Toms river planning board denies new five story downtown apartment building

Toms River planning board denies new five story downtown apartment building

TOMS RIVER, N.J. — A second large apartment complex planned for Downtown Toms River was rejected last night by the planning board due to the impact the non-conforming project would pose to the community and the variances required to build it.

Instead, that project must go through the township’s zoning board to move forward. The application did not conform to the zoning of the downtown district, which limits structures to just four stories.

A previously planned 10-story tower got initial approval under a downtown redevelopment plan created by former Mayor Mo Hill. Still, that plan has since been rescinded, meaning all future non-conforming buildings must once again go to the proper land use board.

The Toms River planning board has denied a proposal to build a 64-unit apartment complex with ground-floor retail space in the downtown area, citing safety, zoning, and traffic concerns. The project, proposed by Lakewood-based Waterfront Development Partners, LLC, aimed to redevelop a site at 101 West Water Street but faced opposition from local officials and residents worried about its impact on the historic downtown.

The five-story design included 64 apartments—15 one-bedroom, 41 two-bedroom, and eight three-bedroom units—with 2,560 square feet of retail space on the ground floor and parking with an average of 1.4 spaces per unit. This configuration, however, conflicted with the zoning rules for the Village Business (VB) district, which caps building height at four stories and requires full retail occupancy on the first floor. Board members raised concerns about how the project would affect traffic flow and pedestrian safety in the already-busy downtown.

Attorney Robert C. Shea, representing Waterfront Development Partners, argued that the project complied with a previously established redevelopment plan, which designated parts of the downtown as areas needing revitalization. Shea contended that the project aligned with the township’s goals for redevelopment. Still, Toms River officials pointed out that the developer did not have a formal redevelopment agreement with the township. Without such an agreement, the project must comply with all standard zoning regulations, which the proposed design did not meet.

Rodrick said that township officials had met with Shea before the planning board’s review to discuss potential issues with the plan.

“We expressed our concerns with what he was asking for,” Rodrick said, “and he told us that this was their application, and they’re not changing, it and that we should go pound salt.”

Rodrick also said the developer was playing ‘timeline games,’ postponing their hearing twice. When the third meeting was rescheduled due to a meeting room scheduling conflict, Rodrick said the developer went to the state to try to get automatic approval because of the delay. The builder lost that case in court and the matter was sent back to the planning board by the judge.

The board’s rejection of the proposal is the latest chapter in an ongoing debate over the future of downtown Toms River. In recent years, redevelopment plans have sparked controversy, as some residents feel high-density projects would alter the area’s traditional character. The proposed building’s height, limited parking, and partial retail use on the ground floor all ran counter to zoning restrictions meant to preserve the scale and commercial vitality of the downtown district.

Waterfront Development Partners had also sought a multi-decade tax abatement for the complex, a common feature of redevelopment deals but one that has faced increased scrutiny in Toms River. Critics argue that such long-term tax incentives can strain municipal resources and may not bring the anticipated economic benefits.

This denial comes as Toms River officials are reconsidering another redevelopment plan that would have enabled the construction of a large residential tower with a public promenade and amphitheater along the Toms River waterfront. Public backlash against that project led the township council to move toward repealing parts of the downtown redevelopment ordinance, which currently allows for large-scale mixed-use developments in certain areas.

The planning board is reviewing the repeal measure, which would eventually need council approval to take effect.

Rodrick and his team won a landslide victory in 2023, with a 70-30% voting margin. Their key platform was to stop overdevelopment and overturn the downtown redevelopment plan, which allowed for 10—and 12-story apartment buildings.

That plan was championed by the former administration who sought to turn the downtown village into a bustling small city.

A Shore News Network poll in 2023 showed that 73% of Toms River residents opposed that city vision.

Shore News Network

Phil Stilton is the Editor and Publisher of Shore News Network, an independent digital newsroom providing original reporting on New Jersey, national news, government, public policy, public safety, courts, and community affairs.

As founder of the publication, Stilton leads editorial strategy, investigative reporting, and daily newsroom operations while overseeing coverage that reaches millions of readers annually.

With extensive experience covering municipal government, county government, state legislatures, elections, law enforcement, emergency management, and public records, Stilton specializes in translating complex government actions into clear, factual reporting. His work frequently relies on primary source documents, including court filings, legislation, public meeting records, election finance disclosures, government databases, police reports, and Freedom of Information and Open Public Records Act (OPRA) requests. He has reported extensively on local government accountability, taxpayer spending, campaign finance, public corruption investigations, infrastructure, public safety, and the policies affecting New Jersey residents.

Under Stilton's editorial leadership, Shore News Network has grown into one of New Jersey's largest independent digital news organizations, publishing thousands of original news articles each year while providing breaking news coverage, investigative reporting, and analysis across state and local government. The publication's reporting is routinely sourced from official government agencies, public officials, court records, and firsthand documentation, with a commitment to transparency, attribution, corrections when warranted, and clearly distinguishing factual reporting from opinion.

Stilton's journalism follows established newsroom standards emphasizing accuracy, verification, fairness, and accountability. Every effort is made to verify information through official records and multiple reliable sources before publication. His reporting is intended to provide readers with timely, well-documented information that helps them understand the issues affecting their communities, while maintaining editorial independence from political parties, government agencies, advocacy organizations, and commercial interests.

Readers can submit story tips, corrections, public records, or media inquiries through the official Shore News Network website or its verified social media channels. Shore News Network welcomes corrections and updates when new information becomes available as part of its ongoing commitment to accurate and transparent journalism.