TRENTON, NJ – Senator Ed Durr has voiced his staunch opposition to proposed legislation that seeks to redirect funds of up to $1 billion from ratepayers to a foreign company responsible for constructing a controversial wind farm off the coast of New Jersey. The legislation has raised concerns about the potential burden it may place on New Jersey ratepayers and the company’s alleged failure to adhere to prior agreements.
Durr, a Republican representing the third district, expressed his concerns regarding the current financial obligations imposed on New Jersey ratepayers, who already shoulder increased costs on their electric bills to support the development of offshore wind farms in close proximity to the state’s beaches. As part of the approval process, Ørsted, the foreign company in question, had committed to applying for and subsequently returning any federal tax incentives obtained to offset the higher costs currently being borne by ratepayers for the wind energy initiatives. However, Ørsted’s recent actions have raised doubts about their commitment to honoring this agreement.
According to Durr, Ørsted’s apparent request for significant financial assistance, at the expense of utility customers, indicates their realization that wind farm projects may not be economically viable without substantial government subsidies. As such, he strongly advocates against granting Ørsted the requested handout.
The Danish company has reportedly asserted that the completion of the wind farm projects could be jeopardized unless they are permitted to retain the tax incentives provided under the federal Inflation Reduction Act. However, Durr’s opposition underscores the potential adverse implications of granting such concessions, particularly at the expense of utility customers.
The ongoing debate surrounding the wind farm project raises critical questions about the balance between renewable energy development and the financial burden placed on ratepayers. As the legislation continues to be deliberated, stakeholders and lawmakers must carefully consider the implications for New Jersey’s energy landscape and the best approach to ensure a sustainable and fair outcome for all parties involved.