“Assembly criticism targets limits on ICE cooperation in newly signed laws.”
Trenton, NJ – A New Jersey assemblyman is publicly criticizing a series of newly signed immigration laws by Governor Mikie Sherrill, calling the measures a threat to public safety and a departure from cooperation with federal authorities. The remarks, posted online by Assembly candidate Greg Myhre, come as the state moves forward with policies limiting how local law enforcement interacts with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Myhre’s statement focused on three bills signed into law that restrict coordination between state agencies and federal immigration officials. He characterized the legislation as a “major setback,” arguing it will complicate policing efforts and create broader conflicts with federal enforcement priorities.
“Governor Mikie Sherrill signed three controversial anti-ICE bills into law, and it’s a massive but predictable mistake for the Garden State,” Myhre said.
Key Points
- Assembly candidate Greg Myhre criticized new laws limiting ICE cooperation in New Jersey
- The legislation signed by Governor Sherrill restricts coordination between local police and federal immigration authorities
- Critics argue the laws could impact public safety and create conflict with federal enforcement policy
Lawmaker outlines concerns over enforcement limits
Myhre’s criticism centered on what he described as reduced tools for law enforcement agencies. He argued that limiting communication with ICE could hinder efforts to identify and detain individuals accused of crimes.
“Law enforcement should have every tool available to keep criminals off our streets. Blocking communication with ICE makes it HARDER to locate, question, detain, and deport dangerous individuals who do not belong in our communities,” he said.
He also warned the laws could place New Jersey at odds with federal immigration policy under the Trump administration, which has emphasized stricter enforcement both at the border and within the country.
“These new laws put NJ on a direct collision course with federal law,” Myhre said.
Debate reflects broader policy divide in New Jersey
The criticism highlights an ongoing divide in New Jersey over immigration enforcement and the role of state governments in federal policy. Supporters of sanctuary-style policies have argued such measures protect civil rights and build trust between immigrant communities and local police, while opponents contend they limit enforcement capabilities.
Myhre also raised concerns about resource allocation, suggesting local departments may face challenges navigating the new restrictions.
“Instead of working to fight crime with every available resource our police are now caught in the middle of political mandates that prioritize shielding ILLEGAL ALIENS over Federal cooperation,” he said.
He contrasted the current approach with that of former Governor Phil Murphy, adding, “Even Governor Murphy was wise enough to toss these bills into the round file.”
The debate comes as Governor Sherrill continues to position her administration in opposition to federal immigration enforcement policies, a stance that has drawn both support and criticism across the state.
