Enough is Enough! Congressman Says Murphy, Dems Ignoring Offshore Wind Risks

POINT PLEASANT BEACH, NJ – Rep. Chris Smith (R-Manchester) voiced his concerns about the offshore wind industrialization initiatives by President Biden and Governor Murphy during a rally at Point Pleasant Beach. Smith has been actively questioning the initiatives and is the author of two House measures demanding deeper investigations into the impact of offshore wind projects.

Rep. Smith expressed his dismay that approximately 3,400 ocean wind turbines could be installed without community consultation. “We say no—enough is enough,” he emphasized. He expressed serious reservations about the lack of transparency and answers to pressing environmental and security questions.

To address these concerns, Smith has successfully pushed for two amendments. The first tasks the Government Accountability Office (GAO) with investigating the environmental review processes of various federal agencies concerning offshore wind projects. The GAO’s report will assess the potential impacts on marine life, fishing, tourism, and radar interference, among others.

The second amendment requires a certification ensuring offshore wind turbines don’t interfere with radars critical to the Federal Aviation Administration or the Armed Forces. This comes after various global reports highlighting potential risks to radar systems from offshore wind turbines, including concerns raised by Taiwan, Finland, and Japan’s military.

Smith also cited financial concerns, referencing a comment by Brian Lipman, Director of New Jersey’s Division of Rate Counsel, which suggested that a Murphy-backed law could increase electricity rates for consumers.

He concluded by emphasizing the importance of protecting the pristine New Jersey coastline, stating, “For all of these reasons and more, ocean wind development off our absolutely amazing and beautiful coast must be stopped. Enough is enough.”

Shore News Network Staff Report

Shore News Network Staff Report is the official newsroom byline used by Shore News Network when a story is produced through the collaborative work of multiple members of the editorial team rather than a single reporter.

This newsroom account is reserved for articles that involve contributions from multiple journalists, editors, photographers, researchers, or news desk staff. It is also used for developing stories that are updated as new verified information becomes available, as well as for community announcements, weather coverage, public safety alerts, election results, and other newsroom-produced content.

Every article published under the Shore News Network Staff Report byline is reviewed and edited in accordance with the organization's editorial standards for accuracy, fairness, attribution, and transparency. Information is verified through official government agencies, court records, law enforcement, public documents, direct reporting, interviews, and other reliable primary and secondary sources before publication whenever possible.

The Staff Report account does not use artificial intelligence to independently generate news or publish unverified information. AI-assisted tools may occasionally be used for editorial support tasks such as transcription, formatting, grammar review, or workflow efficiency, but all published content is subject to human editorial oversight and approval by Shore News Network's newsroom staff.

As an independently owned digital news organization, Shore News Network is committed to original reporting, public safety journalism, government accountability, local community coverage, and breaking news throughout New Jersey and surrounding regions. Stories published under the Staff Report byline reflect the collective experience and editorial judgment of the Shore News Network newsroom.

Readers who have corrections, additional information, or news tips related to a Staff Report article are encouraged to contact the newsroom at news@shorenewsnetwork.com. Shore News Network welcomes factual corrections and updates as part of its commitment to accurate, transparent journalism.