Wiretap
Wiretap

NJ man’s lawsuit over 2019 wiretap arrest tossed as court says it’s six years too late

CAMDEN, NJ – A New Jersey man’s lawsuit against the State Police and a former county prosecutor over an allegedly unlawful wiretap arrest has been thrown out by a federal judge who ruled the claims were filed years after the legal deadline.

Evans Exantus brought the civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that in August 2019, New Jersey State Police detectives unlawfully intercepted his phone calls and wrongfully arrested him based on the recorded conversations. He claimed the resulting first-degree charges were later dismissed and that the officers and prosecutors involved committed malicious prosecution, false imprisonment, and other constitutional violations.

In a ruling issued Monday, U.S. District Chief Judge Renée Marie Bumb dismissed the lawsuit without prejudice, finding that the claims were clearly barred by New Jersey’s two-year statute of limitations for civil rights violations. Exantus filed the complaint in July 2025—nearly six years after the alleged conduct occurred.

While the court acknowledged Exantus’s in forma pauperis status and construed the handwritten complaint liberally due to his pro se filing, it concluded that all of his § 1983 claims—ranging from abuse of process to Monell claims for failure to train—were untimely on their face.

The court did leave a narrow door open, granting Exantus permission to file an amended complaint if he can plausibly allege a legal basis to toll the statute of limitations or show that the date of accrual falls within the required two-year window.

Named defendants included Col. Patrick J. Callahan, former Superintendent of the New Jersey State Police; Damon Tyner, former Atlantic County Prosecutor; and unnamed detectives involved in the 2019 wiretap operation.

Shore News Network Staff Report

Shore News Network Staff Report is the official newsroom byline used by Shore News Network when a story is produced through the collaborative work of multiple members of the editorial team rather than a single reporter.

This newsroom account is reserved for articles that involve contributions from multiple journalists, editors, photographers, researchers, or news desk staff. It is also used for developing stories that are updated as new verified information becomes available, as well as for community announcements, weather coverage, public safety alerts, election results, and other newsroom-produced content.

Every article published under the Shore News Network Staff Report byline is reviewed and edited in accordance with the organization's editorial standards for accuracy, fairness, attribution, and transparency. Information is verified through official government agencies, court records, law enforcement, public documents, direct reporting, interviews, and other reliable primary and secondary sources before publication whenever possible.

The Staff Report account does not use artificial intelligence to independently generate news or publish unverified information. AI-assisted tools may occasionally be used for editorial support tasks such as transcription, formatting, grammar review, or workflow efficiency, but all published content is subject to human editorial oversight and approval by Shore News Network's newsroom staff.

As an independently owned digital news organization, Shore News Network is committed to original reporting, public safety journalism, government accountability, local community coverage, and breaking news throughout New Jersey and surrounding regions. Stories published under the Staff Report byline reflect the collective experience and editorial judgment of the Shore News Network newsroom.

Readers who have corrections, additional information, or news tips related to a Staff Report article are encouraged to contact the newsroom at news@shorenewsnetwork.com. Shore News Network welcomes factual corrections and updates as part of its commitment to accurate, transparent journalism.