TRENTON, NJ – Assemblymen Greg McGuckin and Paul Kanitra are voicing strong opposition against Governor Phil Murphy’s intention to appoint what they describe as far-left activists to the New Jersey State Board of Education. The controversy centers on the nomination of Skillman resident Serena Rice, whom they argue holds extremist views that are inappropriate for influencing the state’s educational policies.
Rice’s nomination has sparked a grassroots movement among parents, leading to a successful campaign in March to delay a Senate vote on her appointment. However, McGuckin and Kanitra emphasize the need for continued vigilance to ensure Rice’s confirmation is excluded from the Senate’s agenda set for April 15. They plan to issue a formal letter to Senate President Nick Scutari requesting the nomination be postponed.
McGuckin criticized Rice for her stance on several issues, including her alleged disapproval of parents who object to their children being exposed to sexually explicit materials and drag queen shows. He argues that such perspectives do not align with the values of New Jersey families who prioritize realism and competitiveness in their children’s education.
The state Board of Education, a 13-member body responsible for shaping educational policies and advising the Department of Education, requires its members to be nominated by the governor and confirmed by the Senate. Members serve six-year terms, playing a crucial role in the administration of state education law.
Rice, who currently leads Abiding Peace Lutheran Church in Budd Lake and has a history of involvement with social justice and anti-poverty organizations, has been criticized by parents for her social media posts. These posts, which have since been removed from her public profile, include remarks attributing mass shootings to “white male patriarchy” and dismissing concerns over transgender athletes in women’s sports as trivial.
Kanitra expressed concern over Rice’s potential influence on educational content and her apparent disdain for parental rights, female athletes, and the innocence of childhood. He and McGuckin argue that such views should disqualify her from a position of authority within the state’s educational system.
