Kamala Harris recently claimed that Republicans and Trump blocked a bill that would have allocated $20 billion for border security. The truth behind this claim involves some significant details that reveal why the bill faced opposition.

Continue Reading

New Jersey Supreme Court to Rule on COVID Hazard Pay Dispute for School Workers

Trenton, NJ - The New Jersey Supreme Court is scheduled to issue a decision Wednesday in a closely…

Seaside Heights Once Touted as a Premier Destination for “Girl Watching”

If you've ever wondered what Seaside Heights looked like before Snooki, Karma nightclub, and the famous boardwalk brawls,…

Congress Demands New Jersey Surrender Documents in Non-Citizen Voting Scandal

Trenton, NJ - The Republican chairmen of two House committees have formally demanded records from the New Jersey…

First, the bill did indeed include $20 billion specifically earmarked for border security. This funding was intended to expand border patrol, hire new asylum officers, and implement other measures to strengthen the U.S.-Mexico border. However, the bill wasn’t solely about the border. In fact, the majority of the funds in this “border bill” were allocated for other international concerns, totaling over $94 billion.

Here’s a breakdown of where the rest of the money was going:

$60.06 billion to support Ukraine in its ongoing conflict with Russia, which is roughly three times more than the border security funds.
$14.1 billion for security assistance to Israel.
$10 billion for humanitarian aid to civilians in Gaza, the West Bank, Ukraine, and other conflict zones.
$4.83 billion to support allies in the Indo-Pacific and deter Chinese aggression.
$2.44 billion for operations in the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) region, which includes addressing unrest in the Red Sea.
$2.33 billion to continue support for Ukrainian refugees displaced by the war.
$400 million for the Nonprofit Security Grant Program, helping nonprofits and places of worship enhance their security.

Republicans and Trump opposed the bill, not just because of the border security provisions, but largely due to the significant spending on these unrelated international issues. They argued that the bill was overloaded with expenditures that had little to do with directly addressing the border crisis, leading them to block it.

So, while Harris is correct that $20 billion in border funding was part of the bill, it’s also true that the majority of the funds were designated for other purposes, which is why the bill faced such strong opposition from Republicans.

Phil Stilton Latest posts

Phil Stilton is the Editor and Publisher of Shore News Network, an independent digital newsroom providing original reporting on New Jersey, national news, government, public policy, public safety, courts, and community affairs.

As founder of the publication, Stilton leads editorial strategy, investigative reporting, and daily newsroom operations while overseeing coverage that reaches millions of readers annually.

With extensive experience covering municipal government, county government, state legislatures, elections, law enforcement, emergency management, and public records, Stilton specializes in translating complex government actions into clear, factual reporting. His work frequently relies on primary source documents, including court filings, legislation, public meeting records, election finance disclosures, government databases, police reports, and Freedom of Information and Open Public Records Act (OPRA) requests. He has reported extensively on local government accountability, taxpayer spending, campaign finance, public corruption investigations, infrastructure, public safety, and the policies affecting New Jersey residents.

Under Stilton's editorial leadership, Shore News Network has grown into one of New Jersey's largest independent digital news organizations, publishing thousands of original news articles each year while providing breaking news coverage, investigative reporting, and analysis across state and local government. The publication's reporting is routinely sourced from official government agencies, public officials, court records, and firsthand documentation, with a commitment to transparency, attribution, corrections when warranted, and clearly distinguishing factual reporting from opinion.

Stilton's journalism follows established newsroom standards emphasizing accuracy, verification, fairness, and accountability. Every effort is made to verify information through official records and multiple reliable sources before publication. His reporting is intended to provide readers with timely, well-documented information that helps them understand the issues affecting their communities, while maintaining editorial independence from political parties, government agencies, advocacy organizations, and commercial interests.

Readers can submit story tips, corrections, public records, or media inquiries through the official Shore News Network website or its verified social media channels. Shore News Network welcomes corrections and updates when new information becomes available as part of its ongoing commitment to accurate and transparent journalism.