TOMS RIVER, NJ — Danish energy company Orsted will discontinue development of two major offshore wind projects, Ocean Wind 1 and 2, near New Jersey, the firm confirmed this week. The announcement came after Orsted recognized potential losses up to DKK 16 billion ($2.266 billion), attributing the negative outcome to supply chain issues and rising interest rates.

Representative Chris Smith (R-Manchester) responded to the development, noting Orsted’s conclusion to cease these projects due to financial losses despite substantial taxpayer subsidies and projected consumer cost increases. Smith highlighted this move as an initial step in revealing the financial and environmental flaws of such offshore endeavors.

“Turns out that despite huge taxpayer subsidies and credible predictions of big increases to ratepayers, Orsted has concluded that they will still lose money,” Smith said. “Orsted’s decision was a first step in exposing the economic unsustainability and environmental dangerousness of ocean wind turbines—each the size of the Chrysler Building in New York City—and Orsted’s pulling out of the deal may help slow and eventually halt similar projects off New Jersey’s coast.”

The termination of these projects has been deemed a success by local constituents, environmental advocates, and New Jersey’s fishing community, who have allied with Smith and Representative Jeff Van Drew in opposition to the proposed maritime industrial activities. These groups have raised concerns over the potentially devastating effects on marine life, fisheries, tourism, and the safety of navigation and aviation due to radar interference.

The U.S. House of Representatives passed a Smith-authored amendment on July 20, necessitating presidential certification that offshore wind farms will not disrupt aviation or military radar systems. This legislation is currently awaiting Senate consideration.

Smith referenced several studies to support his position, including a 2020 Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) analysis on radar interference, a 2017 interagency study on the unique impacts to coastal radar systems by offshore wind turbines, and a 2022 National Academy of Sciences report indicating a lack of mitigation techniques for wind turbine generator interference.

In addition, a House-approved amendment in March, which received bipartisan support, mandates a Government Accountability Office (GAO) investigation into the environmental and industrial impacts of wind turbines. The results of this audit, initiated by Smith in June, are anticipated shortly.

Phil Stilton Latest posts

Phil Stilton is the Editor and Publisher of Shore News Network, an independent digital newsroom providing original reporting on New Jersey, national news, government, public policy, public safety, courts, and community affairs.

As founder of the publication, Stilton leads editorial strategy, investigative reporting, and daily newsroom operations while overseeing coverage that reaches millions of readers annually.

With extensive experience covering municipal government, county government, state legislatures, elections, law enforcement, emergency management, and public records, Stilton specializes in translating complex government actions into clear, factual reporting. His work frequently relies on primary source documents, including court filings, legislation, public meeting records, election finance disclosures, government databases, police reports, and Freedom of Information and Open Public Records Act (OPRA) requests. He has reported extensively on local government accountability, taxpayer spending, campaign finance, public corruption investigations, infrastructure, public safety, and the policies affecting New Jersey residents.

Under Stilton's editorial leadership, Shore News Network has grown into one of New Jersey's largest independent digital news organizations, publishing thousands of original news articles each year while providing breaking news coverage, investigative reporting, and analysis across state and local government. The publication's reporting is routinely sourced from official government agencies, public officials, court records, and firsthand documentation, with a commitment to transparency, attribution, corrections when warranted, and clearly distinguishing factual reporting from opinion.

Stilton's journalism follows established newsroom standards emphasizing accuracy, verification, fairness, and accountability. Every effort is made to verify information through official records and multiple reliable sources before publication. His reporting is intended to provide readers with timely, well-documented information that helps them understand the issues affecting their communities, while maintaining editorial independence from political parties, government agencies, advocacy organizations, and commercial interests.

Readers can submit story tips, corrections, public records, or media inquiries through the official Shore News Network website or its verified social media channels. Shore News Network welcomes corrections and updates when new information becomes available as part of its ongoing commitment to accurate and transparent journalism.