Federal judge denies convicted new jersey bank robber’s latest bid to overturn sentence in long-running career offender dispute

NEWARK, NJ — A New Jersey man serving more than 26 years in federal prison for a string of armed bank robberies has been denied in his latest attempt to reduce his sentence, after a federal judge rejected his motion to undo a prior ruling based on claims of legal error and new evidence.

Joseph McAdams, who pleaded guilty in 2009 to ten counts of bank robbery and one count of brandishing a firearm, filed a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4) and (d)(1) asking the court to vacate the judgment against him. U.S. District Judge Edward S. Kiel denied the motion on procedural and substantive grounds and declined to issue a certificate of appealability.

McAdams had argued that his classification as a “career offender” — which added significant time to his sentence — was based on improperly counted prior convictions, including one from 1979 that he claimed should have been excluded under federal sentencing guidelines. He was sentenced in 2010 to 235 months on the robbery charges and an additional mandatory 84 months on the gun charge, totaling 319 months (26 years and 7 months).

The court had previously examined McAdams’s arguments in multiple rounds of litigation. In 2013, he filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 claiming ineffective counsel and an erroneous sentencing enhancement. An evidentiary hearing in 2014 revealed that two of McAdams’s older convictions from the 1980s were ineligible as predicate offenses — a partial win for him — but the court still found that a February 1979 armed robbery conviction could be counted, upholding the “career offender” designation.

McAdams later submitted parole records and a revised judgment from state court to show he had not been incarcerated within the required 15-year window before his federal offense. However, his motions were dismissed as second or successive § 2255 petitions, over which the court lacked jurisdiction without approval from the appellate court.

In his most recent motion, McAdams again attempted to argue that the court erred in its judgment, but Judge Kiel found that the claims had already been litigated and did not justify reopening the case under Rule 60. No response was filed by the U.S. government, and the court ruled on the written record.

Unless he secures further relief through higher courts, McAdams remains bound by the original sentence imposed more than 15 years ago.

Phil Stilton Latest posts

Phil Stilton is the Editor and Publisher of Shore News Network, an independent digital newsroom providing original reporting on New Jersey, national news, government, public policy, public safety, courts, and community affairs.

As founder of the publication, Stilton leads editorial strategy, investigative reporting, and daily newsroom operations while overseeing coverage that reaches millions of readers annually.

With extensive experience covering municipal government, county government, state legislatures, elections, law enforcement, emergency management, and public records, Stilton specializes in translating complex government actions into clear, factual reporting. His work frequently relies on primary source documents, including court filings, legislation, public meeting records, election finance disclosures, government databases, police reports, and Freedom of Information and Open Public Records Act (OPRA) requests. He has reported extensively on local government accountability, taxpayer spending, campaign finance, public corruption investigations, infrastructure, public safety, and the policies affecting New Jersey residents.

Under Stilton's editorial leadership, Shore News Network has grown into one of New Jersey's largest independent digital news organizations, publishing thousands of original news articles each year while providing breaking news coverage, investigative reporting, and analysis across state and local government. The publication's reporting is routinely sourced from official government agencies, public officials, court records, and firsthand documentation, with a commitment to transparency, attribution, corrections when warranted, and clearly distinguishing factual reporting from opinion.

Stilton's journalism follows established newsroom standards emphasizing accuracy, verification, fairness, and accountability. Every effort is made to verify information through official records and multiple reliable sources before publication. His reporting is intended to provide readers with timely, well-documented information that helps them understand the issues affecting their communities, while maintaining editorial independence from political parties, government agencies, advocacy organizations, and commercial interests.

Readers can submit story tips, corrections, public records, or media inquiries through the official Shore News Network website or its verified social media channels. Shore News Network welcomes corrections and updates when new information becomes available as part of its ongoing commitment to accurate and transparent journalism.