Supreme Court Rejects Challenges To Law That Gives American Indians Priority In Adopting Indian Kids

Supreme Court Rejects Challenges To Law That Gives American Indians Priority In Adopting Indian Kids

Katelynn Richardson on June 15, 2023

The Supreme Court rejected challenges to the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA), which requires preference be given to Indian families when making adoption placements for Indian children, in a 7-2 ruling Thursday.

While intended to keep Indian families together after years of government policies that separated them, plaintiffs in Haaland v. Brackeen argued that the ICWA violates the Tenth Amendment’s anticommandeering principles by forcing states to implement a federal statute, exceeds Congress’ authority and illegally discriminates based on race — putting Indian children at a disadvantage for finding a home and even keeping them in abusive situations, according to court documents.

“[T]he bottom line is that we reject all of petitioners’ challenges to the statute, some on the merits and others for lack of standing,” Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote in the majority opinion, which was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The Supreme Court heard Haaland v. Brackeen, which consolidated multiple cases challenging the law brought by Texas and seven individuals, in November. The lead plaintiffs, Chad and Jennifer Brackeen, faced roadblocks when they tried in 2017 to adopt a Native American child they’d fostered for 16 months and again when they later tried to adopt his half-sister, court documents show.

Unless “good cause” can be demonstrated, courts must follow ICWA’s placement preferences for Indian children: first a member of the child’s extended family, then a member of the child’s tribe and then any other Indian family, according to the statute.

Under ICWA, the alternate placement found by the Navajo Nation—an unrelated tribal member in another state—had priority over the Brackeens. Only when this potential placement family withdrew was the couple able to adopt, according to court documents.

The district court initially determined sections of ICWA were unconstitutional and found regulating the adoption of Indian children to be beyond Congress’ authority. A full 5th Circuit later affirmed in part and reversed in part the lower court ruling.

The Supreme Court has heard cases dealing with ICWA twice before: in 1989 with Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield and 2013 with Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl. In Baby Girl, the Court held 5-4 that ICWA did not allow a Cherokee father who never had custody of the child to object to a planned adoption.