White neoclassical building with tall columns, flagpoles, and blue sky; green lawn in foreground; tree branches frame the left side.

Judge halts Viriginia’s new Democrat favored redistricting referendum

Posted by
2 mins read
April 23, 2026

TAZEWELL COUNTY, Va. — Hold on there, Virginia Democrats, a Virginia judge has just overruled the party’s redistricting referendum that heavily favored the Democrat party.

A Virginia circuit court judge voided a voter-approved redistricting amendment Wednesday, ruling the measure unconstitutional and blocking its certification just one day after it narrowly passed statewide.

Judge Jack Hurley of the Tazewell County Circuit Court granted final judgment in favor of plaintiffs including the Republican National Committee, declaring the referendum legally invalid and halting its implementation, according to the court order.

Court says amendment process violated constitution

In his ruling, Hurley found that the resolution underpinning the ballot measure—House Joint Resolution 6007—was “void ab initio,” meaning it was invalid from the outset due to procedural and constitutional violations.

The order states the General Assembly failed to meet requirements under the Virginia Constitution, including the mandate that constitutional amendments be approved by two separately elected legislatures before going to voters.

Hurley also ruled that actions taken during the 2026 legislative session could not count as a valid second approval, citing the lack of a new House of Delegates election since the prior vote.

Additionally, the judge found that related legislation, House Bill 1384, violated constitutional standards governing how ballot questions are presented to voters.

Immediate impact on certified results

The decision effectively nullifies all votes cast in the referendum, which had passed by a narrow margin in Tuesday’s election.

The measure would have temporarily allowed the Democratic-controlled General Assembly to redraw congressional district maps, replacing the state’s bipartisan redistricting commission until after the 2030 census.

Supporters argued the change would streamline map-drawing and counter partisan advantages elsewhere, while opponents said it risked enabling gerrymandering.

Key Points
• Judge ruled Virginia redistricting amendment unconstitutional after voter approval
• Court found legislature failed required constitutional steps before referendum
• Decision blocks certification and voids all votes cast on the measure

Appeal expected from state officials

Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones criticized the ruling and confirmed the state will appeal, calling the decision the work of an “activist judge.”

The court order denied a request from state defendants to pause the ruling during an appeal, meaning the decision remains in effect for now.

Legal challenges to the referendum were already underway before the vote, reflecting the high political stakes tied to control of congressional district boundaries ahead of upcoming elections.

Broader political and legal stakes

Redistricting battles in Virginia have drawn national attention, with control over district maps influencing the balance of power in Congress.

Before the referendum, the state used a bipartisan commission to draw districts—a system set to resume after the 2030 census under the now-contested framework.

The ruling adds uncertainty to the state’s redistricting process and could trigger further court battles over how and when new maps can be drawn.

Current status of the case

The circuit court’s final judgment invalidates the amendment and blocks its certification, but the case is expected to move quickly to appellate courts as state officials challenge the decision.

Until a higher court intervenes, the referendum remains void and unenforceable under the current ruling.

Phil Stilton

Phil Stilton is the Editor and Publisher of Shore News Network, an independent digital newsroom providing original reporting on New Jersey, national news, government, public policy, public safety, courts, and community affairs.

As founder of the publication, Stilton leads editorial strategy, investigative reporting, and daily newsroom operations while overseeing coverage that reaches millions of readers annually.

With extensive experience covering municipal government, county government, state legislatures, elections, law enforcement, emergency management, and public records, Stilton specializes in translating complex government actions into clear, factual reporting. His work frequently relies on primary source documents, including court filings, legislation, public meeting records, election finance disclosures, government databases, police reports, and Freedom of Information and Open Public Records Act (OPRA) requests. He has reported extensively on local government accountability, taxpayer spending, campaign finance, public corruption investigations, infrastructure, public safety, and the policies affecting New Jersey residents.

Under Stilton's editorial leadership, Shore News Network has grown into one of New Jersey's largest independent digital news organizations, publishing thousands of original news articles each year while providing breaking news coverage, investigative reporting, and analysis across state and local government. The publication's reporting is routinely sourced from official government agencies, public officials, court records, and firsthand documentation, with a commitment to transparency, attribution, corrections when warranted, and clearly distinguishing factual reporting from opinion.

Stilton's journalism follows established newsroom standards emphasizing accuracy, verification, fairness, and accountability. Every effort is made to verify information through official records and multiple reliable sources before publication. His reporting is intended to provide readers with timely, well-documented information that helps them understand the issues affecting their communities, while maintaining editorial independence from political parties, government agencies, advocacy organizations, and commercial interests.

Readers can submit story tips, corrections, public records, or media inquiries through the official Shore News Network website or its verified social media channels. Shore News Network welcomes corrections and updates when new information becomes available as part of its ongoing commitment to accurate and transparent journalism.

Facebook

Breaking News

Don't Miss