Federal judge keeps new jersey car dealership class action in federal court

Federal Judge Keeps New Jersey Car Dealership Class Action in Federal Court

Posted by
1 min read
April 19, 2026

NEWARK, N.J. — A federal judge denied a request to send a proposed class action lawsuit against two New Jersey car dealerships back to state court, allowing the case to proceed in federal court.

U.S. District Judge Stanley R. Chesler ruled against plaintiff Andrew Mallon’s motion to remand the case, which centers on alleged improper fees and registration delays tied to a used car purchase, according to a newly filed opinion.

Lawsuit targets dealership fees and registration delays

Mallon filed the lawsuit in January 2026 in Morris County Superior Court after purchasing a used vehicle in 2025 from Dalessio Auto Group, operating as Schumacher Chevrolet Buick of Boonton.

According to court filings, Mallon claims the dealership charged a $399 “documentary fee” without properly itemizing the services included, which he alleges violates New Jersey consumer protection laws.

He also alleges the dealership failed to provide timely vehicle registration and license plates for Michigan, where he resides, forcing him to obtain them independently at his own cost.

The lawsuit names three defendants: the Boonton dealership, a related dealership in Denville, and an individual identified as Judith Schumacher-Tilton.

Class action claims expand scope of case

The complaint includes four causes of action, with three brought as class claims alleging similar practices affected other customers.

Mallon argues both dealerships engaged in the same conduct regarding documentary fees, potentially impacting a broader group of buyers.

The fourth claim applies only to Mallon and focuses on the alleged failure to properly deliver registration and title documents.

Case moved to federal court under class action rules

Defendants removed the case to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), which allows certain large class action lawsuits to be heard at the federal level.

They argued the case meets federal jurisdiction thresholds, including involving more than 100 potential class members and exceeding $5 million in controversy.

Mallon sought to return the case to state court, but Judge Chesler rejected that request, keeping the case in federal jurisdiction.

Key Points
• Federal judge denied request to move dealership class action back to NJ state court
• Lawsuit alleges improper $399 fee and delayed vehicle registration
• Case remains in federal court under Class Action Fairness Act

Defense challenges claims against certain defendants

In addition to opposing the remand, some defendants have moved to dismiss claims against them.

They argue Mallon had no direct interaction with certain parties and dispute allegations that all dealerships used the same documentation practices.

One dealership submitted records showing it used a different form that itemized fees and included arbitration provisions, according to court filings.

What happens next

The case will now proceed in federal court, where motions to dismiss and other pretrial proceedings are expected to shape whether the claims move forward.

No ruling has yet been made on the merits of the allegations, and the claims remain unproven.

The lawsuit remains ongoing as both sides continue litigation in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.

Phil Stilton

Phil Stilton is the Editor and Publisher of Shore News Network, an independent digital newsroom providing original reporting on New Jersey, national news, government, public policy, public safety, courts, and community affairs.

As founder of the publication, Stilton leads editorial strategy, investigative reporting, and daily newsroom operations while overseeing coverage that reaches millions of readers annually.

With extensive experience covering municipal government, county government, state legislatures, elections, law enforcement, emergency management, and public records, Stilton specializes in translating complex government actions into clear, factual reporting. His work frequently relies on primary source documents, including court filings, legislation, public meeting records, election finance disclosures, government databases, police reports, and Freedom of Information and Open Public Records Act (OPRA) requests. He has reported extensively on local government accountability, taxpayer spending, campaign finance, public corruption investigations, infrastructure, public safety, and the policies affecting New Jersey residents.

Under Stilton's editorial leadership, Shore News Network has grown into one of New Jersey's largest independent digital news organizations, publishing thousands of original news articles each year while providing breaking news coverage, investigative reporting, and analysis across state and local government. The publication's reporting is routinely sourced from official government agencies, public officials, court records, and firsthand documentation, with a commitment to transparency, attribution, corrections when warranted, and clearly distinguishing factual reporting from opinion.

Stilton's journalism follows established newsroom standards emphasizing accuracy, verification, fairness, and accountability. Every effort is made to verify information through official records and multiple reliable sources before publication. His reporting is intended to provide readers with timely, well-documented information that helps them understand the issues affecting their communities, while maintaining editorial independence from political parties, government agencies, advocacy organizations, and commercial interests.

Readers can submit story tips, corrections, public records, or media inquiries through the official Shore News Network website or its verified social media channels. Shore News Network welcomes corrections and updates when new information becomes available as part of its ongoing commitment to accurate and transparent journalism.

Facebook

Don't Miss