WASHINGTON, DC — A Mexican family facing deportation is urging the U.S. Supreme Court to take up their case, arguing that immigration authorities failed to properly evaluate credible threats to their lives from a violent cartel.

Fabian Lagunas-Espinoza and his relatives entered the United States in September 2021 after allegedly being forced out of their home in Guerrero, Mexico. In a petition filed with the Supreme Court on Wednesday, the family claims members of the Los Rojos cartel confronted them in August 2021, threatening to kill them unless they fled their home within 24 hours.

“They complied, fled their town, and entered the United States shortly thereafter,” the petition states. The filing also says that one brother had been physically assaulted by cartel members, while another was forced to leave after receiving threats for witnessing criminal activity.

An immigration judge determined that the family’s account was credible but still denied their request for asylum and protection under the Convention Against Torture. The Board of Immigration Appeals later upheld the decision, which the family argues was based on flawed legal reasoning and factual errors.

Legal challenges to the deportation order

According to the petition, the Board allegedly made its own determinations about the risk of torture if the family were returned to Mexico, despite the initial judge not making any detailed findings on that issue. The family argues this overstepped the Board’s authority and ignored both statutory requirements and Supreme Court precedent.

The family contends that their due process rights were violated and that critical evidence supporting their claims was not properly considered during the asylum process. The petition also raises concerns about how immigration law was applied in their case.

Despite submitting documentation and testimony about the danger they say awaits them in Mexico, immigration authorities concluded the family did not meet the legal standards for protection.

Key Points

A Mexican family is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review their deportation case involving threats from a drug cartel.
They claim cartel members ordered them to flee their home or be killed, prompting their entry into the U.S. in 2021.
Immigration courts acknowledged their testimony as credible but denied relief under asylum and torture protection laws.

The Supreme Court has not yet indicated whether it will hear the case, which could impact how similar claims involving cartel threats are handled in the future.

Phil Stilton Latest posts

Phil Stilton is the Editor and Publisher of Shore News Network, an independent digital newsroom providing original reporting on New Jersey, national news, government, public policy, public safety, courts, and community affairs.

As founder of the publication, Stilton leads editorial strategy, investigative reporting, and daily newsroom operations while overseeing coverage that reaches millions of readers annually.

With extensive experience covering municipal government, county government, state legislatures, elections, law enforcement, emergency management, and public records, Stilton specializes in translating complex government actions into clear, factual reporting. His work frequently relies on primary source documents, including court filings, legislation, public meeting records, election finance disclosures, government databases, police reports, and Freedom of Information and Open Public Records Act (OPRA) requests. He has reported extensively on local government accountability, taxpayer spending, campaign finance, public corruption investigations, infrastructure, public safety, and the policies affecting New Jersey residents.

Under Stilton's editorial leadership, Shore News Network has grown into one of New Jersey's largest independent digital news organizations, publishing thousands of original news articles each year while providing breaking news coverage, investigative reporting, and analysis across state and local government. The publication's reporting is routinely sourced from official government agencies, public officials, court records, and firsthand documentation, with a commitment to transparency, attribution, corrections when warranted, and clearly distinguishing factual reporting from opinion.

Stilton's journalism follows established newsroom standards emphasizing accuracy, verification, fairness, and accountability. Every effort is made to verify information through official records and multiple reliable sources before publication. His reporting is intended to provide readers with timely, well-documented information that helps them understand the issues affecting their communities, while maintaining editorial independence from political parties, government agencies, advocacy organizations, and commercial interests.

Readers can submit story tips, corrections, public records, or media inquiries through the official Shore News Network website or its verified social media channels. Shore News Network welcomes corrections and updates when new information becomes available as part of its ongoing commitment to accurate and transparent journalism.