal Crackdown On Guns

Bronson Winslow on March 9, 2023

President Joe Biden’s proposed budget for fiscal year 2024 proposes increasing funding to the FBI, Department of Justice (DOJ), and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to crack down on guns.

The funding, which draws from a $17.8 billion “investment” in the DOJ’s federal law enforcement capacity, will be used to further regulate the firearms industry, create gun trafficking strike forces, enforce background checks and implement the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, according to the budget. The ATF alone will receive $1.9 billion, a $200 million increase from the 2023 budget.

Alongside the DOJ and ATF, the FBI will receive $51 million to support the continued implementation of enhanced background checks required by the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act. The Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, implemented in 2022, provided funding for the implementation of red flag laws, expanded background checks and invested in state crisis intervention orders, according to the legislation.

Since the passing of the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, the ATF, per Biden’s request, has implemented two final rules and heightened requirements for gun dealers. The pistol stabilizing brace finale rule and the ghost gun parts final rule received backlash after their implementations, with the ghost gun parts final rule currently subject to a temporary injunction by a federal judge.

The ATF’s “zero tolerance” police has been criticized by Republican lawmakers and Second Amendment advocacy groups, as Federal Firearm License (FFL) revocations hit a 16-year high in 2022 under the rule. The increase in license revocations, 92 in 2022 alone, is due to the new policy and the updated procedure that the ATF follows, as they no longer always go through a multi-step process, often opting to pull licenses for a multitude of “willful” violations.

“That’s not how regulatory agencies are supposed to work in the sector that they’re supposed to regulate. They are supposed to help the companies, they’re supposed to ensure compliance but they’re not supposed to punish and destroy an entire industry based on just political opposition or political distaste,” Gun Owners of America’s director of federal affairs Aidan Johnston told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Proposed Biden Defense Budget Includes Largest Military Pay Raise In Decades

Micaela Burrow on March 9, 2023

Military servicemembers and Department of Defense (DOD) civilian personnel would receive an average 5.2% pay raise in President Joe Biden’s budget request for 2024, released Thursday.

The proposed pay increase is the largest in more than 20 years and comes as members of Congress worry that up to 25% of military servicemembers report facing food insecurity, according to a statement from DOD and research from the RAND Corporation, a government contractor. It’s also larger in percentage terms than the pay raise authorized in the budget for 2023, but well below average inflation rates.

“[The] budget provides an average pay increase of 5.2% for civilian and military personnel — and answers the president’s call for agencies to lead by example in supporting federal worker organizing and collective bargaining,” the Biden budget states.

DOD said the budget would promote a “lethal, resilient, survivable, agile, and responsive” force in the statement.

A summary of the budget includes annual rate increases for housing and basic needs allowances, with a more specific breakdown set to become available from the Pentagon on Monday.

“This is a strategy-informed budget,” Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin said in a statement. “This budget invests in taking care of our people with the largest military pay raise in over 20 years, and the largest civilian pay raise in over 40 years.”

However, both Democrats and Republicans have argued that military pay raises should keep pace with inflation.

“While Congress was able to deliver a 4.6% across the board pay increase to all service members, I believe it may be time we consider reevaluating whether there are additional ways that could help deliver important support to our servicemembers and their families,” House Armed Services Committee ranking member Andy Kim of New Jersey said in his opening remarks at a hearing on military personnel and quality of life Tuesday.

Republican Rep. Mike Waltz of Florida, a retired Army officer, concurred, saying he hoped for a measure tying military pay to inflation rates.

While Congress authorized a 4.2% pay raise in the defense budget for 2023, a separate Basic Needs Allowance provision only benefited a very small percentage of servicemembers, Kim said.

Democrats in Congress have also advocated for an even larger pay raise, according to Government Executive. Legislation Democratic Rep. Gerry Conolly of Virginia and Democratic Sen. Brian Schatz introduced separately in January would provide an average 8.7% raise for all federal employees.

“With inflation affecting everything from gas prices to groceries to rent, some Soldiers and their families are finding it harder to get by on the budgets they’ve set and used before,” Sgt. Maj. of the Army Michael A. Grinston said in August.

Biden’s proposed defense spending tops out at $842 billion, $26 billion higher than enacted for fiscal year 2023 and exceeding expectations.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Cartel Apologizes For Kidnapping And Killing Americans, Turns Over Its Own Members For ‘Lack Of Discipline’: REPORT

Jennie Taer on March 9, 2023

A letter from a group claiming to be a Mexican cartel responsible for the recent killings of two Americans in Matamoros offered an apology on behalf of its own members for the attack, according to The Associated Press.

The Gulf cartel’s Scorpions faction wrote an apology to the residents of Matamoros, where four Americans were kidnapped, two of which were killed, the AP reported. The Americans were kidnapped Friday in the Mexico border town across from Brownsville, Texas.

“We have decided to turn over those who were directly involved and responsible in the events, who at all times acted under their own decision-making and lack of discipline,” the letter reads.

The letter also stated that those involved went against the cartel’s rules of “respecting the life and well-being of the innocent.”

The victims were traveling from South Carolina for one to get a tummy tuck procedure. Gunmen opened fire on the group and placed them in a vehicle before armed men took them away from the scene, according to the U.S. Embassy in Mexico.

The two surviving victims, identified as Latavia “Tay” McGee and Eric James William, were returned to the U.S. and rushed to a Brownsville hospital. McGee was wounded and William had a bullet in his leg, USA Today reported.

The Gulf cartel is heavily involved in drug trafficking and gaining control over law enforcement, according to the Department of Justice (DOJ).

Matamoros is considered a “Level 4” area by the U.S. State Department, which advises against Americans travelling there due to “crime and kidnapping.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

‘Twitter Files’ Hearing Descends Into Anarchy As Dems Push Journalist To Reveal His Sources

Jason Cohen on March 9, 2023

Democrats went after journalist Matt Taibbi in an attempt to pressure him to reveal his sources relating to the Twitter Files at a House Judiciary Committee hearing Thursday.

Democratic Rep. Sylvia Garcia of Texas said she wanted to follow up on questions from ranking member Democratic Del. Stacey E. Plaskett of the Virgin Islands and asked Taibbi when Elon Musk first contacted him regarding writing the Twitter files. When Taibbi hesitated, Garcia said, “I just need a date, sir.”

“But I can’t give it to you unfortunately because this is a question of sourcing and I don’t give up — I’m a journalist — I don’t reveal my sources,” Taibbi responded.

Taibbi is a left-leaning award-winning author and investigative reporter and one of the journalists who has participated in posting the Twitter Files, which are internal Twitter documents revealing alleged wrongdoing between Twitter and government agencies. Musk promoted the public release of the Twitter Files after taking over the company.

Garcia retorted that it’s a question of chronology and not sourcing, but Taibbi told her that it is in fact a question of sourcing. Garcia cut him off, stating, “Because you earlier said that someone had sent you through the internet some message about whether you would be interested in some information.”

“Yes, and I referred to that person as a source,” Taibbi explained.

Garcia then asked when Elon Musk first approached Taibbi, inferring Elon Musk was the source.

“Again, congresswoman, you’re asking a journalist to reveal his sources,” Taibbi persisted.

“So then you consider Mr. Musk to be the direct source of all this?” Garcia asked.

Taibbi responded that is not what he was saying and told Garcia she was attempting to persuade him to say Musk was the source. He said he cannot answer that question.

“If you’re telling me you can’t answer because it’s your source then the only logical conclusion is that he is in fact your source,” Garcia said.

Taibbi responded that Garcia was free to conclude that.

Garcia then said she did not understand and that Taibbi “can’t have it both ways.”

The chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Republican Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio chimed in and loudly stated, “No, he can. He’s a journalist.”

“No he can’t,” Plaskett said. “Because either Musk is the source and he can’t talk about it or Musk is not the source, and if Musk is not the source, then he can discuss his conversations with the source.”

The hearing then descended into chaos with members speaking over one another.

“What he has said is that he is not going to reveal his source and the fact that Democrats are pressuring him to do is such a violation of the First Amendment,” Jordan said.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Biden’s Budget Hands Another $1.6 Billion To UN’s Green Climate Fund

Mary Lou Masters on March 9, 2023

President Joe Biden’s proposed budget would give $1.6 billion to the U.N.’s Green Climate Fund (GCF) to boost clean energy initiatives and combat global climate change.

The President’s Emergency Plan for Adaptation and Resilience would “quadruple” the United States’ financing of foreign climate initiatives by requesting more than $3 billion in funds, according to the proposed budget announced Thursday. Along with the contribution to the GCF, $1.2 billion will be loaned to the Clean Technology Fund (CTF).

“The Budget also advances new tools, such as loan guarantees, to reassert U.S. leadership in the Indo-Pacific by financing energy security and infrastructure projects and reducing reliance on volatile energy supplies and prices. The Budget also builds resilience to better prepare for and respond to extreme weather events and other disasters,” the budget reads.

The GCF is a massive international climate fund that assists developing countries in achieving reduced emissions, additionally calling upon them to help fund these initiatives to curb the threat of climate change. The CTF finances clean energy technology in developing countries aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions over time by modernizing their energy systems.

Biden’s budget also called for an end to all government subsidies for oil and gas companies to save $31 billion every year and pave the way for cleaner energy sources.

“Oil companies had record profits in 2022 and undertook record stock buybacks that benefited executives and wealthy shareholders, all while continuing to benefit from tax subsidies worth billions of dollars,” the White House fact sheet reads.

Biden’s budget would finance $52.2 billion into combating global climate change, a $10.9 billion hike from 2023, according to the fact sheet.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Biden’s Budget More Than Doubles Funding For Offshore Projects, Potentially ‘Putting American Fisherman Out Of Business’

Katelynn Richardson on March 9, 2023

Biden’s budget allocates $60 million to expand the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) offshore wind projects, an initiative fishermen say will damage their businesses and environmental groups warn could be killing whales.

The funding is intended to support the administration’s goal of deploying 30 gigawatts of offshore wind capacity by 2030, which it states will generate enough energy to power 10 million homes for a year. Experts warn that wind projects disrupt the whale’s habitats and generate disorienting noise, factors that could be contributing to a recent increase in whale deaths. So far, their requests for the Biden administration to investigate have been fruitless.

The 2024 budget allocation for offshore wind is $39 million higher than what was enacted in 2023, according to the budget.

“This would allow NOAA to use the best available science to help meet the goal of deploying 30 gigawatts of offshore energy by 2030 while protecting biodiversity and promoting sustainable ocean co-use,” the budget states.

Fishermen are also sounding the alarm on offshore wind efforts.

“Offshore wind will put American fishermen out of business,” Jerry Leeman, a commercial fishing captain, told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “Developers and public officials are laying plans for wind farms that cover 10 million square acres off the coast of Maine alone. Those are highly productive waters that will be permanently closed to our boats.”

Research from Europe suggests offshore wind could have negative, population-scale effects for haddock,” Leeman continued. “That’s the species I pursue. Fishermen can weather a lot, but we can’t handle this.”

“As a third-generation fisherman, I can tell you that if this project continues, we’ll be out of business within the next three years,” James Lovgren, board of trustee member of Clean Ocean Action and retired commercial fisherman, previously told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

A NOAA scientist has also raised concerns about the impact of offshore wind on the endangered North Atlantic right whales species, of which less than 336 remain.

“Additional noise, vessel traffic and habitat modifications due to offshore wind development will likely cause added stress that could result in additional population consequences to a species that is already experiencing rapid decline,” one NOAA scientist wrote in a memo obtained by a Massachusetts news outlet The New Bedford Light in December.

“President Biden’s proposed budget builds on the historic investments from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and the Inflation Reduction Act to bolster our nation’s economy – generating jobs and supporting local and Tribal communities, building resilience to our changing climate, and managing important natural resources,” said Department of the Interior (DOI) Secretary Deb Haaland said in a statement. “At the Department, we will continue to implement our mission through a process that values close collaboration between federal, state, Tribal and local partners, with an eye toward historically marginalized and underrepresented communities that must never again feel left behind.”

Antonino Cambria contributed to this report.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Biden Proposes Increasing ‘Critical Aid’ To Palestinians Despite Growing Concerns Of Funding Terrorism

Kate Anderson on March 9, 2023

President Joe Biden released his proposed budget Thursday for the 2024 fiscal year requesting an additional $40 million in “critical assistance” to the Palestinian people, despite concerns raised by members of Congress regarding how the funding may be used for terrorism.

Biden’s proposed budget for fiscal year 2023 requested $219 million in funding for efforts to improve the situation in the West Bank in Gaza for Palestinians. The President’s new budget is looking to increase the aid by $40 million for the upcoming year to $259 million, while Republicans have argued that recent reports have shown U.S. funding has been exploited by Palestinian terrorist attacks against Israel in the past.

“As part of the Administration’s commitment to advancing security, prosperity, and freedom for both Israelis and Palestinians, the Budget also requests $259 million for critical assistance to the Palestinian people in the West Bank and Gaza, as well as across the region, in support of a two-state solution with Israel,” the budget read.

The budget claims to reaffirm its commitment to Israel by putting aside $3.3 billion for the U.S.-Israel Memorandum of Understanding, a 14-year agreement between the two countries pledging U.S. aid to Israel for self-defense purposes. Despite this, multiple investigations have found that the State Department, USAID and U.S. funding through the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) have provided financial assistance to anti-Israel organizations; several with ties to terrorism.

Republican Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas called out Biden and Democrats for their “special scorn” of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu while also introducing a bill to reinforce the “Taylor Force Act” prohibiting U.S. funding from going to the Palestinian Authority, known for its “Pay to Slay” program that rewards terrorists. Similarly, Republican Rep. Chip Roy also introduced legislation in February to pause funding to UNRWA until accountability measures could be put in place after reports discovered that tunnels for the terrorist group Hamas had been made underneath U.S.-funded Palestinian schools.

The White House did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

You can't access this website

Shore News Network provides free news to users. No paywalls. No subscriptions. Please support us by disabling ad blocker or using a different browser and trying again.