U. S. Consitution written by a. I. According to industry leading detectors

Who actually wrote the U.S. Constitution? According to a ChatGPT detector, the articles that laid the framework of our great nation were written by A.I.

ZeroGPT, a popular tool used to predict whether or not a piece of literary work is A.I. generated, found the Constitution to be 98.7% A.I. generated.

So, what does that mean? Does it mean Elon Musk and Donald Trump went back to the future at some point in the near future and used A.I. technology to help our founding fathers write the framework of our nation?

Let’s hope not.

Another GPT checker app confirmed, the Constitution and other historical documents appear to be A.I. generated.

According to Edward Tian, the creator of GPTZero, an AI writing catcher service, the explanation is straightforward. GPTZero also discovered that the biblical book of Genesis is 88% computerized.

“The US Constitution is a text fed repeatedly into the training data of many large language models,” he told Ars Technica. “Many of these large language models are trained to generate similar text to the Constitution and other frequently used training texts. GPTZero predicts text likely to be generated by large language models, and thus this fascinating phenomenon occurs.”

The entire ordeal proves a few things. ChatGPT will most likely never replace human creativity because it has obvious limitations. It also proves that college professors worldwide have their work cut out as AI is mainly used by college students looking to cut corners on papers.

At this time, there’s almost no actual practical use for ChatGPT and other AI apps, despite the hysteria in Washington, D.C.

While the thought of Trump and Musk going back in time and altering the constitution to suit Trump’s agenda, the biggest threat faced by A.I. text generation is quality control and copyright infringement.

Just to be sure, we asked ChatGPT, “Did Donald Trump and Elon Musk go back in time and alter the U.S. Constitution using artificial intelligence?”

“As of my last update in September 2021, there were no credible reports or evidence suggesting that Donald Trump and Elon Musk went back in time to alter the U.S. Constitution using artificial intelligence or other means,” ChatGPT told us. “Time travel is currently considered to be a speculative concept and has not been scientifically proven or demonstrated to be possible. The U.S. Constitution is a historically significant and legally binding document, and any claims of alterations or tampering would require substantial evidence to be taken seriously.

“It’s essential to rely on reputable sources and verified information when discussing historical events or matters involving prominent figures. If there have been any developments or news related to this topic since my last update, I recommend checking trustworthy news outlets for the latest information,” the A.I. Chat bot confirmed.”

After running this article through the GPT detectors, we’re pretty confident it, too has been unaffected by a time-warping SpaceX Musk and Trump mission. It was deemed “Most Likely Human Written.”

Our findings show that ChatGPT is a lousy tool, especially in the journalism industry and ChatGPT detectors are equally lousy tools.

[ ] Stop Generating…

Phil Stilton Latest posts

Phil Stilton is the Editor and Publisher of Shore News Network, an independent digital newsroom providing original reporting on New Jersey, national news, government, public policy, public safety, courts, and community affairs.

As founder of the publication, Stilton leads editorial strategy, investigative reporting, and daily newsroom operations while overseeing coverage that reaches millions of readers annually.

With extensive experience covering municipal government, county government, state legislatures, elections, law enforcement, emergency management, and public records, Stilton specializes in translating complex government actions into clear, factual reporting. His work frequently relies on primary source documents, including court filings, legislation, public meeting records, election finance disclosures, government databases, police reports, and Freedom of Information and Open Public Records Act (OPRA) requests. He has reported extensively on local government accountability, taxpayer spending, campaign finance, public corruption investigations, infrastructure, public safety, and the policies affecting New Jersey residents.

Under Stilton's editorial leadership, Shore News Network has grown into one of New Jersey's largest independent digital news organizations, publishing thousands of original news articles each year while providing breaking news coverage, investigative reporting, and analysis across state and local government. The publication's reporting is routinely sourced from official government agencies, public officials, court records, and firsthand documentation, with a commitment to transparency, attribution, corrections when warranted, and clearly distinguishing factual reporting from opinion.

Stilton's journalism follows established newsroom standards emphasizing accuracy, verification, fairness, and accountability. Every effort is made to verify information through official records and multiple reliable sources before publication. His reporting is intended to provide readers with timely, well-documented information that helps them understand the issues affecting their communities, while maintaining editorial independence from political parties, government agencies, advocacy organizations, and commercial interests.

Readers can submit story tips, corrections, public records, or media inquiries through the official Shore News Network website or its verified social media channels. Shore News Network welcomes corrections and updates when new information becomes available as part of its ongoing commitment to accurate and transparent journalism.