Jackson council candidates oppose flock cameras as police confirm royal grove system is privately owned

Jackson Council Candidates Oppose Flock Cameras as Police Confirm Royal Grove System Is Privately Owned

A Jackson Township political slate is calling for an end to Flock automated license plate readers, while police say two cameras in the Royal Grove neighborhood are owned by the homeowners association and are not connected to the department.

Jackson, NJ – When it comes to privately owned Flock security cameras capturing data from drivers on public roads in Jackson, one slate is saying, “No Flocking Way!”

A debate over automated license plate reader cameras has entered the Jackson Township political campaign after the Fight for Jackson slate publicly opposed the use of Flock Safety cameras, citing privacy concerns and constitutional rights, days after it was reported that privately owned systems are scanning publicly owned roads and citizens.

The statement comes after Shore News Network reported that two automated license plate reader (ALPR) cameras are installed at the entrances to the Royal Grove neighborhood, where they record license plates and other identifying information from vehicles traveling on public roads.

Candidates oppose automated license plate readers

In a statement posted on social media, the Fight for Jackson slate said it does not support Flock cameras or what it described as “mass surveillance” in Jackson Township.

“We believe our community can be both safe and free,” the group said. “Protecting public safety should never come at the expense of the constitutional rights and privacy of law-abiding citizens.”

The candidates also cited Fourth Amendment concerns, arguing that systems collecting and storing information about where people travel raise questions about privacy and government overreach.

The statement concluded, “No Flock Cameras. No Mass Surveillance. Liberty. Privacy. Jackson First.”

The slate includes mayoral candidate Elliott Shem-Tov and council candidates Amanda Trombetta and Chris Pollak.

Police say cameras are not connected to department

Following Shore News Network’s inquiry into the cameras, Jackson Police Chief Mary Nelson confirmed the department neither owns nor operates the system.

“The aforementioned cameras are not police cameras,” Nelson said in a statement. “They are owned and operated through the Royal Grove homeowners association.”

“The police department does not have any agreements with such cameras,” she added.

The cameras are located near the intersections of East Veterans Highway and Royal Grove Boulevard and Grand Boulevard and Royal Grove Boulevard. Based on their appearance, they are consistent with Flock Safety’s Falcon automated license plate reader system, which captures license plate images along with a vehicle’s make, model, color and direction of travel.

Jackson council candidates oppose flock cameras as police confirm royal grove system is privately owned
Photo: jackson council candidates oppose flock cameras as police confirm royal grove system is privately owned

Jackson Township Mayor Jennifer Kuhn, Council President Mordechai Burnstein, Council Vice President Giuseppe Palmeri and the rest of the council have remained silent on the matter since it was first reported.

Privacy debate continues

Supporters of automated license plate readers say the technology can help recover stolen vehicles, identify suspects and generate investigative leads.

Privacy advocates, including the American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, have argued that widespread deployment creates databases documenting the movements of law-abiding motorists and have raised concerns about data retention, access controls and potential misuse.

Because the Royal Grove cameras are privately owned by the homeowners association, Jackson police said the department does not have an agreement governing their use.

Shore News Network Staff Report

Shore News Network Staff Report is the official newsroom byline used by Shore News Network when a story is produced through the collaborative work of multiple members of the editorial team rather than a single reporter.

This newsroom account is reserved for articles that involve contributions from multiple journalists, editors, photographers, researchers, or news desk staff. It is also used for developing stories that are updated as new verified information becomes available, as well as for community announcements, weather coverage, public safety alerts, election results, and other newsroom-produced content.

Every article published under the Shore News Network Staff Report byline is reviewed and edited in accordance with the organization's editorial standards for accuracy, fairness, attribution, and transparency. Information is verified through official government agencies, court records, law enforcement, public documents, direct reporting, interviews, and other reliable primary and secondary sources before publication whenever possible.

The Staff Report account does not use artificial intelligence to independently generate news or publish unverified information. AI-assisted tools may occasionally be used for editorial support tasks such as transcription, formatting, grammar review, or workflow efficiency, but all published content is subject to human editorial oversight and approval by Shore News Network's newsroom staff.

As an independently owned digital news organization, Shore News Network is committed to original reporting, public safety journalism, government accountability, local community coverage, and breaking news throughout New Jersey and surrounding regions. Stories published under the Staff Report byline reflect the collective experience and editorial judgment of the Shore News Network newsroom.

Readers who have corrections, additional information, or news tips related to a Staff Report article are encouraged to contact the newsroom at news@shorenewsnetwork.com. Shore News Network welcomes factual corrections and updates as part of its commitment to accurate, transparent journalism.