Twitter Suspends Jordan Peterson For ‘Misgendering’ Transgender Actor

Max Keating on June 30, 2022

Twitter suspended well-known clinical psychologist and author Jordan Peterson for “misgendering” actor Elliot Page on Wednesday.

The tweet that got Peterson suspended read “Remember when pride was a sin? And Ellen Page just had her breasts removed by a criminal physician.”

Peterson’s daughter, Mikhaila, announced the suspension on her own Twitter, tagging Elon Musk and adding that the site is “Definitely not a free speech platform at the moment.”

Peterson used Page’s birth name and the “her” pronoun, but the Canadian actor now goes by Elliot and identifies as a man.

Twitter informed Peterson that his comments violated their rule against hateful conduct, which bars users from “promoting violence” against other people for, among other things, “gender identity.”

Peterson rose to international prominence in part because he opposed Canadian Government Bill C-16 on free speech grounds, which he argued would open up the floodgates for prosecuting people who refuse to use a transgender person’s preferred pronouns.

Peterson “quit Twitter” in May after what he called an ‘endless flood of vicious insults’ that he has not received anywhere else, but ostensibly had returned to the site since then.

Twitter did not respond to The Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact The Daily Caller News Foundation

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact  [email protected]. Read the full story at the Daily Caller News Foundation

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

OPEC To Finally Boost Oil Production Ahead Of Biden’s Saudi Arabia Trip

Jack McEvoy on June 30, 2022

The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and its partners agreed to boost oil production on Thursday, backing a plan released earlier this month, ahead of President Joe Biden’s visit to Saudi Arabia in mid-July.

In their fifth meeting since the beginning of the war in Ukraine, which sent oil prices skyrocketing to above $100 a barrel for the first time in eight years, OPEC and a group of Russian-led non-OPEC members agreed to raise their collective production by 648,000 barrels a day.

The move comes after Biden has repeatedly begged the cartel to boost oil production.

The production levels that will increase in August match what OPEC+, a broader coalition of OPEC and Russia-aligned oil producing countries, also committed to producing in July, according to The Wall Street Journal.

As part of the past year’s agreement to lift output to pre-pandemic levels, OPEC+ decided to make a smaller increase last month, raising production by 432,000 barrels per day.

OPEC members also said that they were far behind on their oil production targets and were in their weakest position in recent years to reduce skyrocketing oil prices on Wednesday, reported the WSJ. The cartel’s ability to ramp up its production is diminishing, its delegates said.

Previously, the organization rejected repeated calls from the U.S. and other major oil-consuming countries to produce more oil to help curb surging energy costs as the world continues to face fuel shortages and inflation.

Several OPEC+ member states are failing to meet their share of collective production as global demand for oil soars. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, leading oil producers in the organization, say that they lack the capabilities to bridge the gaps in production caused by their allies.

The White House and Department of Energy did not immediately respond to The Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact The Daily Caller News Foundation

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact  [email protected]. Read the full story at the Daily Caller News Foundation

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

AMERICAN PRIDE ON THE SLIDE: Record-Low 38% ‘Extremely Proud’ to Be American

Max Keating on June 30, 2022

A record-low 38% of U.S. adults say they are “extremely proud” to be American, according to a Gallup poll conducted June 1-20.

The measure has been on a steady decline since 2008, when 58% of Americans surveyed reported being “extremely proud,”Gallup reported.

The larger pool of respondents reporting that they were either  “extremely proud” or “very proud” also shrunk, down to 65% from 85% in 2013.

Gallup suggests record-low overall levels of national pride are the results of the pandemic and skyrocketing inflation. The consumer price index has reached its highest point in 40 years, one gallon of gas costs more than $5 a gallon in parts of the country and one study found that the cost of the average Fourth of July barbecue will be up 17% from last year.

Gallup also speculates that responses being recorded just after mass shootings in Uvalde, Texas, and Buffalo, New York, likely did not help respondents’ outlook.

Survey responses were notably different by party affiliation, Gallup found. The percentage of Republicans that reported extreme pride has dipped to 58%, its lowest point since Gallup began measuring in 2001. The “extremely proud” share of Democrats, on the other hand, is actually up to 26% from 22% in 2019, but down from an all-time high of 56% in 2013.

Gallup’s poll included 1015 respondents and had a margin of error of 4%.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact The Daily Caller News Foundation

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact  [email protected]. Read the full story at the Daily Caller News Foundation

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Liz Warren Demands HHS Register Voters

Carl DeMarco on June 30, 2022

Democrat Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren sent a letter Wednesday to the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Xavier Becerra, demanding that HHS allow Americans to register to vote when they apply for health insurance, The Hill reported.

Warren argued that HHS could best help low-income Americans register to vote because of the department’s routine interactions with Americans who live below the poverty line, according to The Hill. She called for this action on the premise that low-income voters are unfairly disadvantaged when it comes to voting.

“Voter registration is the most significant barrier to voting for low-income Americans and communities of color,” Warren wrote in her letter to HHS. “HHS interacts with these communities annually through HealthCare.gov and can and should offer its users the opportunity to register to vote.”

The letter was sent requesting an update on the department’s handling of Biden’s executive order calling for the head of each agency to develop a plan to “promote voter registration and participation.”

“The American Civil Liberties Union and Dēmos have offered HHS comprehensive guidance on how it may consider executing on its commitment to add voter registration to HealthCare.gov,” Warren wrote in her letter.

The guidance referred to by Warren called for government agencies to integrate voter registration into “all relevant agency transactions,” as well as regular training of staff to provide “effective voter registration services at your agency,” according to a presentation created by both groups.

Included in the presentation were suggested strategies to ensure voters using these services would be able to fill out these applications effectively and accurately. The presentation went on to suggest that members of the departments’ staff should ensure that “the fields in the voter registration application, and how to ensure that the voter registration application is filled out and legible.”

Members of Congress wrote a letter to the Biden administration in March condemning Biden’s executive order, according to Fox News. In the letter, Republican members of Congress aruged the initiative was in conflict with Article 1, Section 4, of the United States Constitution which guarantees the right of individual states to make and enforce electoral laws.

Six other senators signed the letter, including Democratic Hawaii Sen. Mazie K. Hirono and Democratic Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal.

Warren’s office and the HHS did not respond to requests for comment from The Daily Caller News Foundation.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact The Daily Caller News Foundation

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact  [email protected]. Read the full story at the Daily Caller News Foundation

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

SHEFFIELD: Gavin Newsom Just Dumped A Gallon Of Kerosene On The Inflation Fire

Carrie Sheffield on June 30, 2022

They say the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again but expecting different results.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom seems ignorant of this principle. Study after study shows that the some $6 trillion in stimulus spending hurriedly passed during the COVID-19 pandemic contributed significantly to the 40-year, record high inflation we’re suffering today.

What’s the governor of our country’s most populous state doing to fight inflation? Why, send out more inflationary stimulus checks! I wish this were a Babylon Bee or Onion satire article, but it appears Newsom is serious.

Working with Democrats running the legislature, Newsom reportedly said they planned to spend $18.1 billion in this new inflationary scheme that includes $11.5 billion in inflation “relief” funds.

“Millions of Californians will be receiving up to $1,050 as part of a NEW middle class tax rebate,” Newsom tweeted. “That’s more money in your pocket to help you fill your gas tank and put food on the table.”

In reality, this flash-in-the-pan gimmick will make inflation worse. Right now, we have a supply problem. We don’t have a demand problem. Putting more inflationary cash into consumers’ pockets will only drive demand higher.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s attempts to tame inflation toward his 2% goal — from the much higher 8.6% — would only work with improved supply chains. But if supply chains don’t get fixed, higher interest rates will lead to more, painful unemployment, Bloomberg reported.

Newsom and his pals instead should be attacking the supply problem through lowering corporate taxes, removing the onerous and burdensome “clean energy” mandates on his state that are driving energy costs — the biggest inflationary pressure — through the roof. California’s 51 cents a gallon gas tax is scheduled to increase this Friday to 54 cents.

The Wall Street Journal calls Newsom’s payola “street money,” or “cash that politicians dole out in return for political support to get out the vote. California Democrats have decided to take the practice statewide and call it ‘inflation relief.’”

The Journal reports the Golden State has a $100 billion budget thanks to the 2021 COVID bill and strong capital-gains revenue. Under the plan, residents making up to $75,000 would receive $350 apiece and $350 per dependent, with a maximum of $1,050 per family. Individuals making up to $125,000 would get $250.

Newsom wants to give $200 to residents earning up to $250,000 ($500,000 for couples). While certainly a half million bucks goes a lot less far in California, it’s definitely not slumming it. Yet again, we have a case of the left refusing to use the public purse in a way that targets the neediest. And these results, as typical liberal policies do, will backfire.

Newsom is reportedly floating a presidential bid, and stunts like this show how he’s far from deserving of the Oval Office.

Carrie Sheffield is a senior policy analyst at Independent Women’s Voice.

The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller News Foundation.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact The Daily Caller News Foundation

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact  [email protected]. Read the full story at the Daily Caller News Foundation

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Powell Admits That Fighting Inflation Could Lead To Recession

Max Keating on June 30, 2022

The Federal Reserve’s efforts to tamp down on inflation may lead to an economic recession, Fed Chair Jerome Powell admitted Wednesday.

“Is there a risk that we would go too far [with rate hikes]? Certainly there’s a risk,” Powell said to a European Central Bank forum Wednesday. “The bigger mistake to make would be to fail to restore price stability.”

Still, the Fed chairman added that it’s possible to achieve a so-called “soft-landing,” where inflation is brought down to earth without hurting the jobs market or economic growth, but  “the pathways have gotten narrower.”

“The risk is that because of the multiplicity of shocks, you start to transition into a higher-inflation regime. Our job is literally to prevent that from happening, and we will prevent that from happening,” said Powell.

The Federal Reserve has been fighting inflation since March, issuing a massive rate hike of 0.75% in June, but prices have continued to climb. One study found that the average Fourth of July cookout will be 17% more expensive than 2021.

The Fed has signaled that rates could rise even further, from the current aggregate rate of 1.75% to 3.4% by the end of 2022 and to perhaps as much as 4.0% by sometime next year.

Powell noted in May that “nothing about [the economy] suggests that it’s close to, or vulnerable to, a recession,” highlighting how Thursday’s comments stand in stark contrasts to earlier predictions on the direction of the economy.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact The Daily Caller News Foundation

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact  [email protected]. Read the full story at the Daily Caller News Foundation

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Biden’s Attempt To Revive The Iran Deal Has Already Imploded

Micaela Burrow on June 30, 2022

An attempt to revive nuclear talks between the U.S. and Iran in Qatar fell apart Wednesday after two days of negotiations, Reuters reported.

European Union officials blamed the negotiations’ failure on Iran’s insistence that the U.S. drop its designation of the country’s main security force as a foreign terrorist organization, according to Reuters. Iranian officials, however, claimed the U.S. version of the deal “excludes any guarantees for Iran’s economic benefit,” Iranian state-affiliated Tasnim News reported.

We are disappointed that Iran has, yet again, failed to respond positively to the EU’s initiative and therefore that no progress was made,” a state department spokesperson told Reuters. 

Iranian officials refuse to speak directly with the U.S., so an EU envoy relayed communications between U.S. Special Envoy to Iran Rob Malley and his Iranian counterpart.

However, Iranian officials came away with a positive assessment of the progress made, according to Tasnim News. The Qatari diplomat mediating the negotiations also indicated willingness to continue hosting negotiations.

The U.S. had remained silent after Tehran and the EU intimated last week that another attempt at resurrecting the 2015 nuclear agreement could be made “in the coming days,” Reuters reported EU foreign policy minister Josep Borrell as saying on June 25. Progress stalled in the spring of 2022 over UN and U.S. officials’ allegations of Iran’s refusal to cooperate, according to CBS News.

Initial attempts at reentering the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action with Iran after former President Donald Trump’s withdrawal formally started in April 2021, CBS News reported.

Iran ratcheted up uranium enrichment and removed surveillance cameras used by the UN to monitor activity at Iran’s nuclear sites in June, actions the UN’s top nuclear official called a “death blow” to future negotiations.

The State Department did not immediately respond to The Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact The Daily Caller News Foundation

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact  [email protected]. Read the full story at the Daily Caller News Foundation

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

‘I Don’t Have A Choice’: Border Sheriff Personally Escorts Illegal Migrants Back To Mexico

Jennie Taer on June 30, 2022

A Texas border sheriff is taking matters into his own hands and is helping bring migrants back to Mexico, according to multiple reports.

Kinney County Sheriff Brad Coe personally brought four illegal migrants Wednesday to the port of entry in Eagle Pass, Texas, so they could be returned to Mexico, according to The Epoch Times.

“So I can’t let them walk the streets. I can’t say, ‘Hey, go, be free.’ Because I still have to protect the Constitution and protect the people in the county,” Coe said, according to The Epoch Times.

The four illegal migrants were involved in an earlier alleged smuggling attempt Coe’s deputies pursued, according to The Epoch Times. The driver of the vehicle, who ran from authorities, lost control of the vehicle, causing it to flip.

One woman out of the five illegal migrant passengers in the vehicle was transported to a hospital in Del Rio, Texas, while the four others said they didn’t want medical attention, according to The Epoch Times.

Migrants who evaded Border Patrol after crossing the border into San Luis, AZ are apprehended Jennie Taer//Daily Caller News Foundation

Border Patrol told Coe they would only take the passengers into custody if they were medically evaluated, according to The Epoch Times. That’s when he decided to escort them to Mexico.

“But to let them go, undocumented, unaccounted for, just go because of a policy—I couldn’t do it. It’s going to be the exception rather than the rule. But at the same time, if Border Patrol won’t take a group for whatever reason, I don’t have a choice,” he added.

The Mexican national driver was wearing a medallion related to a cartel. He was arrested and faces at least seven felonies, according to The Epoch Times.

Neither the Sheriff’s office nor U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) responded to The Daily Caller News Foundation’s requests for comment.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact The Daily Caller News Foundation

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact  [email protected]. Read the full story at the Daily Caller News Foundation

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

By Stephanie Kelly

NEW YORK -Oil prices sank around 3% on Thursday as OPEC+ confirmed it would only increase output in August as much as previously announced despite tight global supplies, but left the market wondering about future output.

Brent crude futures for September delivery fell $3.42, or 3%, to settle at $109.03 per barrel. The August contract, which expires on Thursday, fell $1.45, or 1.3%, to settle at $114.81 a barrel.

U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude futures fell $4.02, or 3.7%, to settle at $105.76 a barrel.

The OPEC+ group of producers, including Russia, on Thursday agreed to stick to its output strategy after two days of meetings. The producer club avoided discussing policy from September onwards.

Previously, OPEC+ decided to increase output each month by 648,000 barrels per day (bpd) in July and August.

Sanctions on Russian oil since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine have helped send energy prices soaring, stoking inflation and recession fears.

Oil prices fell alongside Wall Street on Thursday. The S&P 500 was set up for its worst first six months since 1970, on concerns that central banks determined to tame inflation will hamper global economic growth. [.N]

Price declines in the oil market were exacerbated as U.S. traders squared positions ahead of the three-day Fourth of July holiday weekend.

“People are taking money off the table,” said Phil Flynn, analyst at Price Futures Group in Chicago.

But further disruptions to supply could limit price declines amid a suspension of Libyan shipments from two eastern ports while Ecuador output fell because of ongoing protests.

In Norway, 74 offshore oil workers at Equinor’s Gudrun, Oseberg South and Oseberg East platforms will go on strike from July 5, the Lederne trade union said on Thursday, likely shutting about 4% of Norway’s oil production.

Meanwhile Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak said on Thursday that a possible import price cap imposed on Russian oil could push prices higher.

(Reporting by Stephanie Kelly in New York; additional reporting by Noah Browning in London, Jeslyn Lerh in Singapore and Arathy Somasekhar in Houston; Editing by Lisa Shumaker, Alistair Bell and Deepa Babington)

tagreuters.com2022binary_LYNXMPEI5T00L-BASEIMAGE

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

By Ron Bousso

LONDON – Shell said on Thursday it had suspended plans to sell its onshore oil assets in Nigeria, complying with a Supreme Court ruling that said it had to wait for the outcome of an appeal over a 2019 oil spill.

“Shell welcomes the Nigerian Supreme Court’s decision to hear the appeal of the Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Ltd (SPDC) in this case,” the London-based company said in a statement.

“Until the outcome of SPDC’s appeal, Shell will not progress the divestment of its interest in SPDC.”

Nigeria’s Supreme Court on June 16 upheld a lower court ruling that stopped Shell from selling its assets in Nigeria until a dispute over a lower court decision to award a Niger Delta community $1.95 billion in compensation over the spill is resolved.

Shell wants to sell its 30% stake in SPDC, which it also operates, as the joint venture struggles with hundreds of spills that are caused mostly by theft.

The company has faced a string of court cases in the past over oil spills.

Shell said that it remains its “strategic intent” to sell its SPDC stake while continuing to invest in offshore oil and gas as well as onshore gas production.

“However, such investment will require a stable and competitive investment climate,” Shell said.

In a separate statement, Osagie Okunbor, Managing Director of SPDC and Shell’s country chair said the joint venture “will continue to comply with the Supreme Court’s order to maintain the status quo.”

Eighty-eight communities in Rivers state were awarded the compensation for an oil spill they blamed on Shell and which damaged their farms and waterways. Shell denies causing the spill.

The community sought and was granted a court order blocking Shell from disposing its assets. The company was also ordered to put the $1.95 billion into an account nominated by the court until the legal dispute was settled.

(This story corrects to say in paragraph 5 that Shell holds a 30%, not 55%, stake in SPDC)

(Reporting by Ron Bousso; Editing by Jan Harvey and David Evans)

tagreuters.com2022binary_LYNXMPEI5T0TG-BASEIMAGE

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

BRUSSELS – EU countries and EU lawmakers on Thursday agreed on rules to curb acquisitions or bids for public contracts by subsidised foreign companies in a bid to ensure a level playing field, the European Parliament said.

The European Commission presented its proposals for the new takeover rules last year in a bid to stave off what it deems unfair competition from countries such as China, underlining a more protectionist approach by the 27-member bloc.

(Reporting by Foo Yun Chee)

tagreuters.com2022binary_LYNXMPEI5T0ZC-BASEIMAGE

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

By Lawrence Hurley

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Supreme Court, in the aftermath of its decision last week to overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade ruling that legalized abortion nationwide, on Thursday threw out lower court rulings that invalidated three abortion laws at the state level.

All three laws – from Arizona, Arkansas and Indiana – were blocked by lower courts based on Roe and the subsequent 1992 ruling that reaffirmed it. That decision, Planned Parenthood v. Casey, was also overturned as part of the court’s June 24 ruling that upheld a law in Mississippi that bans abortion after 15 weeks.

In one case, the court on Thursday threw out a ruling that blocked an Arizona law that bans abortions performed because of fetal genetic abnormalities such as Down syndrome.

The court did the same with a similar law in Arkansas that bans abortions performed due to fetal evidence of Down syndrome and with an appeal brought by Indiana seeking to expand the scope of a state law that requires parents of minors seeking abortions to be notified.

(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Will Dunham)

tagreuters.com2022binary_LYNXMPEI5T0S4-BASEIMAGE

tagreuters.com2022binary_LYNXMPEI5T0R9-BASEIMAGE

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Dem Governor Fundraises For ‘Pregnant People’ In Pro-Abortion Fundraising Campaign, Email Shows

Gabe Kaminsky on June 30, 2022

The Democratic governor of Kansas launched a fundraising campaign in the name of women’s “reproductive rights” yet seemed to imply men can also get pregnant and have abortions, an email obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation shows.

Laura Kelly, a first-term governor, is running for re-election and “is one of the most vulnerable Democrats,” her campaign said in a pro-abortion email to donors on June 24 after the landmark abortion case Roe v. Wade was overturned.

“Will you rush a donation to help me defend the reproductive rights of Kansans and pregnant people everywhere?” said Kelly’s campaign. “Your support is crucial to making sure Kansans know what’s at stake and getting them to the polls in November.”

“I could be the only Kansas leader standing in the way of a new wave of draconian anti-abortion, anti-woman, anti-family laws,” the email also said. “And my opponents will stop at nothing to try to remove me this November.”

The Kansas Republican Party told TheDCNF “it should come as no surprise” that Kelly is using “left-wing activist language like “pregnant people’” after the governor twice vetoed legislation banning transgender athletes from competing in girls’ and women’s sports. Kelly called the measure “divisive” and not “inclusive” enough, while the Republican Governors Association slammed her in a May advertisement for opposing the “commonsense” legislation.

“This language contradicts basic biology, deliberately erases motherhood, and devalues women,” said Shannon Pahls, executive director of the Kansas GOP.

The Republican Governors Association told TheDCNF similarly.

“Democrat Laura Kelly uses terms like ‘pregnant people’ because she prioritizes appeasing her far-left liberal base,” said a spokeswoman for the group, which is focused on getting Republican governors elected nationwide. “It’s out-of-touch with Kansas values and it will cost her re-election.”

A spokeswoman for Kelly declined a request for comment, referring TheDCNF to the governor’s campaign, which did not respond.

Kansas has seen a significant spike in abortions since Kelly took office in 2019. The state saw its largest annual increase since 1995, the Associated Press reported in June 2021.

Republicans have backed an anti-abortion constitutional amendment in Kansas that is on the ballot in August. The amendment, which Kelly has opposed, amends the state’s constitution to affirm that there is no right to abortion.

Other Democratic lawmakers have referred to bodily functions that are applicable to strictly biological women as apparently applicable to men. Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer said in June she “brought a lawsuit on behalf of all menstruating people in Michigan” to protect abortion access.

House Democrats pushed an abortion bill last year that replaced but the word “women” for “patient,” “person” or “individual,” but the gender-neutral terms were removed soon after, The Daily Caller reported. Republicans criticized Missouri Rep. Cori Bush after she claimed in a May 2021 congressional hearing that the U.S. needs “to protect black birthing people.”

“Trans men & non-binary people can also menstruate,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said in September 2021, on the heels of the congresswoman invoking the term “menstruating people” in a CNN interview.

Offices for Ocasio-Cortez and Bush did not respond to a request for comment. A spokeswoman for Whitmer declined to comment.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact The Daily Caller News Foundation

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact  [email protected]. Read the full story at the Daily Caller News Foundation

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

By Andrew Chung

WASHINGTON(Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday refused to revive civil rights lawsuits against jail staff and police in two cases from Texas in which these officials were granted a protection called “qualified immunity” after being accused of misconduct.

One case involved a suit by the family of an inmate who died in 2017 after strangling himself in a cell with a telephone cord while the on-duty guard stood by in a small-town Coleman County jail. The other involved a suit by the family of a man who erupted in flames and died after police in the city of Arlington shot him with a stun gun after he doused himself with gasoline.

Lower courts blocked the lawsuits by granting the police and jail officials qualified immunity. This legal defense protects police and other government officials from civil litigation in certain circumstances, permitting lawsuits only when an individual’s “clearly established” statutory or constitutional rights have been violated.

The lawsuits accused the police and jail officials of violating individual rights protected by the U.S. Constitution.

The justices let stand a lower court ruling that had found that Coleman County jail guard Jessie Laws was protected under qualified immunity from a lawsuit accusing him of violating the constitutional rights of inmate Derrek Monroe, who had been arrested two days before for a suspected drug offense.

The lower court also granted immunity to the guard’s supervisors, Sheriff Leslie Cogdill and Mary Jo Brixey, who oversaw the jail.

Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented in the Supreme Court’s action in Monroe’s case, as she did along with the other two liberal justices, Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan, in the other case involving the death of Gabriel Eduardo Olivas in Arlington. Breyer officially retired from the court on Thursday.

Law enforcement professionals and some U.S. conservatives have argued that qualified immunity is essential for police to make quick decisions in dangerous situations without fear of lawsuits. Critics of the legal principle have said that it has been used to shield from accountability officers who have clearly engaged in misconduct.

Reuters in 2020 published an investigation that revealed how qualified immunity, with the Supreme Court’s continual refinements, has made it easier for police officers to kill or injure civilians with impunity. (To see the Reuters investigation, click https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-police-immunity-scotus)

The suit filed by Monroe’s mother and others accused the jail officials of violating Monroe’s right to due process of law under the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, which protects pre-trial detainees – who have not been found guilty of a crime – from harm or punishment.

The plaintiffs said the jail officials acted with “deliberate indifference” toward Monroe, who was suicidal, by placing him in a cell with a long phone cord, and by failing to render aid or call emergency services when he strangled himself.

The New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the jail staff qualified immunity. The 5th Circuit found that Laws acted unreasonably by neglecting to call emergency medical services, but that prior cases had not clearly established such a requirement or established that his decision to wait for backup to enter Monroe’s cell was unlawful.

The 5th Circuit also granted qualified immunity to Arlington police officers Jeremias Guadarrama and Ebony Jefferson, who used the stun gun on the gasoline-soaked Olivas, causing him to burst into flames. Olivas had also been suicidal and threatened to burn down his family house, according to legal filings.

The suit by Olivas’ family accused police of using excessive force in violation of the Constitution’s Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures, alleging they knew their actions would cause him to be set on fire.

“Using deadly force that does no more than knowingly effectuate the exact danger to be forestalled is clearly unreasonable,” Sotomayor wrote.

(Reporting by Andrew Chung; Editing by Will Dunham)

tagreuters.com2022binary_LYNXMPEI5T0YY-BASEIMAGE

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

By Kanishka Singh

WASHINGTON -A federal grand jury in South Carolina indicted five people on charges of wildlife trafficking and money laundering, including Doc Antle, who starred in the 2020 Netflix series “Tiger King,” the U.S. Justice Department said on Thursday.

The indictment alleges that Antle and others illegally trafficked wildlife in violation of federal law, and made false records regarding that wildlife. The animals involved included lemurs, cheetahs and a chimpanzee, the Justice Department said in a statement.

The indictment names Andrew Sawyer, 52; Meredith Bybee, 51; Charles Sammut, 61; and Jason Clay, 42, along with Antle, 62.

Their representatives could not immediately be reached for comment. Antle’s lawyer told a CBS affiliate that the indictment “was nothing we weren’t expecting.”

The indictment also alleged that in recent months Antle and Sawyer laundered more than $500,000 in cash they believed to be the proceeds of an operation to smuggle immigrants across the Mexican border into the United States illegally.

Antle had allegedly used bulk cash receipts to purchase animals for which he could not use checks, and planned to conceal the cash he received by inflating tourist numbers at a wildlife tropical preserve in Myrtle Beach that he owned, according to the indictment.

Antle starred in “Tiger King,” the true crime series set in the world of private zoos and their eccentric owners, which became a worldwide phenomenon when it was aired in March 2020.

Antle and Sawyer each face a maximum of 20 years in federal prison for the charges related to money laundering, and each of the five people face up to five years for the charges related to wildlife trafficking.

(Reporting by Kanishka Singh in Washington; Editing by Mark Porter and Rosalba O’Brien)

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

The man who sold Malik Faisal Akram the gun he used to kidnap hostages in a Texas synagogue pleaded guilty today to a federal firearm crime, announced United States Attorney for the Northern District of Texas Chad E. Meacham.

Henry “Michael” Dwight Williams, 32, was charged via criminal complaint in January 2022. He pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm before U.S. Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on Thursday.    

“This defendant, a convicted felon, had no business carrying – much less buying and selling – firearms. Whether he suspected his buyer would use the gun to menace a community of faith is legally irrelevant: In the U.S., convicted felons cannot possess firearms,” said U.S. Attorney Chad Meacham. “The Justice Department is committed to prosecuting those who violate our nation’s federal firearm laws, which are designed to keep guns from falling into the hands of dangerous offenders. We are grateful to the FBI, which sprang into action as soon as the synagogue hostage crisis began, and to the agents who worked tirelessly to track the weapon from Mr. Akram to the defendant.”

“Tireless days of nonstop investigation revealed the connection of Mr. Akram to Mr. Williams, we are grateful to the many law enforcement agencies and personnel that traced the weapon’s nefarious source,” said Dallas FBI Special Agent in Charge Matthew DeSarno. “We are fortunate to be able to celebrate the brave actions of the hostages and will continue to support Congregation Beth Israel and the Jewish community in their process of healing.”

According to the complaint, Mr. Williams – a felon previously convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and attempted possession of a controlled substance – sold Mr. Akram a semiautomatic Taurus G2C pistol on Jan. 13. In plea papers, Mr. Williams admitted to possession of that firearm despite his prior conviction.

According to the complaint, on Jan. 15, agents recovered the pistol from Colleyville’s Congregation Beth Israel synagogue, where Mr. Akram had held four individuals hostage for several hours before he was fatally shot by federal law enforcement.

As part of its intensive investigation into the hostage taking, the FBI tied Mr. Williams to Mr. Akram through an analysis of Mr. Akram’s cellphone records, which showed the pair exchanged a series of calls from Jan. 11 through Jan. 13.

When agents first interviewed Mr. Williams on Jan. 16, Mr. Williams stated that he recalled meeting a man with a British accent, but that he could not recall the man’s name. (Mr. Akram was a British citizen.) Agents interviewed the defendant again on Jan. 24, after he was arrested on an outstanding state warrant. After viewing a photo of Mr. Akram, Mr. Williams confirmed he sold Mr. Akram the handgun at an intersection in South Dallas. Analysis of both men’s cellphone records showed that the two phones were in close proximity on Jan. 13. Mr. Williams now faces up to 10 years in federal prison.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Dallas Field Office conducted the investigation with the assistance of the Dallas Police Department, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives’ Dallas Field Division, Homeland Security Investigations’ Dallas Field Division, and the Colleyville Police Department. Assistant U.S. Attorney Joe Magliolo is prosecuting the case with the support of Assistant U.S. Attorneys Errin Martin, Jay Weimer, Alex Lewis, Nicole Dana, P.J. Meitl, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Lindsey Beran (fmr), along with Trial Attorneys David Smith and Michael Dittoe of the Justice Department’s National Security Division.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

By Jonathan Allen

NEW YORK -New York lawmakers began debating how to loosen the state’s gun-licensing laws in an emergency session on Thursday to conform with a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that established a constitutional right for people to carry weapons in public for self-defense.

The state’s Democratic leaders decried last week’s Supreme Court decision in a case challenging New York’s century-old gun license laws. The six justices in the court’s conservative majority ruled it unconstitutional to require law-abiding people to provide “proper cause,” or some kind of special need, for concealed-carry handgun licenses for self-defense.

New York Governor Kathy Hochul joined other Democratic leaders in saying the state would obey the ruling but not without protest: she warned the court had “added fuel to the fire” of gun violence.

“They removed our limitations on who can carry concealed weapons,” she told reporters, describing the court’s vision as allowing guns in crowded venues and bars. “Imagine someone’s talking to your girlfriend. You’re not real happy about it. And you have a gun and you have a temper and that’s what happens.”

She ordered the extraordinary session of the legislature in Albany to remove the “proper cause” requirement from the state’s gun-license laws while also codifying places where guns would be banned.

New York’s efforts to thread the needle of keeping as many gun regulations as possible while obeying the Supreme Court will be closely watched, including by the National Rifle Association and other pro-gun groups.

The new ruling made it easier to challenge and overturn laws governing weapons, and on Thursday the Supreme Court began making its impact clear: the justices threw out recent rulings by lower courts that had upheld bans on assault-style rifles in Maryland and large-capacity ammunition magazines in New Jersey and California.

‘SENSITIVE PLACES’

In its ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association (NYSRPA) v. Bruen, the Supreme Court said it would likely accept courthouses, schools and government buildings as “sensitive places” where the public can be barred from carrying weapons, but would frown on applying the label broadly. The ruling explicitly warned trying to deem the entire island of Manhattan a sensitive place would be unconstitutional.

Hochul said she expected New York’s list also to include hospitals, day-care centers, parks, zoos, playgrounds and public transit. The NYSRPA has said it would challenge a guns ban on New York City’s subway system, which currently lets concealed-carry permit holders bring their guns.

Private businesses will be presumed to be gun-free unless owners post a sign out front saying: “Concealed-carry weapons welcome here,” Hochul said.

The Supreme Court also said similar gun-license regimes in California, New Jersey, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Maryland and Washington D.C. are also unconstitutional.

The revised licensing regimes must more closely resemble the gun laws of the 43 states where officials have less discretion to deny people gun licenses, although the court ruled that people with certain kinds of criminal history or mental illness could still be denied the right to carry weapons.

Hochul has said there will be expanded firing-range training requirements before New Yorkers can qualify for a gun permit, and that the state will revive an old law requiring background checks for purchasing certain kinds of ammunition.

But any gun regulation challenged in federal court must now survive a test defined by the Supreme Court last week, which makes a weapons regulation constitutional only if it is similar to limits on arms found in American history, particularly the 18th century, when the Constitution’s Second Amendment was ratified.

New York’s current gun license rules were codified in 1913.

(Reporting by Jonathan Allen; Editing by Donna Bryson, Josie Kao and Daniel Wallis)

tagreuters.com2022binary_LYNXMPEI5T02G-BASEIMAGE

tagreuters.com2022binary_LYNXMPEI5T02H-BASEIMAGE

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

            WASHINGTON – Joseph Tamjong, 50, of Lanham, Maryland, was arrested today after being charged in federal court with defrauding the D.C. Medicaid program out of hundreds of thousands of dollars. 

            The announcement was made by U.S. Attorney Matthew M. Graves, Wayne A. Jacobs, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI Washington Field Office’s Criminal Division, Maureen R. Dixon, Special Agent in Charge of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General for the region that includes Washington, D.C., and Daniel W. Lucas, Inspector General for the District of Columbia.

            Tamjong was charged in a criminal complaint with health care fraud and health care false statements. He is to make his initial appearance later today in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

            According to charging documents, between approximately December 2014 and the present, Tamjong has been employed as personal care aide and/or a participant-directed worker to provide personal care aide services to District of Columbia residents who need assistance performing activities of daily living, such as getting in and out of bed, bathing, dressing, and eating. Tamjong is alleged to have submitted false timesheets claiming that he provided such services when in fact he did not, including when he was traveling outside the United States on eight different trips. Charging documents allege that between December 2014 and February 2022, Medicaid issued payments totaling approximately $733,405 for personal care aide services that Tamjong purportedly provided as a personal care aide or participant-directed worker.

            A complaint is merely an allegation, and all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

            Today’s arrest marks a continued effort by the FBI, the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General, the District of Columbia’s Office of the Inspector General’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office to investigate and prosecute individuals who defraud the D.C. Medicaid program.  Since August 2018, 11 former personal care aides have pleaded guilty to defrauding Medicaid in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Six of those aides were sentenced to 13 months in prison; a seventh was sentenced to serve 15 months. An eleventh, Susan Tingwei—a licensed attorney—is scheduled to be sentenced on July 11, 2022.

            The government urges the public to provide tips and assistance to stop health care fraud. If you have information about individuals committing health care fraud, please call the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General hotline at (800) HHS‑TIPS [(800) 447-8477] or the D.C. Office of the Inspector General at (800) 724-TIPS [(800) 274-8477].

            This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Kondi Kleinman, with assistance from Paralegal Specialist Michon Tart.

 

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

            WASHINGTON – A South Carolina man pleaded guilty today to two felony charges for his actions during the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. His and others’ actions disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes related to the presidential election.

            George Amos Tenney III, 35, of Anderson, South Carolina, pleaded guilty in the District of Columbia to civil disorder and obstruction of an official proceeding. According to court documents, in December 2020, Tenney made plans to travel to Washington on Jan. 6, 2021. He sent a Facebook message on Dec. 28, 2020, that stated, among other things, “It’s starting to look like we may siege the capital building and congress if the electoral votes don’t go right.”

            On Jan. 6, Tenney illegally entered the Capitol Building. He moved to the area inside the Rotunda Doors, arriving there at approximately 2:24 p.m. Rioters had amassed outside the doors and were struggling against the police officers attempting to secure the building. Tenney tried to open the Rotunda Doors to allow the rioters inside, and he had contact with multiple federal employees while doing so. He succeeded in opening one of the doors.  A police officer who was outside tried to push them closed, and Tenney resisted, pushing against the door to try to keep it open. An employee of the House Sergeant at Arms then ran towards Tenney, pushing him aside in an effort to close the door. Tenney grabbed the employee by the shoulder. He and other rioters surrounded the employee, and a heated conversation began. A rioter from outside the doors forced his way inside and pushed the employee of the House Sergeant at Arms away.

            Tenney, meanwhile, continued to stand in the doorway, and locked arms with a Capitol Police officer who was just outside the doors. He and the officer moved inside, towards the Rotunda. Tenney pushed away the officer’s hand. While in the Rotunda, he yelled, “Stand up, Patriots, stand up!” He then returned to the Rotunda Doors, where he assisted rioters entering the building, patting them on the back and helping them move forward. When another Capitol Police officer entered the area, Tenney pushed him to the side. Tenney ultimately had to be pulled back inside so that the Rotunda Doors could be closed to keep other rioters from entering. He then retreated to the Rotunda and exited the Capitol through a window at approximately 2:32 p.m.

            Tenney was arrested on June 29, 2021, in Anderson, South Carolina. He is to be sentenced on Oct. 20, 2022. He faces a statutory maximum of five years in prison in prison on the civil disorder charge and up to 20 years in prison on the obstruction charge. The charges also carry potential financial penalties. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

            The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Justice Department’s National Security Division are prosecuting the case, with valuable assistance provided by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of South Carolina.

            The FBI’s Columbia, South Carolina Field Office investigated the case, with valuable assistance from the FBI’s Washington Field Office, the U.S. Capitol Police and the Metropolitan Police Department

            In the 17 months since Jan. 6, 2021, more than 840 individuals have been arrested in nearly all 50 states for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol, including over 250 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement. The investigation remains ongoing.  

            Anyone with tips can call 1-800-CALL-FBI (800-225-5324) or visit tips.fbi.gov.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Kristen Clarke, Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, Damian Williams, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and Breon Peace, the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, announced today a civil pattern or practice investigation into the Special Victims Division (SVD) of the New York City Police Department (NYPD). The investigation will assess whether the SVD engages in a pattern or practice of gender-biased policing. The investigation will include a comprehensive review of the policies, procedures, and training for SVD investigations of sexual assault crimes, including how SVD interacts with survivors and witnesses, collects evidence, and completes investigations; any steps NYPD has taken to address deficiencies in its handling of sexual assault crimes; how SVD allocates staffing and other resources; and the services and support offered to survivors of sexual assault. As part of this investigation, the Justice Department officials will reach out to community groups and members of the public to learn about their experiences with SVD.   

Prior to the announcement, Justice Department (Department) officials notified Mayor Eric Adams, NYPD Commissioner Keechant L. Sewell, and NYC Corporation Counsel Sylvia O. Hinds-Radix, who have pledged to cooperate with the investigation.

Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke said: “Survivors of sexual assault should expect effective, trauma-informed and victim-centered investigations by police departments. Based on information provided to the Justice Department, we find significant justification to investigate whether the NYPD’s Special Victims Division engages in a pattern or practice of gender-biased policing. Investigations into sexual assault that comply with the Constitution promote accountability, enhance public safety and foster community trust.”

EDNY U.S. Attorney Breon Peace said: “Respectful, thorough, and complete investigations of sexual assaults are fundamental to a well-functioning justice system.  Over the last several months, we have learned concerning information from a variety of sources of historical issues about the way the Special Victims Division has conducted its investigations for many years.  Our review is intended to ensure that, going forward, survivors of sexual assault in New York City receive fair and just treatment in the criminal justice system, and as a result, those who engage in sexual violence are held accountable.  We appreciate that the NYPD has already taken steps to address these concerns.”

SDNY U.S. Attorney Damian Williams said: “Victims of sex crimes deserve the same rigorous and unbiased investigations of their cases that the NYPD affords to other categories of crime.  Likewise, relentless and effective pursuit of perpetrators of sexual violence, unburdened by gender stereotypes or differential treatment, is essential to public safety. We look forward to working with our partners in EDNY and the Civil Rights Division to assess the NYPD’s practices in this area.”

The Department received information alleging deficiencies at SVD that have persisted for more than a decade, depriving survivors and the public of the prompt, thorough, and effective investigations needed to protect public safety. These deficiencies allegedly include failing to conduct basic investigative steps and instead shaming and abusing survivors and re-traumatizing them during investigations. 

The investigation is being conducted pursuant to the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, which prohibits state and local governments from engaging in a pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement officers that deprives individuals of rights protected by the Constitution or federal law. The Act allows the Justice Department to remedy such misconduct through civil litigation. The Department will be assessing law enforcement practices under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, as well as the Safe Streets Act of 1968.

The Civil Rights Unit in the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, the Civil Rights Team in the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York, and the Special Litigation Section of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division will jointly conduct this investigation. Individuals with relevant information are encouraged to contact the Department via email at [email protected] or by calling 212-637-2746. Individuals can also report civil rights violations regarding this or other matters using the Civil Rights Division’s new reporting portal, available at www.civilrights.justice.gov, to the Eastern District of New York at https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/civil-rights, or to the Southern District of New York at https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/civil-rights

Information specific to the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division’s Police Reform Work can be found here: https://www.justice.gov/crt/file/922421/download.  The Department’s updated guidance on improving law enforcement response to sexual assault and domestic violence can be found here:  Improving Law Enforcement Response to Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence by Identifying and Preventing Gender Bias (justice.gov).

Additional information about the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York is available on its website at https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny. Additional information about the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York is available on its website at https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny. Additional information about the Civil Rights Division is available on its website at www.justice.gov/crt.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. – Alexander M.M. Uballez, United States Attorney for the District of New Mexico, announced that Cisco Casaus-Alires pleaded guilty on June 29 to robbery of mail, money and other property of the United States and brandishing a firearm during and in furtherance of a crime of violence. Casaus-Alires, 21, of Albuquerque, will remain in custody pending sentencing, which has not been scheduled.

According to the plea agreement and other court records, on Nov. 7, 2020, Casaus-Alires robbed a United States Postal Service (USPS) letter carrier at gunpoint in southeast Albuquerque, demanding the letter carrier’s cell phone, USPS keys and mail. On Dec. 26, 2020, in southwest Albuquerque, Casaus-Alires robbed another letter carrier at gunpoint. Casaus-Alires demanded the letter carrier’s wallet, phone and USPS keys, and then demanded that the letter carrier load parcels into Casaus-Alires’ vehicle.

On Dec. 28, 2020, in south Albuquerque, Casaus-Alires robbed a third letter carrier at gunpoint, demanding the letter carrier’s wallet, phone and USPS keys. As Casaus-Alires took mail and parcels from the USPS vehicle, he asked the letter carrier where “the good stuff” is delivered, then fled the area.

By the terms of the plea agreement, Casaus-Alires faces 16 to 20 years in prison.

The United States Postal Inspection Service investigated this case with assistance from the United States Marshals Service. Assistant U.S. Attorney Jaymie L. Roybal is prosecuting the case.

# # #

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Jacksonville, Florida – United States Attorney Roger B. Handberg announces that Orlando Pina (31, Atlantic Beach), Tawfiq Goggans (25, Jacksonville), Juan Carlos Muniz-Alvarez (33, Jacksonville), and Juan Carlos Muniz-Alvarez (33, Jacksonville) have been sentenced to federal prison terms for their involvement in a conspiracy to distribute more than 50 grams of pure/actual methamphetamine in the Jacksonville area.

According to court documents, between December 2018 and September 2020, Pina supplied Goggans with two to six pounds of methamphetamine every week or two in Jacksonville. When arrested, Pina, having been previously been convicted of a felony offense, unlawfully possessed a firearm which was seized by law enforcement officers. In March 2022, Pina pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute 50 grams or more of pure/actual methamphetamine. On June 23, 2022, Pina was sentenced to 13 years and 8 months in federal prison. He was held accountable for distributing at least 1.5 kilograms and up to 4.5 kilograms of pure/actual methamphetamine.

On March 9, 2022, Goggans pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute 50 grams or more of pure/actual methamphetamine. He was sentenced on June 7, 2022, to 5 years in federal prison. Goggans was held accountable for distributing at least 1.5 kilograms and up to 4.5 kilograms of pure/actual methamphetamine.

On February 25, 2022, Muniz-Alvarez pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute 50 grams or more of pure/actual methamphetamine. He was sentenced on June 1, 2022, to 10 years in federal prison. Muniz-Alvarez was held accountable for distributing at least 1.5 kilograms and up to 4.5 kilograms of pure/actual methamphetamine.

On April 1, 2021, Windle pleaded guilty to possession with the intent to distribute 50 grams or more of pure/actual methamphetamine. He was sentenced to 7 years in federal prison on July 12, 2021.

“The illicit opioid crisis continues to ravage our communities, prematurely end lives, and tragically destroy families at the seams,” said HSI Tampa Special Agent in Charge John Condon. “The sentencings of these criminals to a combined 428 months in a federal penitentiary is a testament to the partnerships we have with the Clay County Sheriff’s Office and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service to stop the peddling of poison.”

This case was investigated by Homeland Security Investigations, the United States Postal Inspection Service, the Clay County Sheriff’s Office, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection. It was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Julie Hackenberry.

 

 

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Tampa, FL – United States Attorney Roger B. Handberg announces the return of an indictment charging Marquvius Trevon Dixon (26, Clearwater) with possessing a firearm as a convicted felon. If convicted, Dixon faces a minimum mandatory term of 15 years, and up to life, in federal prison. The indictment also notifies Dixon that the United States intends to forfeit the firearm traceable to his offense.

According to the indictment, on July 8, 2021, Dixon possessed a firearm. At the time of the incident, Dixon had multiple prior felony convictions for the sale of cocaine and possession of cocaine. As a previously convicted felon, Dixon is prohibited from possessing a firearm under federal law.

An indictment is merely a formal charge that a defendant has committed one or more violations of federal criminal law, and every defendant is presumed innocent unless, and until, proven guilty.

This case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Clearwater Police Department. It will be prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney David P. Sullivan. The forfeiture will be handled by Assistant United States Attorney Suzanne Nebesky.

This case is being prosecuted as part of the joint federal, state, and local Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN) Program, the centerpiece of the Department of Justice’s violent crime reduction efforts.  PSN is an evidence-based program proven to be effective at reducing violent crime.  Through PSN, a broad spectrum of stakeholders work together to identify the most pressing violent crime problems in the community and develop comprehensive solutions to address them.  As part of this strategy, PSN focuses enforcement efforts on the most violent offenders and partners with locally based prevention and reentry programs for lasting reductions in crime.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Kristen Clarke, Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, Damian Williams, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and Breon Peace, the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, announced today a civil pattern or practice investigation into the Special Victims Division (SVD) of the New York City Police Department (NYPD). The investigation will assess whether the SVD engages in a pattern or practice of gender-biased policing. The investigation will include a comprehensive review of the policies, procedures, and training for SVD investigations of sexual assault crimes, including how SVD interacts with survivors and witnesses, collects evidence, and completes investigations; any steps NYPD has taken to address deficiencies in its handling of sexual assault crimes; how SVD allocates staffing and other resources; and the services and support offered to survivors of sexual assault. As part of this investigation, the Justice Department officials will reach out to community groups and members of the public to learn about their experiences with SVD.   

Prior to the announcement, Justice Department (Department) officials notified Mayor Eric Adams, NYPD Commissioner Keechant L. Sewell, and NYC Corporation Counsel Sylvia O. Hinds-Radix, who have pledged to cooperate with the investigation.

Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke said:  “Survivors of sexual assault should expect effective, trauma-informed and victim-centered investigations by police departments.  Based on information provided to the Justice Department, we find significant justification to investigate whether the NYPD’s Special Victims Division engages in a pattern or practice of gender-biased policing. Investigations into sexual assault that comply with the Constitution promote accountability, enhance public safety and foster community trust.” 

SDNY U.S. Attorney Damian Williams said:  “Victims of sex crimes deserve the same rigorous and unbiased investigations of their cases that the NYPD affords to other categories of crime.  Likewise, relentless and effective pursuit of perpetrators of sexual violence, unburdened by gender stereotypes or differential treatment, is essential to public safety. We look forward to working with our partners in EDNY and the Civil Rights Division to assess the NYPD’s practices in this area.”

EDNY U.S. Attorney Breon Peace said:  “Respectful, thorough, and complete investigations of sexual assaults are fundamental to a well-functioning justice system.  Over the last several months, we have learned concerning information from a variety of sources of historical issues about the way the Special Victims Division has conducted its investigations for many years.  Our review is intended to ensure that, going forward, survivors of sexual assault in New York City receive fair and just treatment in the criminal justice system, and as a result, those who engage in sexual violence are held accountable.  We appreciate that the NYPD has already taken steps to address these concerns.”

The Department received information alleging deficiencies at SVD that have persisted for more than a decade, depriving survivors and the public of the prompt, thorough, and effective investigations needed to protect public safety. These deficiencies allegedly include failing to conduct basic investigative steps and instead shaming and abusing survivors and re-traumatizing them during investigations. 

The investigation is being conducted pursuant to the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, which prohibits state and local governments from engaging in a pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement officers that deprives individuals of rights protected by the Constitution or federal law. The Act allows the Justice Department to remedy such misconduct through civil litigation. The Department will be assessing law enforcement practices under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, as well as the Safe Streets Act of 1968.

The Civil Rights Unit in the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, and the Civil Rights Team in the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York, and the Special Litigation Section of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division will jointly conduct this investigation. Individuals with relevant information are encouraged to contact the Department via email at [email protected] or by calling 212-637-2746. Individuals can also report civil rights violations regarding this or other matters using the Civil Rights Division’s new reporting portal, available at www.civilrights.justice.gov, to the Eastern District of New York at https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/civil-rights, or to the Southern District of New York at https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/civil-rights.  

Information specific to the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division’s Police Reform Work can be found here: https://www.justice.gov/crt/file/922421/download.  The Department’s updated guidance on improving law enforcement response to sexual assault and domestic violence can be found here:  Improving Law Enforcement Response to Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence by Identifying and Preventing Gender Bias (justice.gov).

Additional information about the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York is available on its website at https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny. Additional information about the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York is available on its website at https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny. Additional information about the Civil Rights Division is available on its website at www.justice.gov/crt.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

You can't access this website

Shore News Network provides free news to users. No paywalls. No subscriptions. Please support us by disabling ad blocker or using a different browser and trying again.