In 2019, during an interview with Don Lemon on CNN, Kamala Harris did indeed say, “I think we should have that conversation” when asked whether individuals such as sexual predators or those on death row should have the right to vote while still in prison.
This comment came during a broader discussion on criminal justice reform and voting rights for felons, sparked by a controversial debate in the Democratic primary over whether all incarcerated people, including those convicted of serious crimes, should retain the right to vote.
Harris’s statement was not a full endorsement of the policy but rather an expression of openness to discussing the issue. However, her remark led to significant backlash, particularly from critics who felt that she was not taking a firm enough stance against extending voting rights to people convicted of heinous crimes, such as murder or terrorism.
While Harris later clarified that she does believe serious crimes like murder should carry consequences, including losing the right to vote, the fact remains that she was willing to entertain the conversation, which has fueled controversy and political attacks. This “openness to a conversation” has often been framed as her supporting extreme policies.
The CNN audience appeared shocked and in disbelief at the now-presidential candidate’s comments on the subject.
