Photo caption: gov. Mikie sherrill says there is no evidence a new jersey election was swayed by the state's noncitizen voter-registration failure as state officials continue reviewing affected records and federal officials press separate claims about the voter rolls. Photo by gov. Mikie sherrill's office / press photo
Gov. Mikie Sherrill says there is no evidence a New Jersey election was swayed by the state's noncitizen voter-registration failure as state officials continue reviewing affected records and federal officials press separate claims about the voter rolls. Photo by Gov. Mikie Sherrill's Office / Press Photo

Sherrill Says No Evidence NJ Elections Were Swayed After State Finds Hundreds of Noncitizens Voted

Gov. Mikie Sherrill is pushing back against President Donald Trump’s election claims even after New Jersey acknowledged a registration failure involving roughly 6,600 self-identified noncitizens, while DHS says as many as 35,152 additional registrations may warrant scrutiny.
Posted by
2 mins read
September 3, 2026
  • New Jersey initially disclosed that roughly 6,600 people who identified themselves as noncitizens were improperly registered through the Motor Vehicle Commission system between June 2023 and June 2024.
  • Sherrill initially said fewer than 400 people registered through the error voted; an August update put the number of newly registered voters who cast ballots at approximately 340, with hundreds of additional records requiring further review.
  • The Department of Homeland Security separately says as many as 35,152 noncitizens may be on New Jersey’s voter rolls, a figure the state has challenged and DHS has not publicly substantiated with individual records.

TRENTON, NJ — Gov. Mikie Sherrill says there is no evidence that New Jersey’s noncitizen voter-registration failure changed the outcome of an election, even as her administration continues reviewing thousands of registrations and the Trump administration presses a separate claim that more than 35,000 potential noncitizens may be on the state’s voter rolls.

The controversy began when Sherrill disclosed in July that a Motor Vehicle Commission system error had improperly registered roughly 6,600 people who identified themselves as non-U.S. citizens between June 2023 and June 2024. Those applicants had answered “no” when asked whether they were U.S. citizens, according to the governor, but were registered anyway. Sherrill initially said fewer than 400 subsequently cast ballots. The error occurred during former Gov. Phil Murphy’s administration.

The administration provided more detail Aug. 19, saying approximately 340 people newly registered because of the error had voted. Another roughly 220 people affected by the software problem also voted but had previous registrations or separate eligibility attestations that could indicate valid registrations, and their cases were referred for additional review. The state also placed about 1,450 registrations into rejected status pending county-level eligibility reviews. (

The state’s findings have fueled a broader confrontation with the Trump administration over noncitizen voting and New Jersey’s voter rolls. DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin has said federal data indicates there may be as many as 35,152 noncitizens registered in New Jersey and later suggested the number “may only be the beginning.” That federal figure remains disputed: DHS has not publicly released the underlying individual records or methodology necessary to establish that all 35,152 are currently noncitizens and improperly registered.

Sherrill has continued to reject Trump’s broader characterization of the problem. “I think what the people of New Jersey want to see is a transparent, accountable government so they understand what’s going on and how it’s going to be fixed and rectified,” Sherrill said in recent remarks. She accused Trump of “making spurious claims, presenting no evidence, constantly hiding the ball from people.”

The dispute is not over whether noncitizens were erroneously registered through the MVC system — New Jersey has acknowledged that failure and that some of those registrants voted. The unresolved questions concern the final number of ineligible voters who cast ballots, whether any did so knowingly, the accuracy of DHS’s much larger estimate and whether any race was affected. Sherrill has said the state has no evidence that an election outcome was swayed.

The controversy has also produced a political and legal fight over responsibility. Sherrill blamed a software failure and ordered an investigation, while IDEMIA, the technology vendor involved in the MVC system, disputed the suggestion that its software was responsible, saying voter eligibility ultimately had to be validated by the New Jersey Division of Elections. Republican lawmakers have meanwhile sought broader investigations into how the registrations were accepted and why the problem was not disclosed earlier.

Federal authorities have also pursued the issue separately. The Justice Department previously sought access to New Jersey’s statewide voter-registration database, but a federal judge dismissed that case after finding the government relied on a statute that did not authorize the records request at issue. Federal prosecutors have separately charged at least eight noncitizens with illegally voting in New Jersey elections between 2020 and 2024.

New Jersey’s investigation and county reviews remain ongoing as election officials work to determine which registrations must be removed and which involve people who can establish eligibility.

Phil Stilton

Phil Stilton is the Editor and Publisher of Shore News Network, an independent digital newsroom providing original reporting on New Jersey, national news, government, public policy, public safety, courts, and community affairs.

As founder of the publication, Stilton leads editorial strategy, investigative reporting, and daily newsroom operations while overseeing coverage that reaches millions of readers annually.

With extensive experience covering municipal government, county government, state legislatures, elections, law enforcement, emergency management, and public records, Stilton specializes in translating complex government actions into clear, factual reporting. His work frequently relies on primary source documents, including court filings, legislation, public meeting records, election finance disclosures, government databases, police reports, and Freedom of Information and Open Public Records Act (OPRA) requests. He has reported extensively on local government accountability, taxpayer spending, campaign finance, public corruption investigations, infrastructure, public safety, and the policies affecting New Jersey residents.

Under Stilton's editorial leadership, Shore News Network has grown into one of New Jersey's largest independent digital news organizations, publishing thousands of original news articles each year while providing breaking news coverage, investigative reporting, and analysis across state and local government. The publication's reporting is routinely sourced from official government agencies, public officials, court records, and firsthand documentation, with a commitment to transparency, attribution, corrections when warranted, and clearly distinguishing factual reporting from opinion.

Stilton's journalism follows established newsroom standards emphasizing accuracy, verification, fairness, and accountability. Every effort is made to verify information through official records and multiple reliable sources before publication. His reporting is intended to provide readers with timely, well-documented information that helps them understand the issues affecting their communities, while maintaining editorial independence from political parties, government agencies, advocacy organizations, and commercial interests.

Readers can submit story tips, corrections, public records, or media inquiries through the official Shore News Network website or its verified social media channels. Shore News Network welcomes corrections and updates when new information becomes available as part of its ongoing commitment to accurate and transparent journalism.