BALTIMORE, MD – A new statewide poll reveals strong resistance among Maryland voters to legalizing online casino gambling, with opposition climbing sharply as awareness of its risks grows.
The survey, conducted by Lake Research Partners and commissioned by the National Association Against iGaming (NAAiG), found that 71% of Marylanders oppose iGambling once they learn how it operates and its potential social costs.
Pollsters say opposition deepened as residents understood that iGambling allows 24/7 casino-style betting from smartphones, with 64% of respondents strongly against legalization.
Key Points
- 71% of Maryland voters oppose online casino gambling after learning about its risks
- Concerns center on addiction, youth access, and social harm
- National Association Against iGaming urges policymakers to reconsider legalization efforts
Awareness drives sharp increase in opposition
The survey of 650 registered voters, conducted September 15–18, showed that initial opposition stood at 52%. After respondents were informed that iGambling provides continuous access to casino games, opposition rose to 60%. When told about potential effects such as addiction and community costs, opposition climbed to 71%.
Nearly half of voters — 49% — said they had never heard of iGambling prior to the survey. After learning that it enables real-money gambling through mobile apps and websites at any hour, opposition intensified across all demographic groups.
Concerns about youth access and exploitation
Respondents expressed particular worry over youth exposure and predatory practices. Fifty-seven percent said they were concerned that iGambling platforms fail to adequately prevent teenagers and children from gambling online. More than half — 53% — voiced fears that large gaming operators could exploit vulnerable populations for profit.
NAAiG Board Member Jason Gumer, who also serves as Executive Vice President and General Counsel at Monarch Casino & Resort, said the results reflect a growing unease about iGambling’s reach. “Once Marylanders understand what iGambling really is, they strongly reject it,” Gumer said. “Voters are deeply concerned about the risks to children, families, and communities.”
Economic and social costs under scrutiny
Citing data from neighboring New Jersey, where iGambling is legal, the NAAiG report notes that related social costs — including addiction treatment, welfare, homelessness, and criminal justice expenses — are estimated at $350 million annually.
The group argues that online gambling undermines community-based economic reinvestment and local job creation tied to in-person gaming facilities.
NAAiG pushes for responsible gaming policies
The National Association Against iGaming describes itself as a coalition of business and community leaders advocating for responsible, land-based gaming and consumer protection. The organization says it is working with policymakers nationwide to strengthen safeguards against illegal online gambling and deceptive digital marketing practices.
More information about the organization and its latest research can be found at www.naaig.org.
