Virginia governor signs law that could effectively nullify the voters choice in future presidential elections

Virginia bill would tie state’s electoral votes to national result, overriding state outcome if different. Proposal would award electoral votes based on nationwide popular vote, not Virginia’s individual results

Richmond, VA — A Virginia proposal to join a national voting compact would mean the state’s electoral votes could go to a presidential candidate who did not win Virginia, if that candidate wins the popular vote nationwide.

The legislation, known as HB965, would align Virginia with the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, an agreement among participating states to award electoral votes to the candidate who receives the most votes across the entire country.

How the change would impact Virginia voters

Under the proposal, Virginians would still vote in presidential elections as they do now. But if the compact takes effect, the state’s electoral votes would no longer automatically go to the candidate who wins Virginia.

Instead, if a different candidate wins the national popular vote, Virginia would be required to award its electoral votes to that candidate—even if a majority of Virginia voters chose someone else.

That shift is the central point of debate.

Supporters vs. critics

Supporters argue the system ensures the presidency reflects the will of the most voters nationwide, rather than outcomes determined state-by-state.

Critics, however, say it effectively overrides the preferences of Virginia voters in cases where the state result differs from the national outcome.

They argue that under such a system, a voter in Virginia could cast a ballot for one candidate, see that candidate win the state, and still have Virginia’s electoral votes awarded to the opposing candidate based on results elsewhere.

Not immediate, but conditional

The compact would only take effect if enough states join to total 270 electoral votes—the number required to decide a presidential election.

Until that threshold is met, Virginia would continue awarding its electoral votes based on its own statewide results.

Broader implications

If enacted and activated, the change would represent a fundamental shift in how presidential elections function for participating states—moving away from a state-by-state system toward a national vote outcome.

Ongoing status

The proposal remains part of a broader national effort, with multiple states considering or already adopting similar measures, though it has not yet taken effect.

Phil Stilton Latest posts

Phil Stilton is the Editor and Publisher of Shore News Network, an independent digital newsroom providing original reporting on New Jersey, national news, government, public policy, public safety, courts, and community affairs.

As founder of the publication, Stilton leads editorial strategy, investigative reporting, and daily newsroom operations while overseeing coverage that reaches millions of readers annually.

With extensive experience covering municipal government, county government, state legislatures, elections, law enforcement, emergency management, and public records, Stilton specializes in translating complex government actions into clear, factual reporting. His work frequently relies on primary source documents, including court filings, legislation, public meeting records, election finance disclosures, government databases, police reports, and Freedom of Information and Open Public Records Act (OPRA) requests. He has reported extensively on local government accountability, taxpayer spending, campaign finance, public corruption investigations, infrastructure, public safety, and the policies affecting New Jersey residents.

Under Stilton's editorial leadership, Shore News Network has grown into one of New Jersey's largest independent digital news organizations, publishing thousands of original news articles each year while providing breaking news coverage, investigative reporting, and analysis across state and local government. The publication's reporting is routinely sourced from official government agencies, public officials, court records, and firsthand documentation, with a commitment to transparency, attribution, corrections when warranted, and clearly distinguishing factual reporting from opinion.

Stilton's journalism follows established newsroom standards emphasizing accuracy, verification, fairness, and accountability. Every effort is made to verify information through official records and multiple reliable sources before publication. His reporting is intended to provide readers with timely, well-documented information that helps them understand the issues affecting their communities, while maintaining editorial independence from political parties, government agencies, advocacy organizations, and commercial interests.

Readers can submit story tips, corrections, public records, or media inquiries through the official Shore News Network website or its verified social media channels. Shore News Network welcomes corrections and updates when new information becomes available as part of its ongoing commitment to accurate and transparent journalism.