Platkin files amicus brief backing law firms targeted by trump executive orders

TRENTON, N.J. — New Jersey Attorney General Matthew J. Platkin is co-leading a 21-state coalition of attorneys general in filing amicus briefs supporting two law firms challenging executive orders issued under President Donald Trump, which allegedly impose sanctions in retaliation for representing disfavored clients and causes.

Key Points

Amicus briefs support lawsuits by Jenner & Block and WilmerHale against Trump-era executive orders
Orders allegedly revoke clearances, restrict access to federal buildings, and pressure contractors to cut ties
AG Platkin calls the actions unconstitutional and damaging to the rule of law

Coalition pushes back against ‘unconstitutional’ sanctions

The briefs, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, support Jenner & Block LLP and Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP (WilmerHale) in their suits against the U.S. Department of Justice and the Executive Office of the President, respectively.

The lawsuits challenge executive orders that allegedly target the firms’ personnel by suspending security clearances, banning access to federal buildings, and pressuring federal contractors to terminate business relationships.

“Targeting law firms and attorneys for doing their jobs and representing their clients is outrageous, unprecedented, and unconstitutional,” Platkin said in a statement. “It is also deeply damaging to our democracy.”

According to the complaints, the Trump administration issued the orders in retaliation for the law firms’ involvement in cases or representation deemed adversarial to its interests.

The coalition argues the executive orders undermine constitutional protections and the independence of the legal profession. The attorneys general say the measures pose a direct threat to the right to counsel and the ability of attorneys to represent controversial or unpopular clients without fear of reprisal.

Attorney General Platkin added, “President Trump’s unlawful executive orders seek to intimidate lawyers into never crossing him in court or otherwise. But the President and his team will not intimidate us.”

Both law firms previously secured temporary injunctions and are now seeking permanent relief to block the orders from being enforced. The plaintiffs claim the orders are punitive, designed to chill legal advocacy, and violate First and Fifth Amendment rights.

Broader impact on access to justice

The coalition’s brief also highlights potential long-term harm to public access to legal services, especially for vulnerable populations relying on pro bono representation. The attorneys general argue that discouraging firms from accepting high-profile or politically sensitive cases may leave many without adequate legal recourse.

“A fair and functioning judicial system depends on lawyers being willing to work on controversial cases or represent unpopular clients without fearing retribution by the government,” the brief states.

Led by Platkin, Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul, Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell, and Washington Attorney General Nick Brown, the coalition includes attorneys general from 17 other states, including California, Maryland, and Minnesota.

Phil Stilton Latest posts

Phil Stilton is the Editor and Publisher of Shore News Network, an independent digital newsroom providing original reporting on New Jersey, national news, government, public policy, public safety, courts, and community affairs.

As founder of the publication, Stilton leads editorial strategy, investigative reporting, and daily newsroom operations while overseeing coverage that reaches millions of readers annually.

With extensive experience covering municipal government, county government, state legislatures, elections, law enforcement, emergency management, and public records, Stilton specializes in translating complex government actions into clear, factual reporting. His work frequently relies on primary source documents, including court filings, legislation, public meeting records, election finance disclosures, government databases, police reports, and Freedom of Information and Open Public Records Act (OPRA) requests. He has reported extensively on local government accountability, taxpayer spending, campaign finance, public corruption investigations, infrastructure, public safety, and the policies affecting New Jersey residents.

Under Stilton's editorial leadership, Shore News Network has grown into one of New Jersey's largest independent digital news organizations, publishing thousands of original news articles each year while providing breaking news coverage, investigative reporting, and analysis across state and local government. The publication's reporting is routinely sourced from official government agencies, public officials, court records, and firsthand documentation, with a commitment to transparency, attribution, corrections when warranted, and clearly distinguishing factual reporting from opinion.

Stilton's journalism follows established newsroom standards emphasizing accuracy, verification, fairness, and accountability. Every effort is made to verify information through official records and multiple reliable sources before publication. His reporting is intended to provide readers with timely, well-documented information that helps them understand the issues affecting their communities, while maintaining editorial independence from political parties, government agencies, advocacy organizations, and commercial interests.

Readers can submit story tips, corrections, public records, or media inquiries through the official Shore News Network website or its verified social media channels. Shore News Network welcomes corrections and updates when new information becomes available as part of its ongoing commitment to accurate and transparent journalism.