Trenton, NJ – Governor Mikie Sherrill has ignited a fierce battle over education after announcing her plan to force school districts across New Jersey to consolidate by county last night, a move that is clearly is designed to strengthen the grip of the powerful state teachers’ union.
Through consolidation, the NJEA will also consolidate its powerbase statewide, eliminating local school boards filled with parents, advocates, and local residents, replacing them with professional politicians backed by special interests in expensive county-level elections.
By forcing consolidation, Sherrill, as governor, could then implement her radical educational plans such as an LGBTQ course, gender studies, boys in girls sports and locker rooms, DEI, aggressive and progressive sexual education, and other progressive aligned agendas.
This is accomplished by eliminating the “middle man” or, concerned local parents on school boards.
The sweeping proposal would eliminate hundreds of local districts and merge them into countywide systems, wiping out long-standing traditions of home rule that have allowed towns to manage their own schools. Sherrill said the plan would reduce administrative costs and streamline services, but opponents argue the real purpose is to concentrate bargaining power and give the NJEA greater control over curriculum, contracts and school board decisions.
New Jersey currently has more than 600 school districts, each with its own elected board. Under Sherrill’s plan, those would collapse into just 21 countywide districts. The NJEA has long supported consolidation, citing efficiency, but critics warn the move would silence dissenting school board members who have opposed union-backed policies on curriculum, sex education and athletics.
Ad: Save every day with Amazon Deals: Check out today's daily deals on Amazon.
The NJEA is currently fighting 600 school boards, many of which oppose their radical education reform in New Jersey.
By eliminating those local boards, the NJEA will wield greater influence, and even control of the county districts, which would require massive campaign financing and political organizing to win.
The NJEA has that. Moms and dads fighting for their children do not.
Sen. Vin Gopal, chairman of the Senate Education Committee, quickly backed the governor’s proposal, calling consolidation “compulsory and necessary.” Gopal argued the state has “too much government” and that forcing towns to merge services would lower costs for residents. His comments triggered immediate backlash from parents and local officials who accused him of ignoring struggling suburban districts while protecting funding for urban strongholds.
GOP gubernatorial candidate Jack Ciattarelli rejected the plan outright, saying New Jersey’s identity is built on home rule. He argued that while voluntary consolidations could make sense in certain cases, forcing districts to merge under a statewide mandate undermines community control and accountability.
Ciattarelli noted that under decades of Democratic leadership, New Jersey has slipped from the nation’s second-ranked education system to 12th, raising doubts that further centralization will solve the problem.
The fear is that the plan would deepen inequities while reducing transparency for parents, and turn education into a highly politicized battle between wealthy special interests.