Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact[email protected].
Read the full story at the Daily Caller News Foundation
Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett worried Sunday that the court is increasingly being portrayed to the public as a partisan institution, emphasizing that justices must be “hyper vigilant” that they do not let personal biases affect their work.
“My goal today is to convince you that this court is not comprised of a bunch of partisan hacks,” she told guests at the University of Louisville Sunday,the Courier Journal reported. “Judicial philosophies are not the same as political parties,” she said, citing several cases where the Supreme Court did not rule along party lines.
“The media, along with hot takes on Twitter, report the results and decisions,” Barrett continued, adding that this “makes the decision seem results-oriented” and “leaves the reader to judge whether the court was right or wrong, based on whether she liked the results of the decision.”
- Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett worried Sunday that the Supreme Court is increasingly being portrayed to the public as a partisan institution, emphasizing that justices must be “hyper vigilant” that they do not let personal biases effect their work.
- “The media, along with hot takes on Twitter, report the results and decisions,” Barrett said, adding that this “makes the decision seem results-oriented” and “leaves the reader to judge whether the court was right or wrong, based on whether she liked the results of the decision.”
- Barrett’s comments come at a contentious political moment in which she herself is facing intense scrutiny over abortion rulings.
“And here’s the thing: Sometimes, I don’t like the results of my decisions,” the Supreme Court justice continued, according to the Courier Journal. “But it’s not my job to decide cases based on the outcome I want.”
The justice also emphasized that members of the highest court in the land should be “hyper vigilant to make sure they’re not letting personal biases creep into their decisions, since judges are people, too,”Politico reported.
Barrett’s comments come at a contentious political moment in which she herself faces intense scrutiny over abortion rulings: media and Democrats havepredictedthat appointing Barrett to the court would result in radical right-wing, Handmaid’s Tale like rulings.
Earlier this month,the Supreme Court deniedabortion providers’ requests to block Texas’ new lawbanningabortions after a baby’s heartbeat can be detected (about six weeks), and the court will soon consider a Mississippi law banning abortions after 15 weeks.
The case, Dobbs vs. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, deals with a 2018 Mississippi lawchallengedby the Center for Reproductive Rights, the law firm Paul Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, and the Mississippi Center for Justice on behalf of the last remaining abortion clinic in Mississippi — Jackson Women’s Health Organization.
After the Fifth Circuit Court of Appealsstruck downthe law in December 2019, the state of Mississippi asked the Supreme Court to take up the case.
Dobbs vs. Jackson Women’s Health Organization will touch on the landmark Roe v. Wade ruling since the Supreme Court will hear arguments on whether abortion bans prior to fetal viability are constitutional, signaling that the Court is focused on the constitutionality of legal limits on late-term abortions.
During her confirmation hearings last fall, Democrats, media outlets and activistsfixatedon Barrett’s adherence to Catholic principles and her large family, suggesting that she was “extreme” and unfit to serve on the Supreme Court.
But rather than making huge splashes in her interpretation of hot button cases as many conservatives have called on her to do, Barretthas thus far chosen to interpret narrowlyand to join with Justice Brett Kavanaugh and Chief Justice John Roberts over the more conservative justices.
The new justicejoineda 7-2 majority in June rejecting a challenge to the Affordable Care Act, though her critics hadwarnedthat Barrett would immediately take aim at Obamacare.
Progressive groups, media and activists alike reacted similarly when Kavanaugh replaced former Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, arguing that he was the fifth vote needed to overturn Roe v. Wade.
The emotional backlash against Kavanaugh’s confirmation escalated following multiple allegations of sexual assault against the future Supreme Court justice. Accuser Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyerwould later admitthat putting an “asterisk” next to Kavanaugh’s name before “he takes a scalpel” to Roe v. Wade was “part of what motivated Christine” to accuse him.
But liberal predictions that Kavanaugh would radicalize the court didn’t come to fruition after the it struck down a law that would significantly restrict abortion access: June Medical Services v. Russo, in which an abortion providerchallengeda law requiringabortionproviders to have admitting privileges to a hospital within 30 miles of the facility.
Chief Justice Robertssidedwith the liberal justice in a 5-4 ruling that struck down the Louisiana law. The decision was met with heavy criticism from conservatives, particularly because Roberts also voted with the liberal justices on recent DACA and LGBTQ rulings.
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact[email protected].
Read the full story at the Daily Caller News Foundation