Virginia's new gun bill requires the confiscation of firearms and imposes criminal penalties on transfers

Virginia’s New Gun Bill Requires the Confiscation of Firearms and Imposes Criminal Penalties on Transfers

Posted by
3 mins read
February 5, 2026

Virginia gun rights uproar: Delegate warns new bill would criminalize gun sales and ownership over time

Richmond, VA – A fiery debate inside the Virginia House of Delegates this week set off a political explosion across the Commonwealth after Delegate Wren Williams (R–Patrick) accused Democratic lawmakers of quietly crafting what he called “confiscation on a timeline.”

https:// /WrenWilliamsVA/status/2019266113121452321

The dispute unfolded as the chamber debated a proposed assault weapons ban sponsored by Delegate Dan Helmer (D–Fairfax), which would prohibit the sale and transfer of certain semiautomatic rifles, pistols, and shotguns after July 1. The measure claims to “grandfather” in existing firearms legally owned before that date, allowing Virginians to keep what they already possess.

But when Williams pressed Helmer on how Virginians could legally sell or transfer those grandfathered firearms, the exchange quickly grew tense. “How do Virginians sell their grandfathered firearms under your bill?” Williams asked on the floor.

Helmer declined to answer directly, replying only, “Read the bill.”

Williams did—and what he found, he said, shows every method of transfer is a crime.

“The bill says you can sell it to a firearms dealer or to an out-of-state individual,” Williams told the chamber. “But that’s a federal felony. Under 18 U.S.C. §922(a)(5), it’s a crime punishable by up to five years in federal prison for any private citizen to transfer a firearm to someone who lives in another state without going through a licensed dealer. Then this bill makes it a state crime to sell to a firearms dealer. There’s no exception for a dealer to buy it from you. The only exceptions are between dealers or to law enforcement. So the government can keep their guns, but you can’t.”

The legislation mirrors prior bills introduced in 2024, including HB2 and SB2, which aimed to ban future sales of semiautomatic firearms labeled as “assault weapons.” The new version again restricts import, sale, transfer, manufacture, or purchase of these firearms after July 1. Virginians who already own them could keep them—but not sell, trade, or even store them with another person.

Williams said the law goes further than any prior proposal by making participation in even government-approved “buyback” programs illegal. “This bill allows a locality to run a buyback,” he said, “but it makes someone who participates commit a misdemeanor. And the group that takes the gun commits a misdemeanor, too. That’s absurd. That’s not a buyback—that’s a setup.”

Under Virginia law, violating the proposed ban could carry severe penalties. An illegal sale or transfer would be a Class 1 misdemeanor, punishable by up to 12 months in jail and a $2,500 fine under Va. Code §18.2-11. Unlawful possession of a newly banned assault firearm after the deadline could be charged as a Class 6 felony, carrying up to five years in prison.

Federal law adds another layer of risk. Selling or transferring a firearm across state lines without a licensed intermediary violates 18 U.S.C. §922(a)(5), a felony that carries up to five years imprisonment and a $250,000 fine.

Even participation in a buyback program, Williams said, could expose both citizens and localities to prosecution under Va. Code §18.2-308.2:2, which governs illegal firearm transfers.

“What’s left?” Williams asked during his floor speech. “You can surrender it for nothing to the government, just like Australia. You can give it to an immediate family member, or you can die—and then your heirs can inherit it. That’s the only way you can transfer a grandfathered rifle in the Commonwealth without becoming a criminal.”

The bill’s supporters argue it is aimed at preventing mass shootings and reducing gun trafficking by restricting the circulation of military-style firearms. But critics like Williams say the language is a deliberate attempt to erode gun ownership gradually by making lawful transfers impossible.

“The bill isn’t about safety,” Williams said. “It’s about slow-motion confiscation. They’re telling Virginians you can keep your firearm, but only until you try to sell it, move it, or die. That’s confiscation on a timeline.”

His remarks went viral online after he summarized the issue in a post to X, writing, “I asked: ‘How do Virginians sell their grandfathered firearms under your bill?’ He said: ‘Read the bill.’ I did. Every option is a crime. That’s not a grandfather clause. That’s confiscation on a timeline.”

• Delegate Wren Williams argued the new Virginia gun bill effectively bans all firearm transfers.
• The bill’s sponsor, Delegate Dan Helmer, declined to explain how lawful owners could sell their guns.
• Violations could result in up to five years in prison under state or federal law.

The measure, which passed out of committee earlier this week, now heads to the state Senate, where Republicans and several moderate Democrats are expected to challenge it. Gun rights advocates say they plan to fight the bill all the way to court if it becomes law.

Phil Stilton is the Editor and Publisher of Shore News Network, an independent digital newsroom providing original reporting on New Jersey, national news, government, public policy, public safety, courts, and community affairs.

As founder of the publication, Stilton leads editorial strategy, investigative reporting, and daily newsroom operations while overseeing coverage that reaches millions of readers annually.

With extensive experience covering municipal government, county government, state legislatures, elections, law enforcement, emergency management, and public records, Stilton specializes in translating complex government actions into clear, factual reporting. His work frequently relies on primary source documents, including court filings, legislation, public meeting records, election finance disclosures, government databases, police reports, and Freedom of Information and Open Public Records Act (OPRA) requests. He has reported extensively on local government accountability, taxpayer spending, campaign finance, public corruption investigations, infrastructure, public safety, and the policies affecting New Jersey residents.

Under Stilton's editorial leadership, Shore News Network has grown into one of New Jersey's largest independent digital news organizations, publishing thousands of original news articles each year while providing breaking news coverage, investigative reporting, and analysis across state and local government. The publication's reporting is routinely sourced from official government agencies, public officials, court records, and firsthand documentation, with a commitment to transparency, attribution, corrections when warranted, and clearly distinguishing factual reporting from opinion.

Stilton's journalism follows established newsroom standards emphasizing accuracy, verification, fairness, and accountability. Every effort is made to verify information through official records and multiple reliable sources before publication. His reporting is intended to provide readers with timely, well-documented information that helps them understand the issues affecting their communities, while maintaining editorial independence from political parties, government agencies, advocacy organizations, and commercial interests.

Readers can submit story tips, corrections, public records, or media inquiries through the official Shore News Network website or its verified social media channels. Shore News Network welcomes corrections and updates when new information becomes available as part of its ongoing commitment to accurate and transparent journalism.

Don't Miss

Exit mobile version