Court rules you can’t sue over ‘take home’ COVID-19 Spread

by Jessica Woods
COVID-19 Pandemic Fraud

TRENTON, NJ – A California court decision could have an impact in the Garden State and the Empire State as thousand of people in New York and New Jersey got sick after their spouses were forced to go to work during the COVID-19 pandemic.

That ruling says you cannot sue an employer if you infected your family with COVID-19 contracted while on the job.

The California Supreme Court has ruled that employers cannot be held liable when workers contract COVID-19 on the job and spread it to their household members. The unanimous decision was in favor of business groups that expressed concerns about potential litigation overload.

Related News:  Bronx Man Chased Down and Stabbed by Robber Who Wanted His Backpack

The lawsuit was filed by Corby Kuciemba, who claimed she became seriously ill after her husband contracted COVID-19 at his job and transmitted it to her. However, the court stated that allowing “take-home COVID” claims could lead businesses to implement precautions that hinder public services or even shut down during pandemics.

The court highlighted that ruling in favor of Kuciemba would potentially make every employer in California a defendant, even if the company had taken reasonable measures to prevent the virus’s spread or if it is impossible to prove that employees contracted COVID-19 at work.

Justice Carol Corrigan, writing for the court, noted that even limiting the duty of care to employees’ household members would result in an enormous number of potential plaintiffs, possibly numbering in the millions.

Related News:  Newark Police Seek Public's Help to Identify Vandalism Suspect at Market Street Chipotle

William Bogdan, an attorney representing Victory Woodworks, the employer in this case, emphasized the significance of the ruling due to the two-year window for negligence lawsuits under California law.

The California Supreme Court took up the case after the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco sought clarification on whether California law recognizes negligence claims against employers when workers transmit COVID-19 to household members. The 9th Circuit is expected to uphold the decision to dismiss Kuciemba’s lawsuit following the recent ruling.

Business groups argued that allowing “take-home COVID” claims could open the door to lawsuits by the infected employee’s family and friends, as well as anyone infected by that network, leading to an endless chain of liability.

Related News:  Illegal Migrants Attempt To Hijack School Buses Full of Children in California
author avatar
Jessica Woods
Jessica, a life-long Jersey girl who has left the state is SNN's lifestyle, food and social coordinator. She is a PN that enjoys blogging and writing about her home state and surrounding area.

You may also like

You can't access this website

Shore News Network provides free news to users. No paywalls. No subscriptions. Please support us by disabling ad blocker or using a different browser and trying again.