New jersey attorney general jennifer davenport is leading a multistate effort opposing proposed federal firearms regulation rollbacks that states say would weaken gun safety laws and hinder criminal investigations.
New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport is leading a multistate effort opposing proposed federal firearms regulation rollbacks that states say would weaken gun safety laws and hinder criminal investigations.

New Jersey AG Leads 23-State Fight Against ATF Gun Rights Rollbacks

Posted by
2 mins read
August 10, 2026
New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport is leading a coalition of 23 attorneys general urging the federal government to abandon proposed firearms regulation rollbacks they say would weaken background checks, hamper criminal investigations, and increase gun violence.

TRENTON, N.J. — New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport has joined attorneys general from 22 other states in opposing a series of proposed firearms regulation changes by the Trump administration’s Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF).

The coalition submitted multiple comment letters warning that the proposed regulatory changes would make it easier for prohibited individuals to obtain firearms, weaken law enforcement’s ability to trace crime guns, and reverse years of gun violence prevention efforts.

According to the Attorney General’s Office, the ATF announced plans earlier this year to “reform” 34 firearms regulations. The coalition argues many of those proposals exceed the agency’s legal authority and conflict with federal law.

Coalition warns of public safety impacts

“ATF’s plan to deregulate firearms will put New Jerseyans at risk and erode the tremendous gains we have made in reducing gun violence over the past few years,” Davenport said.

She added, “In addition to endangering families simply going about their days, this effort to eviscerate sensible gun regulations will also imperil law enforcement and first responders, who regularly put themselves in harm’s way to protect or rescue us.”

The coalition argues the proposals would weaken background checks required under the Brady Act, loosen licensing requirements for gun dealers, reduce oversight of online firearm purchases, make it more difficult to revoke licenses from dealers who repeatedly violate federal law, and eliminate long-standing recordkeeping requirements used by investigators to trace firearms recovered in crimes.

Officials also expressed concern over proposals that would ease restrictions on importing military-style firearm parts, eliminate mandatory handgun safety notices displayed by licensed dealers, create uncertainty over regulations governing pistol stabilizing braces, and require destruction of firearm transaction records after 20 or 30 years instead of retaining them indefinitely.

Attorneys general challenge multiple proposed ATF changes

The coalition also warned that changes to ATF Form 4473—the federal document completed during firearm purchases—could make it harder for law enforcement to investigate crimes involving firearms.

Another proposal criticized by the states would narrow the federal definition used to prohibit certain individuals with serious mental illness from possessing firearms.

According to the Attorney General’s Office, the ATF itself acknowledged in its analysis that the proposal could increase public safety risks, stating, “This risk may be minimal, or may be considerably greater (up to and including potential mass casualty events).”

The attorneys general also opposed proposed revisions to regulations under the National Firearms Act, which governs machine guns, silencers, and short-barreled rifles and shotguns.

Davenport co-led the effort with the attorneys general of California, Illinois, Maryland and New York. Attorneys general from 18 additional states and the District of Columbia joined all or portions of the comment letters submitted to the ATF.

Key Points

  • New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport is co-leading a 23-state coalition opposing proposed ATF firearms regulation changes.
  • The coalition says the proposals would weaken background checks, firearm tracing, and gun dealer oversight.
  • The attorneys general submitted multiple comment letters urging the ATF to revise or withdraw the proposed rules.

FAQ

What is the coalition opposing?
A series of proposed ATF regulatory changes affecting firearms sales, licensing, background checks, recordkeeping, and enforcement.

Why do the attorneys general oppose the proposals?
They argue the changes would weaken public safety, make criminal investigations more difficult, and conflict with existing federal law.

Who is leading the effort?
New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport is co-leading the coalition with attorneys general from California, Illinois, Maryland, and New York.

How many states joined the coalition?
Twenty-three attorneys general participated in all or part of the effort.

What happens next?
The ATF will review public comments before deciding whether to finalize, modify, or withdraw the proposed regulations.

Source: New Jersey Office of the Attorney General, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives

New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport is leading a multistate effort opposing proposed federal firearms regulation rollbacks that states say would weaken gun safety laws and hinder criminal investigations.

Phil Stilton

Phil Stilton is the Editor and Publisher of Shore News Network, an independent digital newsroom providing original reporting on New Jersey, national news, government, public policy, public safety, courts, and community affairs.

As founder of the publication, Stilton leads editorial strategy, investigative reporting, and daily newsroom operations while overseeing coverage that reaches millions of readers annually.

With extensive experience covering municipal government, county government, state legislatures, elections, law enforcement, emergency management, and public records, Stilton specializes in translating complex government actions into clear, factual reporting. His work frequently relies on primary source documents, including court filings, legislation, public meeting records, election finance disclosures, government databases, police reports, and Freedom of Information and Open Public Records Act (OPRA) requests. He has reported extensively on local government accountability, taxpayer spending, campaign finance, public corruption investigations, infrastructure, public safety, and the policies affecting New Jersey residents.

Under Stilton's editorial leadership, Shore News Network has grown into one of New Jersey's largest independent digital news organizations, publishing thousands of original news articles each year while providing breaking news coverage, investigative reporting, and analysis across state and local government. The publication's reporting is routinely sourced from official government agencies, public officials, court records, and firsthand documentation, with a commitment to transparency, attribution, corrections when warranted, and clearly distinguishing factual reporting from opinion.

Stilton's journalism follows established newsroom standards emphasizing accuracy, verification, fairness, and accountability. Every effort is made to verify information through official records and multiple reliable sources before publication. His reporting is intended to provide readers with timely, well-documented information that helps them understand the issues affecting their communities, while maintaining editorial independence from political parties, government agencies, advocacy organizations, and commercial interests.

Readers can submit story tips, corrections, public records, or media inquiries through the official Shore News Network website or its verified social media channels. Shore News Network welcomes corrections and updates when new information becomes available as part of its ongoing commitment to accurate and transparent journalism.

Don't Miss