Judge rules ice detention unlawful, orders bond hearing for detainee in new jersey

Judge rules ICE detention unlawful, orders bond hearing for detainee in New Jersey

Court finds Ecuadorian national held without hearing must be given chance for release.

Newark, NJ – A federal judge in New Jersey has ruled that an immigration detainee held at a state facility was unlawfully detained without a bond hearing, ordering that he be given an opportunity to seek release.

In a memorandum opinion, U.S. District Judge Susan D. Wigenton found that Elias Samuel Moposita Maliza, a citizen of Ecuador, was improperly held under a statute that allows for mandatory detention without bond.

Maliza has been detained at the Delaney Hall Detention Facility after being arrested by Department of Homeland Security agents on March 8. He has no final order of removal and has lived in the United States since July 2022, according to court records.

Court says detention statute was misapplied

The government argued that Maliza was properly detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2), which applies to certain individuals considered applicants for admission. However, the court rejected that argument, noting it had already ruled against similar interpretations in prior cases.

“Respondents acknowledge that the statutory arguments and facts in this case are materially identical to those that this Court has already rejected,” the opinion states.

Judge Wigenton determined that because Maliza was arrested within the interior of the United States after living in the country for an extended period, the government relied on the wrong statute.

“This Court concludes that Petitioner is being unlawfully detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1225,” the judge wrote.

Ruling affirms right to bond hearing

Instead, the court found that Maliza should have been detained under a different provision — 8 U.S.C. § 1226 — which allows detainees to seek bond and receive an individualized custody determination.

“Petitioner was apprehended inside the United States after residing here for an extended period, and therefore he should have been detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1226, which requires an opportunity to seek bond,” the opinion states.

The ruling grants Maliza’s habeas petition, finding his continued detention without a bond hearing violates federal law and due process protections.


Key Points

  • Federal judge rules ICE detention without bond hearing was unlawful
  • Court says wrong statute was used for detainee living in U.S. since 2022
  • Detainee must be given opportunity to seek release through bond hearing

ICE detention New Jersey, Elias Maliza case, habeas corpus immigration ruling, bond hearing ICE detainee, 8 USC 1226 vs 1225

Shore News Network

Phil Stilton is the Editor and Publisher of Shore News Network, an independent digital newsroom providing original reporting on New Jersey, national news, government, public policy, public safety, courts, and community affairs.

As founder of the publication, Stilton leads editorial strategy, investigative reporting, and daily newsroom operations while overseeing coverage that reaches millions of readers annually.

With extensive experience covering municipal government, county government, state legislatures, elections, law enforcement, emergency management, and public records, Stilton specializes in translating complex government actions into clear, factual reporting. His work frequently relies on primary source documents, including court filings, legislation, public meeting records, election finance disclosures, government databases, police reports, and Freedom of Information and Open Public Records Act (OPRA) requests. He has reported extensively on local government accountability, taxpayer spending, campaign finance, public corruption investigations, infrastructure, public safety, and the policies affecting New Jersey residents.

Under Stilton's editorial leadership, Shore News Network has grown into one of New Jersey's largest independent digital news organizations, publishing thousands of original news articles each year while providing breaking news coverage, investigative reporting, and analysis across state and local government. The publication's reporting is routinely sourced from official government agencies, public officials, court records, and firsthand documentation, with a commitment to transparency, attribution, corrections when warranted, and clearly distinguishing factual reporting from opinion.

Stilton's journalism follows established newsroom standards emphasizing accuracy, verification, fairness, and accountability. Every effort is made to verify information through official records and multiple reliable sources before publication. His reporting is intended to provide readers with timely, well-documented information that helps them understand the issues affecting their communities, while maintaining editorial independence from political parties, government agencies, advocacy organizations, and commercial interests.

Readers can submit story tips, corrections, public records, or media inquiries through the official Shore News Network website or its verified social media channels. Shore News Network welcomes corrections and updates when new information becomes available as part of its ongoing commitment to accurate and transparent journalism.